Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Reconnaissance after the Canberra

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Reconnaissance after the Canberra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Apr 2002, 22:43
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's what I was suggesting . But then again, I know £*** all about naval aircrewmen .
TimC is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2002, 23:22
  #42 (permalink)  
bad livin'
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There have been and are RN people on exchange to the RAF and doubtless Army too. I met a bag obs at Wadddington workin on the E3, and I have a friend who is a Flt Ops officer in the air force currently working at sea on a CVS. Answer your question? Also met a Warfare Branch FCer at Coltishall last year working on exchange.

Rgds TimC and hope you enjoyed ISK!

BL
 
Old 16th Apr 2002, 10:01
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
biggles819 - You don't think a "17 year old school leaver" could have more knowledge of battlefield equipment than an officer? Have you heard of training and experience? Do you know what you are talking about?

If it came down to a "school leaver" enlisted intelligence person or a logistics officer trying to discern what military equipment and phase of operations is happening on the ground I know which one I'd rather have! Hint - It's not the logistics officer.

Another point since I'm here. If you are going to have a go at "17 year old school leavers" you should maybe have stayed at school longer given this spelling effort.

Quote "I really dont think that a 17 year old school leaver has more knowledge on battlefield equiptment than an officer. comon speak sense" End Quote

Military Aircrew have to be able to spell better than that. Looks like you have some work to do if you want to become one.
eye_spy is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2002, 10:16
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slightly off the point, something I forgot to add in my last post.

/rant on

biggles819 - If you are under the impression that there is a massive gap in the education level of officers and enlisted personnel nowadays I think in all but the extreme cases you may be flogging a dead horse. It was true 100 years ago, not so now.

For example I am an NCO in the RAAF. My initial education requirements for entry into my trade at the enlisted level were higher than all but Pilot, Navigator and Engineer (who as it happens are commissioned officers). So why am I not commissioned? I can't do this job as an officer...and apart from aircrew this is the only job I'd want to do in the military.


/rant off

That feels better!
eye_spy is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2002, 22:36
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: U.K.
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WEBF,
for info, at Kinloss there are 2 RN Observer exchanges and 1 PO Aircrewman exchange. They are fully integrated into Nimrod crews as navigators or sonics operator.
Imhotep is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.