F/A-18 with JATO/RATO
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F/A-18 with JATO/RATO
Does any military pilot have experience of both (a) flying with JATO/RATO and (b) flying with catapult launch from a carrier? Is the thrust comparable? And are the piloting skills similar?
Would it be possible to use JATO/RATO on an F/A-18 to provide a cost-effective way of simulating catapult launches from a land base?
And could JATO/RATO be used to fly F/A-18 from a carrier without use of catapult (using a passive steering guide shoe if necessary)?
Note: JATO/RATO refers to rocket-assisted take-off. The letter J was used prior to subsequent development of jet engines.
Would it be possible to use JATO/RATO on an F/A-18 to provide a cost-effective way of simulating catapult launches from a land base?
And could JATO/RATO be used to fly F/A-18 from a carrier without use of catapult (using a passive steering guide shoe if necessary)?
Note: JATO/RATO refers to rocket-assisted take-off. The letter J was used prior to subsequent development of jet engines.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes
on
46 Posts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
skyhawk chu lai - Google Search
Thanks, Sinbad, followed through to Chu Lai Airbase, arrestor wires and A-4 with RATO, also found use of RATO on Buccaneer for hot-and-high in South Africa and some Mirage III tests.
RATO thrust seems rather limited, for example 8000lbf from two Bristol Siddeley rockets on the Buccaneer, enough to assist but not really sufficient for carrier launch. Hurrricanes ramp-launched from merchant ships during WWII used very large rockets.
Rockets are usually dropped after launch. Difficult to recover at sea, especially in an active warzone. The SA Buccaneer rockets folded in for stowage but took up fuselage space and their weight was a penalty.
Structural strengthening is necessary to carry the rocket thrust into the airframe.
I guess the answer to my question is that JATO/RATO does not provide sufficient assistance for carrier launch, and development of a practical system would cost many thousands of dollars and take a couple of years to develop (uk equivalents: many billions of pounds and a couple of decades).
Many thanks to all who have viewed and contributed.
Thanks, Sinbad, followed through to Chu Lai Airbase, arrestor wires and A-4 with RATO, also found use of RATO on Buccaneer for hot-and-high in South Africa and some Mirage III tests.
RATO thrust seems rather limited, for example 8000lbf from two Bristol Siddeley rockets on the Buccaneer, enough to assist but not really sufficient for carrier launch. Hurrricanes ramp-launched from merchant ships during WWII used very large rockets.
Rockets are usually dropped after launch. Difficult to recover at sea, especially in an active warzone. The SA Buccaneer rockets folded in for stowage but took up fuselage space and their weight was a penalty.
Structural strengthening is necessary to carry the rocket thrust into the airframe.
I guess the answer to my question is that JATO/RATO does not provide sufficient assistance for carrier launch, and development of a practical system would cost many thousands of dollars and take a couple of years to develop (uk equivalents: many billions of pounds and a couple of decades).
Many thanks to all who have viewed and contributed.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes
on
46 Posts
A4G pilots experienced at first a 100 foot catapult stroke at approx. 6Gs, then later HMAS Melbourne catapult lengthened to approx. 110 feet via bits from BONAVENTURE (when scrapped). It was quite a shock for a first timer. Literally took your breath away from a solid punch to the chest.
Usually RAN fixed wing pilots were trained beginner/advanced with the RAAF system so there was no opportunity in the Skyhawk era to experience a catapult before the first A4G arrest and cat. However in the mid-60s some new RAN FAA pilots were trained in the USN in the USofA so they got to do arrests and free deck takeoffs in Trojans aboard USS Lexington.
Early Fireflies and Sea Fury used RATOG from HMAS Sydney but it was fraught with problems, particularly if only one rocket of the two fired. One pilot and aircraft were lost due this asymmetric problem.
Usually RAN fixed wing pilots were trained beginner/advanced with the RAAF system so there was no opportunity in the Skyhawk era to experience a catapult before the first A4G arrest and cat. However in the mid-60s some new RAN FAA pilots were trained in the USN in the USofA so they got to do arrests and free deck takeoffs in Trojans aboard USS Lexington.
Early Fireflies and Sea Fury used RATOG from HMAS Sydney but it was fraught with problems, particularly if only one rocket of the two fired. One pilot and aircraft were lost due this asymmetric problem.
Last edited by SpazSinbad; 29th Sep 2012 at 10:57.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 28°52'02"N
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But could you restrain a rocket pack to a rail on the deck so it accelerated the aircraft whilst itself remained attached to the ship? I accept the many problems with impressive flames setting fire to matelots etc (although reheat doesn't seem to be a problem), but you could pack a huge amount of energy into a system that was added to an existing deck, without the supporting generating kit for electro magnetic or steam launch, just a magazine full of cartridges. Since there would not be huge forces to react, the ship shouldn't need fundamental strengthening.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sinbad - Thanks for the information about A-4, especially the 6g, for F/A-18 this gives:
Max t/o weight: 60,000lb
Thrust for 6g: 360,000lbf
Engine thrust: 70,000lbf with burners
Required rocket thrust: 290,000lbf
Rather a lot of rocket!
Waddo - Yes, rocket trolley launch is an option, for example Barnes Wallis used rocket trolley launch for his Wild Goose programme:
Sir Barnes Wallis - Supersonics
Rocket thrust requirement is again a bit of a problem.
Sam - Wow, I've been called a troll many times, especially on a nearby thread. I am greatly honoured by your suggestion that I might be a Super-Troll with Whitehall connections. Alas no, just a dumb old engineer, retired from active involvement. Thanks!
Max t/o weight: 60,000lb
Thrust for 6g: 360,000lbf
Engine thrust: 70,000lbf with burners
Required rocket thrust: 290,000lbf
Rather a lot of rocket!
Waddo - Yes, rocket trolley launch is an option, for example Barnes Wallis used rocket trolley launch for his Wild Goose programme:
Sir Barnes Wallis - Supersonics
Rocket thrust requirement is again a bit of a problem.
Sam - Wow, I've been called a troll many times, especially on a nearby thread. I am greatly honoured by your suggestion that I might be a Super-Troll with Whitehall connections. Alas no, just a dumb old engineer, retired from active involvement. Thanks!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Waddo - Interesting question, difficult to answer. I wonder whether Farnborough still have their ski-jump available for trials. Not sure what happens to the rocket-powered trolley....
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 28°52'02"N
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It shouldn't be too difficult to deflect the efflux upwards at about 30 ° from the sled avoiding singed bell bottoms, whilst only putting about 120K pounds vertical into the deck.