Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

A330 AAR Boom Goes AWOL

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

A330 AAR Boom Goes AWOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jun 2013, 16:27
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: liverpool uk
Age: 67
Posts: 1,339
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
The UAE one in Almeira had its boom firmly attached when I saw it last week, but it was on the ground.
air pig is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2013, 22:54
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: nr Ely, Cambs
Age: 61
Posts: 380
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
YG - 27000 pies?, wonder the thing got airborne in the first place!
brokenlink is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2013, 05:19
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,873
Received 342 Likes on 119 Posts
The UAE one in Almeira had its boom firmly attached when I saw it last week, but it was on the ground.
Rumour has it that, although it moved rapidly and uncontrollably to both lateral limits, it did actually remain attached this time.....
BEagle is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2013, 09:51
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
the system fell away at the point where it links to the fuselage..........
Nutloose!

Where were you on or about the 10th September? and it had better be good...
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2013, 21:43
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 71
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As an aside, we in the hamlet of Pig on't Hill, were treated to Her Majesties Voyager accompanied by 3 Tornado's, making lots of noise at about 4000 ft yesterday (26 June). Nice to see, and I took it that they had been off refuelling somewhere ?

Smudge
smujsmith is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2013, 09:19
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Coleby Grange
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smuj,

What you saw was probably the Italian 767 which had spent the night at Brize.

Hope it made you feel proud anyhow.

IF
Indicating Full is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2013, 13:36
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Global Vagabond
Posts: 637
Received 30 Likes on 2 Posts
What scenario makes it necessary for the UAE to need three tankers for anyway?
mini is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2013, 14:18
  #48 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WW3 perhaps?
BOAC is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2013, 19:26
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 54
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point mini. They probably need 7.

D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2013, 19:27
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 71
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Indicating Full,

Thanks for that mate, it had the usual howl of the Voyager descending towards Brize, quickly drowned out by the "rage" of the three Tonkas. At my age knowing one "airliner" from another is getting to be hard work

Certainly, anything with a Royal Air Force roundel on it, gets a full beam of pride from me (no, facetious nous intended). Thanks again for that info.

Smudge

Last edited by smujsmith; 28th Jun 2013 at 19:30.
smujsmith is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2013, 12:56
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smudge,

See following for images of the Italian KC-767 and Italian Tornados landing at Brize.

Flickr: Dan Partlett's Photostream
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2013, 22:16
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: .
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard this plane was/is doing regular runs to the west coast USA from UAE-UK Do they do training out there?

Last edited by falcon10; 7th Aug 2013 at 00:36.
falcon10 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2013, 00:22
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The four RAAF KC-30s in service at AMB are not using the boom and probably wont until next year. If one were to have come close to separating, it may have been on 001 which remains in Spain with Airbus...
FoxtrotAlpha18 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2013, 04:47
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,873
Received 342 Likes on 119 Posts
The four RAAF KC-30s in service at AMB are not using the boom and probably wont until next year.
And how are they getting on with the Mission Planning System now? Working fine, is it?
BEagle is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2013, 07:13
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can neither confirm nor deny that, but I especially can't confirm it!
FoxtrotAlpha18 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2013, 07:38
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A question. From the figures I can find, standard empty weight plus max fuel takes the MRTT up to max Take Off Weight.
Is that correct?
John
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2013, 09:00
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,873
Received 342 Likes on 119 Posts
AiM used to quote a typical AAR OEW for the A330MRTT (including 6 crew, pods, boom and mil. avionics) of 124849 kg. Given an MTOW of 233000 kg, that means a maximum of 108151 kg of fuel at take-off.

However, the Voyager doesn't have the heavy boom, so it's probably just possible to carry 111 tonnes of fuel given the typical OEW.....
BEagle is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2013, 10:21
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the Voyager doesn't have the heavy boom
Nor does the A330MRTT
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2013, 10:47
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Next question
According to Wiki
A330-200 - MTOW is 240,000kg
A330 MRTT - MTOW is 233,000kg.
Why the difference?
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2013, 23:49
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: On the Bay, Vic, Oz
Age: 80
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably the row of canons down each side

alisoncc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.