Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Bringing back the Avro (Canada) Arrow

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Bringing back the Avro (Canada) Arrow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2012, 12:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wessex
Posts: 485
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aready been done;

Canadian Air & Space Museum | Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

Ok so its a static replica but having seen her a few years ago a pretty darn good one!

Out of interest I was once told that the navigator on the Arrow test programme was the same guy that flew in the back of TSR 2 - probably an urban myth so please don't flame me
Rocket2 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 12:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: moraira,spain-Norfolk, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nimrod + computer

As someone who knew a little about these things at the time,
the GEC4080 computer which was used for company reasons
had by no means sufficient power. Other computers were available which would have been OK, but 'not invented here'
esa-aardvark is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 18:26
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London UK
Posts: 531
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Isn't this essentially what the USAF were trying to do when they trialled the Texan II and super Tucano? Kind of makes my point.
I always thought Supermarine missed a trick by not putting a Rolls Royce Dart on the Spiteful.
Dr Jekyll is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 18:51
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Somewhere on a dodgy name badge
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a cunning plan, My Lord.

Why don't we buy really, really expensive stealth jets.

Then put them on an aircraft carrier with the radar cross section of Yorkshire.
Justin Cyder-Belvoir is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 19:06
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or why not get a short range version that has to based so close to the enemy they won't need a radar to find them, just a pair of glasses and an ear trumpet (assuming they're either blind or deaf).

Last edited by Willard Whyte; 12th Sep 2012 at 19:07.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2012, 21:10
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Somewhere flat
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BGG. Something like this?

goofer3 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2012, 01:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CYYC
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok so its a static replica but having seen her a few years ago a pretty darn good one!
Maybe we should just get these guys to add a couple of guns.

Arrow II Replica

Fuselage Assembly
goates is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2012, 05:54
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr Jekyll
I always thought Supermarine missed a trick by not putting a Rolls Royce Dart on the Spiteful.
The Piper PA-48 Enforcer was a turboprop powered light close air support/ground-attack aircraft built by Piper Aircraft Corp., Lakeland, Florida. It was the ultimate development of the original World War II North American P-51 Mustang.
The original prototype (conversion of a WW2-built P-51 by the Cavalier Aircraft Co.) used a Rolls-Royce Dart 510.
The 4 PA-48 prototypes built (2 converted from P-51s in 1971 & 2 more new-built* in 1984) used a Lycoming T-55L-9.


* less than 10% of the airframe was common with the P-51.

Cavalier Turbo Mustang III - converted P-51 N6167U Rolls-Royce Dart 510



Piper PA-48 - converted P-51 N201PE (Lycoming T-55L-9)


Last edited by GreenKnight121; 13th Sep 2012 at 06:05.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2012, 06:56
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London UK
Posts: 531
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
As I recall the turbo Mustang came close to catching on, which is why I think an equivalent 20 years earlier might have been a success.
Dr Jekyll is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2012, 14:36
  #30 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,574
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
By coincidence I was walking around and under the TSR-2 prototype only yesterday and thinking...."What the hell were they thinking of, cancelling this fine, amazing beast of an aeroplane?"

The airframe still looks modern to me. All they have to do is put some modern, relatively miniaturised avionics and a pair of decent engines in there and Bob's yer uncle....
ShyTorque is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.