RAF Kinloss mountain rescue team 'to relocate'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 59°09N 002°38W (IATA: SOY, ICAO: EGER)
Age: 80
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF Kinloss mountain rescue team 'to relocate'
BBC reporting that Kinloss MRT relocates to Lossiemouth on 26 July
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Carnoustie
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not a surprise
BBC got it wrong again saying that the Sea Kings were based at Kinloss too. No mention of the ARCC.
It's a pity for the MRT guys as they had a relatively new purpose built facility just beside the MRA4 simulator building.
It's a pity for the MRT guys as they had a relatively new purpose built facility just beside the MRA4 simulator building.
Last edited by exblanketstacker; 8th Jul 2012 at 19:17.
And what about ....
...the very expensive building and training facility that was built for them? Will that be replicated at Lossie? Surely they're no going to go back to some old buildings that nobody else wants? After all they spent some people's lifetimes in those old green sheds left over from WW2.
Best of luck in the future guys.
The Ancient Mariner
Best of luck in the future guys.
The Ancient Mariner
Last edited by Rossian; 8th Jul 2012 at 19:27. Reason: Buggah!! Beaten to it.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NE Jockland
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rossian
Surely they're no going to go back to some old buildings that nobody else wants?
Walrus...
...is there an empty mess at Lossie?? Will it have a suitable abseiling wall?
I suppose it's a variation of the old theme of "Resurface the runway" "Close the airfield."
Was the special building at KSS a PFI contruct? Seemed suitably shoddy in that the roof blew off with a stiffish wind (as did the OPs block roof).
The Ancient Mariner
I suppose it's a variation of the old theme of "Resurface the runway" "Close the airfield."
Was the special building at KSS a PFI contruct? Seemed suitably shoddy in that the roof blew off with a stiffish wind (as did the OPs block roof).
The Ancient Mariner
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: in the bath
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why move them?
Wouldn't it make more sense to transfer the group to the army and leave then where they are? They could become a specialist mountain warfare / survival school for the special forces
Wouldn't it make more sense to transfer the group to the army and leave then where they are? They could become a specialist mountain warfare / survival school for the special forces
Just another erk
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 77
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Randy thats done already, different terrain, different conditions, keep mountain rescue in the RAF, re-location, not good, but they will adapt, mountain rescue was started for downed aircrew, and that should be done by the RAF.
From Wickipedia : mountain rescue teams were first organised during World War II to rescue aircrew from the large number of aircraft crashes then occurring on high ground.
ex valley MR
From Wickipedia : mountain rescue teams were first organised during World War II to rescue aircrew from the large number of aircraft crashes then occurring on high ground.
ex valley MR
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: in the bath
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"the large number of aircraft crashes then occurring on high ground"
But that doesn't really apply now does it?
And if they ever had to go to war and try to retrieve downed aircrew, then in two years there won't be any helicopters available to lift them anyway.
Better the task be folded into another group where the skills are likely to be used / saved. As it stands, with the number of civilian volunteer MRT teams, its a candidate for the budgetary chop
But that doesn't really apply now does it?
And if they ever had to go to war and try to retrieve downed aircrew, then in two years there won't be any helicopters available to lift them anyway.
Better the task be folded into another group where the skills are likely to be used / saved. As it stands, with the number of civilian volunteer MRT teams, its a candidate for the budgetary chop
Just another erk
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 77
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The skills are different from mountain warfare and special forces, since when do they carry a stretcher up a mountain and then bring a casuallty down to a waiting ambulance, or in a number of cases a body, its is a different case, we carried no weapons, just back packs with the kit we needed, as for helecopters, yes they are useful if they can get in, often the conditions (then 1969 in my case) the weather prohibited the use of choppers, and it takes more than 2 men to bring a stretcher down. Also would the special forces or mountain warfare spend a lot of time practicing falling leader, ect.
Last edited by ArthurR; 10th Jul 2012 at 21:41.
...the very expensive building and training facility that was built for them?
In turn SARTU were forced to move into the old SECO huts that were the old unit 'previously known as STCAAME' (as no one could remember what its new name was).
But at least this allowed the MRT to park all their vehicles in the car park next to the beach - average life about 2 years before the salt and sand laden winds write them off.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Age: 54
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having done an MR course with some members of the RAF MRT I can do nothing but praise them. There is a lot of commitment and sacrifice to the role which for some (many?) is in addition to their normal duty billet.
I can see how the bean counters in binning MoD derived SAR might also seek to look at the MRT; however they do also have a function regarding the security of the site of the crash site - which might not be best filled with some of thev(excellent IMO) volunteer civilian MRTs or even the Duty Officer and whoever they can rustle up.
Still, if they opened up a trade akin to the USAF PJs this might be the best of all roles for both CSAR and MAC P.
I can see how the bean counters in binning MoD derived SAR might also seek to look at the MRT; however they do also have a function regarding the security of the site of the crash site - which might not be best filled with some of thev(excellent IMO) volunteer civilian MRTs or even the Duty Officer and whoever they can rustle up.
Still, if they opened up a trade akin to the USAF PJs this might be the best of all roles for both CSAR and MAC P.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NE Jockland
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bless you mate, here have a tissue.
Yup, the SNECs mess, it's 3 storys tall.
(Soon to be a heap of rubble tho.)
Originally Posted by Rossian
...is there an empty mess at Lossie?? Will it have a suitable abseiling wall?
(Soon to be a heap of rubble tho.)
Last edited by Walrus75; 9th Jul 2012 at 19:44.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shackman,
Your post # 13 could give the impression that the MRSHQ and Valley MRT were delighted to move from the former STCAAME/AGWOEU site into the SARTU complex; in reality, nothing could be further from the truth.
The STCAAME/AGWOEU site was converted (at considerable expense) in late 2004 to suit the needs of the MRS (including undercover vehicle parking). Whilst not perfect it was more than adequate. Subsequently, higher authority (including some in SARFHQ) decided in 2008 (against the wishes of the MRS and I suspect many of the SARTU staff) to enforce the swap over of the 2 facilities.
Your post # 13 could give the impression that the MRSHQ and Valley MRT were delighted to move from the former STCAAME/AGWOEU site into the SARTU complex; in reality, nothing could be further from the truth.
The STCAAME/AGWOEU site was converted (at considerable expense) in late 2004 to suit the needs of the MRS (including undercover vehicle parking). Whilst not perfect it was more than adequate. Subsequently, higher authority (including some in SARFHQ) decided in 2008 (against the wishes of the MRS and I suspect many of the SARTU staff) to enforce the swap over of the 2 facilities.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shackman,
Fully concur with that. SARTU and the MRSHQ/Valley MRT were pawns in someone else's game! I suspect that Kinloss MRT will end up taking a backward step wrt infrastructure when they move east, whilst the Army will inherit a luxury 'post room' with attached 'stable block' at Kinloss. It's a great shame.
Regards
OW
Fully concur with that. SARTU and the MRSHQ/Valley MRT were pawns in someone else's game! I suspect that Kinloss MRT will end up taking a backward step wrt infrastructure when they move east, whilst the Army will inherit a luxury 'post room' with attached 'stable block' at Kinloss. It's a great shame.
Regards
OW
And if they ever had to go to war and try to retrieve downed aircrew, then in two years [sic] there won't be any helicopters available to lift them anyway.