Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

PFI Hospitals going bust, what are the implications for the future of MoD & AirTanker

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

PFI Hospitals going bust, what are the implications for the future of MoD & AirTanker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jun 2012, 20:53
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AirTanker bashing seems to be reaching new levels here. I'm surprised that this summer's crap weather has not been pinned on ATrS yet.
mr snow is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2012, 21:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh come on Mr. Snow,

All the operators want is an Airtanker that is capable of successfully passing fuel to its receiver. It's not much to ask is it?
lj101 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2012, 07:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Or even carry the odd item of SLF.

Last edited by Wander00; 30th Jun 2012 at 11:08.
Wander00 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2012, 09:45
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be fair, they are doing AT.

Nairobi run this weekend.....
lj101 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2012, 10:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the edge
Posts: 237
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm in general agreement with Mr Snow on this one.

The aircraft has had snags with its AAR equipment. The same fault would have manifested itself even if the RAF owned the aircraft. If anything, the financial imperative to get the capability up and running for contractural reasons may well mean a faster rectification than if the problem was being worked by ...... BAe or another contractor who is paid by the hour regardless of sucess as would otherwise be the case.
The aircraft is carrying passengers on live tasking, crews are qualified on type and more aircraft are on the way. This is what, 4 years after signing the contract?
Yes, as with anything where payments are spread rather than made upfront, the overall cost will be way more than if the MOD had the means to purchase than aircraft outright. But do you really think that the RAF could have got it up and running any quicker? I reckon they'd still be working out what colour to paint the hangar or working out how to put all 3 FMS heads under the exclusive control of a navigator.

I will of course stand by to be amazed by shining examples of MOD aircraft procurement and introduction to service.

Standing by.

Arty
Arty Fufkin is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2012, 19:16
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,203
Received 117 Likes on 53 Posts
So it is carrying troops into theatre....

Oh wait....
downsizer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.