Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAAF Mirage 3 losses

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAAF Mirage 3 losses

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Apr 2012, 05:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
RAAF Mirage 3 losses

Was up at Fightertown with Little Tartare looking at the jets the other day.
What struck me about the Mirage 3 (beautiful looking jet) was what appeared to be the large number of fatal crashes when introduced into RAAF service.
Almost one a year, in some cases two a year.
Have searched the interweb as to why - but not much luck yet.
I wondered if there were any common factors?
Certainly the cockpit feels very cramped - slightly more so than other fast-jet ones I've been in... I'd hate to have to eject from that.
Can any ex-Mirage pilots shed any light?
tartare is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2012, 09:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is some information here :-

ADF Serials - RAAF A3 GAF Mirage III

John
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 16:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BOQ
Age: 79
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That is fascinating reading.

Had a USAF friend who did an exchange tour in RAAF Mirage III's. Said it was the best duty he ever had.
OK465 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 11:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
almost every 50's & 60's fast jet had what would now be considered unacceptable loss rates

In 1965-73 the US lost to ACCIDENTS only in S E Asia

F-4 Phantom 62 aircraft
F-105 63
F-100 45

Thread Military Aircraft Accident Statistics [Archive] - PPRuNe Forums has some horror stories about the Harrier

1975-93 the USAF had 204 F-16A "Class A" Accidents

Quote:- Formation position, phase of flight and primary cause of the mishap indicate that maneuvering, cruise and low-level phases account for the majority of the mishaps (71%),

air-to-air engagements associated with a higher proportion of pilot error (71%) than was air-to-ground (49%).

Engine failure was the number one cause of mishaps (35%),

collision with the ground the next most frequent (24%).

Pilot error was determined as causative in 55% of all the mishaps.

Pilot error was often associated with other non-pilot related causes. Channelized attention, loss of situational awareness, and spatial disorientation accounted for approximately 30% of the total pilot error causes found. Pilot demographics, flight hour/sortie profiles, and aircrew injuries are also listed.

Fatalities occurred in 27% of the mishaps, with 97% of those involving pilot errors.
------------------------------------
The Indian AF is currently writing off a plane a month


according to Wikipedia :-

F-104 Starfighter Some operators lost a large proportion of their aircraft through accidents, although the accident rate varied widely depending on the user and operating conditions; the Luftwaffe lost about 30% of aircraft in accidents over its operating career, and Canada lost over 50% of its F-104s.

The Spanish Air Force, however, lost none.

The Class A mishap rate (write off) of the F-104 in USAF service was 26.7 accidents per 100,000 flight hours as of June 1977,(30.63 through the end of 2007]), the highest accident rate of any USAF Century Series fighter. By comparison, the rate of the Convair F-102 Delta Dagger was 14.2/100,000 (13.69 through 2007), and the mishap rate for the North American F-100 Super Sabre was 16.25 accidents per 100,000 flight hours.
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 16:25
  #5 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK465 - that wouldn't be WZ would it by any chance?
My father did an exchange to W'Town back in the 70s as a Medical Officer. I remember him bring involved in a couple Mirage III crash investigations.....
StopStart is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 16:49
  #6 (permalink)  
Drain Bamaged
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 56
Posts: 536
Received 35 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
the Luftwaffe lost about 30% of aircraft in accidents over its operating career, and Canada lost over 50% of its F-104s.
Something need to be put back into its contest here.
The Canadians CF-104 had the highest flying time, close to 6000hrs per airframe versus something like 2000 for the Lufwaffe.



Anyway, back to the Mirage III.
ehwatezedoing is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 17:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BOQ
Age: 79
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
StopStart:

Yes that would be WZ.

Semi-famous picture of him & his WSO standing by the tail (what was left of it) of his F-4E.

I took him on his T-37 student cross country way back when and flew against him a few times in a couple of the aircraft Heathrow Harry mentions, when WZ was flying Reserve F-16's.

RAAF fighter exchange was one of the all-time good deals. Enjoyed hearing about his exploits in the Mirage...and on the ground.
OK465 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 18:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Aussie in Norway
Posts: 60
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was talking with a young USMC F-18 pilot at the Reno Air Races a couple of years ago, he was looking forward to his exchange posting to fly with the RAAF, said it was the best ("a dream") posting for a US F-18 pilot.

I still remember that RAAF Mirage losses in the late 1960s and early 1970s seemed to be fairly common, not all were related to problems with the aircraft.

cheers,

-John
D John is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 18:57
  #9 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice one - he gave me the model of his F4E that his crew chief (I think) had made for him when I was an awe struck 8 yr old back in 1977! Great guy - last caught up with him a couple of years ago when I was passing through Hill AFB.



StopStart is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 19:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Scimitar in RN service lost close to 50% of those built. There wasnt even a war on.
4Greens is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 20:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,503
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Not forgetting 890 Meteors were lost.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 22:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,037
Received 2,912 Likes on 1,247 Posts
The Scimitar in RN service lost close to 50% of those built. There wasnt even a war on.
Hmmm have you seen the film of the sad demise of Cmd Russell as he went over the side but was unable to get the canopy open, the film is on the Pathe site, I won't post the link because it shows the poor guy dying... The press were there to film the arrival of the first Scimitar on the Carrier.... I couldn't believe it had actually been shown on newsreels at the time.... Tragic loss.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 22:28
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,281
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
RAN lost nearly 50% of their A-4's in accidents...
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2012, 22:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I was in ANZUK 1974-76, one of the many other nationals of my acquaintance was a RN guy who told me he was the only survivor of his wings course, all peacetime flying casualties.
Samuel is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2012, 02:13
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAN lost nearly 50% of their A-4's in accidents...
In the days when the RAN had FW FJ and HMAS Melbourne had a flat top, the word was that RAN A4 pilots were not allowed to land on USN carriers because they didn't have the proper USN certification and security clearance etc - and USN pilots weren't allowed to land on 'Melbourne' because it was too ****ing dangerous!! (Melbourne had a VERY small deck.) The Tracker, (the RAN's ASW FW aircraft after the Gannet) had a ridiculously small wing tip clearance on the Melbourne's island, even if absolutely on centreline.

A mate went in off Melbourne's bow in a A4 after a cold cat launch and waited until Melbourne steamed over him before exiting the cockpit (from about 90' under, I'm told). He said afterwards that as he waited to pop the canopy and get himself out, he kept saying to himself: "Thank God it's not the 'Enterprise'."

Back to Mirages, there's at least one Oz ex Mirage driver still alive and well (JK) who stepped out of a Miracle twice, in JK's case, both times into the sea - and not a balmy flat (nor warm) sea either.
Wiley is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2012, 03:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: nocte volant
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm have you seen the film of the sad demise of Cmd Russell as he went over the side but was unable to get the canopy open, the film is on the Pathe site, I won't post the link because it shows the poor guy dying... The press were there to film the arrival of the first Scimitar on the Carrier.... I couldn't believe it had actually been shown on newsreels at the time.... Tragic loss.
That truley is a sad piece of footage. It's still not known why he didn't eject. He was unable to release the canopy due to fouling of the release, but the seat would still have worked, reportedly; even under water. Also, there was no diver to use the external release or help to the pilot to escape. Alas, times have changed.

A mate went in off Melbourne's bow in a A4 after a cold cat launch and waited until Melbourne steamed over him before exiting the cockpit (from about 90' under, I'm told). He said afterwards that as he waited to pop the canopy and get himself out, he kept saying to himself: "Thank God it's not the 'Enterprise'."
Second time that happened I think the pilot ejected before the aircraft even got wet! His story is just as gripping!

Seriously, aircraft reliability and safety has come leaps and bounds since the days of the Mirage. Compare the records of Wessex or even Seaking to Seahawk.
Trojan1981 is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2012, 05:54
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Interesting thread - questions answered... tks guys.
tartare is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2012, 07:47
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After Russell's accident all the systems were modified to allow underwater ejection.
4Greens is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2012, 19:04
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,037
Received 2,912 Likes on 1,247 Posts
I wonder if the fact the Helicopter was overhead prevented his use of the seat.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2012, 20:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then there was the knuck who stepped out on departure from, I believe, a departure from YPDN to the east after a flame-out. The jet stabilised after the pilto ad seat left and dead-sticked itself nicely into a mudflat. Last time I was in DN, the jet was still in the hangar.
HamFan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.