Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

A `cut` too far for the USAF?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

A `cut` too far for the USAF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th April 2012 | 21:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 584
Likes: 34
From: Threshold 06
A `cut` too far for the USAF?

USAF to rebuild its aerospace physiology expertise

I guess we still have RAFCAM...
oldmansquipper is offline  
Reply
Old 11th April 2012 | 07:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: South Central UK
Hah! Dream on - the UK has cut this area almost to extinction.

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Reply
Old 11th April 2012 | 22:32
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 584
Likes: 34
From: Threshold 06
LM - Indeed. Perhaps all we can hope for is the belief that what the US does - we tend to do do a few years later
oldmansquipper is offline  
Reply
Old 12th April 2012 | 06:03
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 156
From: Westnoreastsouth
There is usually a USAF Flight surgeon/pilot on exchange at RAFCAM,they value and enjoy their time here with us !
longer ron is offline  
Reply
Old 12th April 2012 | 06:14
  #5 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 5
From: Chabanais, France
they value and enjoy their time here with us
Of course they do, look at the extent of the material they have to work with!
parabellum is offline  
Reply
Old 12th April 2012 | 07:35
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,397
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
During GIANT VOICE 1979, we had a presentation from a US flight surgeon about some fantastic new high altitude flying clothing he'd recently come across. It was practical and relatively comfortable, certainly more so than the pressure suits the USAF was then using.

It was the Mk21 regulator, P/Q mask and pressure jerkin AEA the RAF had been using for years........

He admitted then, that RAF research and development in the field of flying clothing was well ahead of the USAF's.
BEagle is online now  
Reply
Old 12th April 2012 | 15:30
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 11
From: South East of Penge
Quite true Beags- Indeed the RAF IAM ( as was) designed Air Ventilated Suit was adopted by NASA in the early years of their Space programme.
I do recall quite a few expressions of bemusement by our aviation doctors regarding some of the American solutions to Aviation Medicine problems.
Haraka is offline  
Reply
Old 12th April 2012 | 20:26
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 156
From: Westnoreastsouth
Of course they do, look at the extent of the material they have to work with!
It is a full time flying appointment for them,typically they might come from an F16 or A10 background but I can assure you that they enjoyed the flying and tasks assigned to RAFCAM.
The RAF pilot (Flt Cdr) on CAM is not a Doctor - so therefore having a fully qualified USAF Doctor who is also an experienced military pilot is very useful and both 'sides' have gained from this arrangement !!
longer ron is offline  
Reply
Old 12th April 2012 | 20:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 632
Likes: 3
From: UK
The capability RAFCAM could provide has been slowly whittled away over the past 10 yrs+. For example, the move out of Farnbrough and the sale of QQ saw the loss of CHS. this was a world renowned R&D capability that lead the way in many areas of AvMed tech. QQ then off loaded due to it not making sufficient profit.......somewhere in that debacle is a monumental cockup, and as with any capabilities, now lost forever!
Could be the last? is offline  
Reply
Old 12th April 2012 | 21:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: South Central UK
The monumental cock-up occurred in the early 1990s, disbandment of the RAF IAM and the RAE, both irreplaceable organisations. Again, stupidity of the highest order exercised by politicians and senior military officers listening to siren voices assuring that it could all be done much cheaper by other means. Well is has not been cheaper, strategic capabilities have been thrown away and that Great White Elephant QinetiQ is falling apart.

lm
lightningmate is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.