New Toy
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: EU
New Toy
Q. What do you do if your lagacy F18s are running out of life?
A. Buy a heap of recently modified jets from an ally whose politicians say they no longer need them, at a cut down price as spares for your existng fleet of the same type.
Q,What do you do when you have the ally's jets?
A. Forget the idea of using them as spares but stand up two squadrons of the Harrier 2's to complement your existing fleet of Harrier AV8B's.
Yes that is what is happening on the other side of the pond. The USMC have had an amazing bargain as a result of "Call me Dave" 's decision 18 months ago.
Are the UK Media aware of this amazing c*ck up?
Do you think that our cousins are going to offer us a sweetheart deal on the F35 as a thank you for this friendly way of replacing the ancent F18s?
Answers on a post card
A. Buy a heap of recently modified jets from an ally whose politicians say they no longer need them, at a cut down price as spares for your existng fleet of the same type.
Q,What do you do when you have the ally's jets?
A. Forget the idea of using them as spares but stand up two squadrons of the Harrier 2's to complement your existing fleet of Harrier AV8B's.
Yes that is what is happening on the other side of the pond. The USMC have had an amazing bargain as a result of "Call me Dave" 's decision 18 months ago.
Are the UK Media aware of this amazing c*ck up?
Do you think that our cousins are going to offer us a sweetheart deal on the F35 as a thank you for this friendly way of replacing the ancent F18s?
Answers on a post card
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Australia
I do not think it is any big deal, for the last seventy odd years the USMC has been on our side.
There were no conditions of sale which said they could not be used in a combat role.
I would rather see them flying and helping keep world peace than rotting in some scrape yard.
Good luck to them, shame we did not buy some too,
At least the USMC does not have to put up with MP's who cannot see past their finger tips.
Regards
Col
There were no conditions of sale which said they could not be used in a combat role.
I would rather see them flying and helping keep world peace than rotting in some scrape yard.
Good luck to them, shame we did not buy some too,
At least the USMC does not have to put up with MP's who cannot see past their finger tips.
Regards
Col
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 18
From: Southern Europe
Well, did we really expect anything different? We knew we were giving them away and what our 'cousins' use their new toys for is pretty much up to them. That doesn't make it all any better, but I don't suppose Mr C will have anything to say. The only important thing to him was to get another type off the books to shed all the expensive support, etc.
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: The Whyte House
That's a bit "far reaching"... More like the end of their dicks...
The last poli with any balls was Mrs T.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Oh, the irony...
Imagine how much more embarassing it will be for HMG, MOD and the senior command echalon when Uncle Sam's Misguided Children use the same number of aircraft to generate a significantly higher FE@R than JFH did; when they have them MAU-MEU capable / deployable in greater numbers; when they assimilate more ordnance onto them than they had as RAF owned machines (gun pack, JDAM, AMRAAM?) and also when they are deployed on Ops.
It would be even crueler if they upgrade some to a 2+ type spec.
Would we ever send a British service member on an exchange with them to fly? After all, it was only July last year when the last RN pilot flew one and it mght be useful seedcorn experience for maritime ops even if we don't go for the B model after Call Me Dave's independent review (pun intended).
I suppose the Corps have supported the Harrier from very early in the game, so no suprise that they would want more. Semper Fidelis? I somehow think that they are.
Echoing the comment above, I would love to see the 'exiles' flying again and not just stripped for parts.
It would be even crueler if they upgrade some to a 2+ type spec.
Would we ever send a British service member on an exchange with them to fly? After all, it was only July last year when the last RN pilot flew one and it mght be useful seedcorn experience for maritime ops even if we don't go for the B model after Call Me Dave's independent review (pun intended).
I suppose the Corps have supported the Harrier from very early in the game, so no suprise that they would want more. Semper Fidelis? I somehow think that they are.
Echoing the comment above, I would love to see the 'exiles' flying again and not just stripped for parts.
Last edited by Finnpog; 5th April 2012 at 06:59.
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,398
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Would we ever send a British service member on an exchange with them to fly?
With a look of pained incredulity on his face he replied "Run? Did you say 'run'? My dear chap, British officers don't run - it would simply panic the troops!".
But that was long before the jockstappers with their Kraft durch Freude mentality pervaded the RAF.
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,138
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Totally off topic, but on a similar vein, I remember the one of the USMC General visiting the range to see new recruits, stopping as he went along he would ask " you have a hoard of Vietcong coming over the hill at you and you have a jam, what would you do?" each replied "Belt off, clear stoppage.. Belt on...carry on." eventually he reached a seasoned veteran with more medals than John Wayne, asking again the vet replied " Belt off... Pack off and **** off."
Last edited by NutLoose; 5th April 2012 at 22:26.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 2
From: Stamford
Sorry, failing to see the problem here.
We didn't scrap them because they were incapable (they are anything but). We scrapped them because we couldn't afford to upkeep two different aircraft types (GR4 + GR9).
Since USMC already have the same aircraft type in service why shouldn't they use them as "real" aircraft? Perfectly sensible decision.
We didn't scrap them because they were incapable (they are anything but). We scrapped them because we couldn't afford to upkeep two different aircraft types (GR4 + GR9).
Since USMC already have the same aircraft type in service why shouldn't they use them as "real" aircraft? Perfectly sensible decision.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Western Australia
finnpog wrote
<<I suppose the Corps have supported the Harrier from very early in the game ...>>
Pity they didn't buy them instead of making them themselves - would have helped our industry and piggy bank
<<I suppose the Corps have supported the Harrier from very early in the game ...>>
Pity they didn't buy them instead of making them themselves - would have helped our industry and piggy bank
Joined: Dec 2007
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 156
From: Westnoreastsouth
Pity they didn't buy them instead of making them themselves
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 379
Likes: 1
From: In a world of my own.
Walter Kennedy
Pity they didn't buy them instead of making them themselves - would have helped our industry and piggy bank
Aaron.
Do a Hover - it avoids G
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
From: Chichester West Sussex UK
Eliminating false information
Every Harrier I (defined as having a 201 sq ft metal wing) was made and test flown in the UK. None were made elswhere.
When it comes to the Harrier II (230 sq ft plastic wing) every wing and cockpit was made in the US. Every rear fuse, tailplane, engine and reaction controls was made in the UK.
Final assembly for Harrier II was in the UK for UK customers and in the US for US customers. Neither country was able to make the whole aircraft.
When it comes to the Harrier II (230 sq ft plastic wing) every wing and cockpit was made in the US. Every rear fuse, tailplane, engine and reaction controls was made in the UK.
Final assembly for Harrier II was in the UK for UK customers and in the US for US customers. Neither country was able to make the whole aircraft.
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: The Whyte House
Neither country was able to make the whole aircraft.
Either nation could have made it, the whole goddam caboodle. The agreement, for whatever boring reason that I have no interest in, was not to.
