No cats and flaps ...... back to F35B?
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midlands
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am also probably missing something in all the discussion as to the extensive costs of bringing a tanker capability to F35. On the Super Hornet it is a tank that fits on the normal centerline tank pylon and can be fitted to any of the jets. Then it's a case of adding extra fuel tanks depending on how much give is required. Doesn't stop that jet still being a regular Super Hornet the next day.
Last edited by Justanopinion; 17th Jul 2012 at 13:57.
Would someone confirm that the implementation of a buddy-buddy AAR capability (supply and receive) involves somewhat more than just bolting on a piece of legacy equipment? In my experience, a re-fuelling pod does not contain any fuel and would need a 'wet pylon' plus the associated control systems and safety features to work.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midlands
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would someone confirm that the implementation of a buddy-buddy AAR capability (supply and receive) involves somewhat more than just bolting on a piece of legacy equipment? In my experience, a re-fuelling pod does not contain any fuel and would need a 'wet pylon' plus the associated control systems and safety features to work.
Last edited by Justanopinion; 17th Jul 2012 at 14:16.
Thread Starter
The point about the aar is not whether it's difficult or not, but was it really needed in one option and not the other? If so why? Might be a complicated answer....might not!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sussex
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was needed in one option (-C/EMALS) but not the other (-B) to bump up the cost of the first to justify the selection of the second...?
Not a complicated answer, just complicated politics (sadly, all our own)?
Not a complicated answer, just complicated politics (sadly, all our own)?
Last edited by ColdCollation; 17th Jul 2012 at 17:42.
F35B Numbers
According to the SofS, the UK is only to buy 48:
Britain, U.S. hail F-35 fighter as tightening ties | Reuters
First official reduction from the 138 figure that I've seen.
Britain, U.S. hail F-35 fighter as tightening ties | Reuters
First official reduction from the 138 figure that I've seen.
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If we read all that report it states at the bottom..
Hammond told Reuters before his speech that Britain ultimately planned to buy an unspecified number of additional F-35 models after deciding - as early as 2015 or as late as 2020 - on a mix of manned and unmanned aircraft to replace its multirole Eurofighter Typhoon fighters.
According to the SofS, the UK is only to buy 48:
Britain, U.S. hail F-35 fighter as tightening ties | Reuters
First official reduction from the 138 figure that I've seen.
Britain, U.S. hail F-35 fighter as tightening ties | Reuters
First official reduction from the 138 figure that I've seen.
There's no official confirmation of this '48' number in offficial MoD releases - eg at:
Ministry of Defence | Defence News | Equipment and Logistics | UK takes delivery of first Lightning II fighter jet
As Jacko rightly points out, no official source has come out with that number.
One suspects that the "48" has been extrapolated by a journo source from the number of GR4, the aircraft that it is supposed to "replace". The requirement to provide Carrier Strike will be on top of that GR4 number, remember it was the "type" retired, not the requirement, which merely lapsed due to no suitable aircraft type.
Or so one would hope......
One suspects that the "48" has been extrapolated by a journo source from the number of GR4, the aircraft that it is supposed to "replace". The requirement to provide Carrier Strike will be on top of that GR4 number, remember it was the "type" retired, not the requirement, which merely lapsed due to no suitable aircraft type.
Or so one would hope......
Beady Eye
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like inspired guesswork
Very close to halfway between the total numbers of FA2 built (52) and initial GR5 production (41)
In the case of the GR5, more were built later as different marks - probably the same will apply to the F-35
Very close to halfway between the total numbers of FA2 built (52) and initial GR5 production (41)
In the case of the GR5, more were built later as different marks - probably the same will apply to the F-35
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As per my post the Defence Minister has confirmed the first order fo4r 48 but has not given any further numbers for any subsequent orders.. This is a complete and utter NON news story Far be it for me to suggest our Minister might be mistaken regarding the replacement of the Typhoon. Could he have simply thought of an aircraft beginning with the letter 'T' and just got it wrong?
Far be it for me to suggest our Minister might be mistaken regarding the replacement of the Typhoon. Could he have simply thought of an aircraft beginning with the letter 'T' and just got it wrong?
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Jackonicko,
My BAD
Many apologies and I got carried away with my wishful thinking..
MANY apologies for my misleading comment... Slap wrist jobbies
My BAD
Many apologies and I got carried away with my wishful thinking..
a day before Britain receives the jet's first international delivery. Britain is to formally accept an F-35 test model at Lockheed's Fort Worth, Texas, production plant on Thursday. The Pentagon seized the occasion to voice strong support for the plane, which is over budget, behind schedule and a potential target for cuts by lawmakers. The delivery reflects "considerable strides" in the program, particularly in the past year, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told a Pentagon press conference alongside Philip Hammond, his British counterpart. "The F-35 represents, I believe, the future of tactical aviation for both of our armed services" and would help ensure "our dominance of the skies for years to come," he said. Hammond, Britain's secretary of state for defense, cited joint work on the F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing model -- of which Britain plans to buy 48 -- as one of the "crucial keystones" of what he called Britain's most important defense relationship.
MANY apologies for my misleading comment... Slap wrist jobbies
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BBC News - UK receives first F-35 stealth fighter jet from US
BBC are now quoting 48 as an initial commitment.
What does 48 mean in the context of the F35? With a production line open and ready to make up attrition down the line, surely the FEAR ratio of that 48 should be higher? Is this therefore already sufficient to meet requirements for the carrier strike role (12 usually, up to 36 in a crisis)?
The UK / RAF could return for A models at a later date.....
BBC are now quoting 48 as an initial commitment.
What does 48 mean in the context of the F35? With a production line open and ready to make up attrition down the line, surely the FEAR ratio of that 48 should be higher? Is this therefore already sufficient to meet requirements for the carrier strike role (12 usually, up to 36 in a crisis)?
The UK / RAF could return for A models at a later date.....
Last edited by hulahoop7; 20th Jul 2012 at 07:00.