Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Ship attack anyone?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Ship attack anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Mar 2012, 10:27
  #21 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Given the limits of current sensor technology, sure this is good enough?

Navaleye is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 10:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 577
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
New gun...

Ahhh - but will it fit on Victory (probably the only `boat` to survive the next tranche of Camerons follies) and will it demast the frenchies as well as chain shot?

These and other questions....

oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 11:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Isn't this where someone (please!) reposts the 4 Buccaneers low level over the sea, to the background of Vangelis!!
Wander00 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 15:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: warwickshire
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What really amazes me is the gun recoil....or lack of it.
Clearly, the recoil is more linear along the 'barrel' than a traditional explosive given, but we are accelerating a 5kg projectile to 5,000m/s ish.
giblets is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 16:19
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,643
Received 54 Likes on 37 Posts
Buccaneers - 1978 Footage

Wander00,

There you go (but Kings of Leon soundtrack instead of Vangelis).

Great aircraft, great crews, great times !


Last edited by RAFEngO74to09; 1st Mar 2012 at 16:55.
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 16:42
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Giblets

Wikipedia say:-

" The recoil force exerted on the rails is equal and opposite to the force propelling the projectile. The seat of the recoil force is still debated. The traditional equations predict that the recoil force acts on the breech of the railgun. Another school of thought invokes Ampère's force law and asserts that it acts along the length of the rails (which is their strongest axis). The rails also repel themselves via a sideways force caused by the rails being pushed by the magnetic field, just as the projectile is. The rails need to survive this without bending, and must be very securely mounted."

I'll bet
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 17:06
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
RAFEngo - many thanks - never flew the aeroplane but have a great affection for it

W
Wander00 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 17:09
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,866
Received 335 Likes on 117 Posts
Isn't this where someone (please!) reposts the 4 Buccaneers low level over the sea, to the background of Vangelis!!
Wander00 - here's the original (and best):


One or two PPRuNers might just recognise the dashing young fellows who appear in the end credits!
BEagle is online now  
Old 1st Mar 2012, 18:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks Beagle

W
Wander00 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 21:22
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spain
Age: 81
Posts: 57
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very stirring stuff about the aircraft but the producers of the film obviously know nothing about what happens on a ship under attack!
kkbuk is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 23:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fox3WheresMyBanana

Shielding is highly conductive, dissipating the external field as eddy currents.

That's a copper box to you, chief.
Not so copper F3 - good old fashioned iron, but steel will do and is much cheaper. Copper will interact with a strong magnetic field, because of the Lenz Effect, but it won't shield a magnet. You need a ferrous metal to concentrate the flux lines.

A mobile MRI is basically a 40ft trailer with a 15,000 Gauss magnet inside, but the field will barely extended outside the sides of the van. A few Gauss maybe, but not much. That's because of about three tons of steel sheets on either side of the magnet. The copper box round round an MRI is the Faraday cage, to shield the magnet from external radio frequencies and the outside world from the magnet!

In the Lenz Effect, a copper plate, about 30cm x 37.5cm x 3mm stood on end at the end of the patient table will, if released, fall over. No brainer. But if stood on the table in the bore of the magnet, it will fall over if released - s'gravity innit? - but it will take about forty seconds to do it! It is a really cool demonstration of the power of an MRI magnet.

Doubt if the power for a rail gun will be a battery, you can't discharge it fast enough, more like capacitor banks, charged from the reactor/ generator and 'fired' into the magnet coils. I'm not sure if it would be possible to use superconducting magnets, because it would be hell on wheels (or impossibly expensive) to keep the LHe around the coils from quenching.

My use for the railgun would be to slowly accelerate loads to escape velocity over, say, twenty miles and up a mountain. I was always a fan of Issac Asimov.

Roger.
Landroger is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 23:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My use for the railgun would be to slowly accelerate loads to escape velocity over, say, twenty miles and up a mountain. I was always a fan of Issac Asimov.

An interesting use for Shap or Beattock....?
Milo Minderbinder is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 00:04
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 100
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be honest, I'm more interested in the picture of the "Goblin" parasite fighter above this article.

Am I sad or what?
stumpey is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 00:18
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Navaleye - very interesting.

Thanks for the input Landroger,

see http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA386044

for part of the US Army's research.

I shall amend "copper box" to "mostly copper box" to keep you happy.

Reminds me of H2G2 entry for Earth being amended from "harmless" to "mostly harmless".

Still a nifty weapon once they can get it into production.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 05:51
  #35 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 841
Received 49 Likes on 26 Posts
Why in the name of Cthulhu does this board's SW render the acronym formed by "Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation" as "l@ser"?
Try L.a.n.d. R.o.v.e.r. ! (without the spaces or fullstops).It translates that to Trabant.
TWT is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 13:37
  #36 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Slight thread creep, but does anybody remember that great stirrer of world effluent, the Iraqi 'Supergun' or pipeline, dependent on whether it was intelligence experts or ordinary eyes upon it.

Sat on the airfield at Lyneham for god knows how long - Looked like a pipeline to me.
AR1 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 15:03
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BEags - did you like the gloves!!

kkbuk - at the time, those on the ship were also a little clueless
jindabyne is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 18:20
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F3WheresMyBanana

Thanks for the link, as riveting as most scientific papers are! I think the 'shielding' they were trying to design/quantify/ research, was against an EMP, I think and not 'shield' a magnet. Two different problems, but with common areas of interest.

We use steel shielding to concentrate the magnetic field - sort of squeezing it through an easier path - to reduce the strength of any stray fields. Say, into a public corridor is quite common. We cannot expose 'the public' to as much as 5 Gauss.

At the same time, all MRIs are surrounded by a Faraday cage - often copper, but sometimes aluminium - to prevent stray RF frequencies, like police/ fire/ambulances, ATC and the aeroplanes themselves, even ships on the Thames operating radar, never mind the BBC et al, getting in to the sensitive receivers in the system. Conversely, the cage also protects people and the BBC from 20Kw bursts of RF energy at Medium wave frequencies, that are used to 'excite your protons'.

A rail gun like that one, would produce an enormous EMP and the shielding would have to be quite special - both magnetic shielding and electromagnetic shielding.

As you say, a nifty bit of kit though.

Roger.
Landroger is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2012, 18:50
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Landroger - thanks for the further detail. Very educational.

BEagle - thanks for the memories. Used to borrow this video endlessly in flying training. Had ex-Bucc QFIs throughout, got offered Buccaneer...and finally ended up flying on Open Gate out of Gib in the F3, escorting or trying to catch the b#ggers. Odd to think it's all to be done by rail gun 'death-rays' soon.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2012, 14:50
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edinburgh and 3C
Age: 72
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LowObservable:
Why in the name of Cthulhu does this board's SW render the acronym formed by "Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation" as "l@ser"?
It seems the adbots pick it up and offer to sell the bloody things so that scrotes can buy them with their drugs money and try to blind pilots for fun.
MagnusP is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.