Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Prince Harry - Apache Pilot

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Prince Harry - Apache Pilot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Feb 2012, 10:05
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quality Royals

There is some unfair stuff drifting in here, we should be proud the Royals are doing their stuff in harms way

Both Princes are a credit to our country, each according to his character; one thoughtful hard working totally dedicated and the other a dashing sort. We can all see bits of the person we would like to be in each of them

The trainers have the same problem as other fields, nursing, driving, painting et all; the worst outcome is; you sign them up and it goes wrong

No doubt this is especially to be avoided now and so they are likely to have been carefully scrutenised and corrected where necessary

In peacetime those joining squadrons could expect a fair workup to a war footing but present joiners may be "at the front right" smartly
Tinribs is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 10:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good on them both. I very much doubt they required special treatment. They seem to be made of good stuff, just like their recent forebears. Prince Edward not getting his green hat only serves to reinforce the point (and all power to him for trying).

I think it would also be a huge boost to moral if Pippa was to join up.
oggers is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 10:23
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fantastic that both the princes have qualified on such demanding courses despite having so many high-profile commitments and distractions not suffered by others. I'm sure they share the same personal concerns, too.

BZ to both of them.
FODPlod is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 10:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Back from the sandpit
Age: 63
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's just possible Harry takes after his uncle. Andrew was a very able pilot and QWI.
And his father was a Challenger Tank commander in GW1
Top Bunk Tester is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 10:41
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Herts.
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't fully agree with Training Risky's argument, but he had made one statement that I'm in full agreement with:

Originally Posted by Training Risky
due to their status as royal princes they will NEVER be just another officer or just another pilot.
Prince Harry has already been prevented from serving with his unit in Afghanistan amid the fears that he would be a high-profile target and therefore increase the risk to himself and to his men. Prince Harry had trained with his troop, and was aghast to be told that he couldn't serve with them.

I believe that Prince Harry is as capable as any officer in the British Army, and I daresay that he won his award on merit alone. However, media interest will probably prevent him from ever deploying on dangerous operations.

Its also the same with Prince William. Just a brief look at his service history shows unique experience. Afterall, how many officers have served in the Royal Navy, the British Army and the Royal Air Force?
The Heff is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 10:52
  #26 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,096
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can someone answer me a question ,
It's reported that the prince has qualified as a "pilot" but in the link on the BBC website.he's sitting in the front seat of the apache. Is that not the WO position? And the fact he won a Award for top of his class for shooting ?
Maybe one qualifies in that position and gets promoted to the Pilot's seat later? It would be ideal if both crew had a very comprehensive knowledge of what is required, yes?

The Apache course in the USA may possibly sort out those who are best in which seat?

Does anybody know?, does it matter?

God bless the pair of them for stepping up to the plate.
parabellum is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 10:59
  #27 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by airborne_artist
It's just possible Harry takes after his uncle. Andrew was a very able pilot and QWI.
Not to forget that daddy and granddad were also accomplished pilots flying all sorts like 146 and Nimrod.

Why Granddad like nothing better than flying a Nimrod from Sandringham to Balmoral
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 11:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,296
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Its also the same with Prince William. Just a brief look at his service history shows unique experience. Afterall, how many officers have served in the Royal Navy, the British Army and the Royal Air Force?
Just proves the fellow cannot hold a job!
SASless is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 11:56
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Back from the sandpit
Age: 63
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to forget that daddy and granddad were also accomplished pilots flying all sorts like 146 and Nimrod.
Accomplished?

http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/65F3C...00_29jun94.pdf
Top Bunk Tester is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 12:55
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,133
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
these guys have achieved something that c 95% of the population have not got the ability to do!
Aye, but as 95 per cent of the population don't lead the 'Jim'll Fix It' lifestyle of these pampered princes I guess we'll never know.


they passed their courses through their own efforts, just like everyone else.
While they may have passed their courses through their own efforts (and this is debatable), it certainly wasn't their own efforts that got them onto their courses in the first place.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 12:57
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prince Harry has already been prevented from serving with his unit in Afghanistan amid the fears that he would be a high-profile target and therefore increase the risk to himself and to his men. Prince Harry had trained with his troop, and was aghast to be told that he couldn't serve with them.

I believe that Prince Harry is as capable as any officer in the British Army, and I daresay that he won his award on merit alone. However, media interest will probably prevent him from ever deploying on dangerous operations.
Worth pointing out that he did actually do 10 weeks of ops out there before the media blackout was violated by johnny foreigner.
oggers is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 13:07
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"While they may have passed their courses through their own efforts (and this is debatable), it certainly wasn't their own efforts that got them onto their courses in the first place."

Can't penalise him for who his parents are.

And I am sure the Military gets plenty of free advertising mileage out of them being in the armed forces and serving in the various services so it cuts both ways.

Would the top brass really have put Capt Wales onto the Apache course if they didn't think he had the aptitude / skills to at least have a good chance of passing ?
Considering the media interest, I think putting him on the course and having him wash out would not have been a good look and he maybe would have been "steered" in another direction.
500N is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 13:12
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Anglia.
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it interesting, one brother seeks to save lives, the other to take lives.
Avitor is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 13:14
  #34 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Top Bunk Tester
Accomplished?
Sorry, I missed off irony in my post. Sandringham to Bamloral should have given the clue.

Anyway, thank you for the link for those unaware of the Bonny Prince's exploits.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 13:17
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
And his father was a Challenger Tank commander in GW1
Yawn
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 13:27
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Maybe Princes do get some slack in flying hours, if in the opinion of the QFIs / QWIs they will come good in the end. This is no different to ordinary mortals, and I was bloody grateful for this myself in training.

As to the media stuff - they always sit pilots in the front of any aircraft, any aircraft with two crew has two pilots, and it doesn't matter how many times you tell them otherwise. They have a stereotype, and neither they nor the RAF PR types are prepared to change that. Since the stereotype is that we are "The Few" with a bit of "Top Gun" mixed in, it's not worth arguing about.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 13:54
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stuff on here would be better in the Daily Mirror. These 'insights' are similar to the crazy conspiracy theories of who killed Princess Diana - did MI6 really do it and surely we should be told? Whether MI6 would have done it or not turned out to be irrelevant - they did not have to as a drunken French driver in the pay of her idle layabout boyfriend's corrupt and decadent Egyptian father did the job for them. Similarly, you can argue whether or not Royal Princes would be unfairly helped through flying training or not, should the need arise. Boring as it is for the conspiracy theorists to accept, they have not had to as they have made it comfortably through under their own steam. As others have wisely said, no one would publicly speculate about their colleagues' ability on here - why do it with Prince Harry? He has proven himself to be a popular and capable officer who has won prizes for his ability. You can only hide a lack of ability for so long - if you hand out flying and gunnery prizes to someone who cannot fly a kite then someone, somewhere on one of his courses will let the cat out the bag. As that has not happened, I stand by the view that he is a competent guy who is serving his country in dangerous times - just as his Uncle did so willingly before him. If that were any other family in this country, we would applaud and admire it - I choose to do just that in Harry's case.
Genghis McCann is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 13:59
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Top Bunk Tester
One thing I've noticed about military websites in particular. They seem to be populated by professional paragons who have never put a foot wrong (or possibly never held that much responsibility for weighing, accepting and taking risks). Such 'perfect' posters appear eager to judge and come down like a ton of bricks on anyone 'guilty' of the least sign of human frailty, especially if it involves a royal prince or a similarly high-profile figure unable to respond in kind. Is it any surprise that we've become so risk-averse these days, both as a nation and as the armed forces? Hold people (and units/services) to account by all means but don't write them off professionally just because of an isolated incident.

Taking pride of place in my downstairs loo is a small framed section of the hull of a ship I impaled on a steel-capped pile during a particulary heavy berthing on a gusty Friday afternoon with an onshore Force 8 and no tugs available. This keepsake was presented to me by my ship's company when, still a relatively junior officer, I relinquished Command a year later. Why was my ship's company so appreciative? It was their final opportunity to take weekend leave after a long and demanding work-up before deploying east of Suez for eight months. By not standing off or going to anchor, they were in time to catch their trains home.

Fortunately for me, this was at a time when my entire competence and subsequent career weren't judged on the basis of a single incident. The damage was repaired by the time we left UK but I still received a well-deserved rollicking from CINCFLEET for breaking his ship.

Last edited by FODPlod; 9th Feb 2012 at 14:33.
FODPlod is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 14:09
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well done Harry Wales.

That mad Argentinan bitch would have something to moan about if we sent Harry instead of William!
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2012, 14:15
  #40 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,579
Received 435 Likes on 229 Posts
While we're on the subject, how many flex hours did each pilot receive? Was it more than Joe Bloggs on the same course?
Hopefully less than you....
ShyTorque is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.