Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Whatever happened to the 4-ship formation?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Whatever happened to the 4-ship formation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Nov 2011, 05:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts
Whatever happened to the 4-ship formation?

A few years ago it was more common to see a 4-ship rather than a singleton or pair of fast jets.

But now I can’t recall seeing more than a pair at low level in many a year.

Surely there is more to it than lack of airframes?
typerated is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 07:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We're flat broke like everyone else!
peppermint_jam is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 07:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no pilots to fly them
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 07:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,158
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
IF 4-ships were needed, they would be flown. Tactics and the requirements have changed...this is no longer the Cold war so 4-ships penetrating the IGB at low-level in defensive formation are not as necessary. What is necessary is training new crews in CAS for current ops. Once your op cycle is complete, then the other aspects of your capability can be practiced.

I flew a 4-ship recently. Have another one planned this week.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 08:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 902
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
maybe it reflects a change in the tactics that the crews are training for?
OvertHawk is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 09:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: in my own world
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 4 ship recovery was normally the biggest debrief point!
xray one is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 09:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was more nervous about the taxi plan myself!
L J R is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 09:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,158
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Loser Plan!
just another jocky is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 09:21
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jam and Jockey have it. it all comes down to hours and op requirements. IMHO it's a skill we're losing and it's a good way of stretching the youngsters. But times change and so must we.
Mach Two is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 09:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Frankly, Typerated, the whole fly pro is thinner than it was a few years ago. But we train for different missions. That said, M2 makes a good point. Once skills are lost it's hard to get them back if we ever need them again. Anyway, 4-ships do still happen, they're just not the main trg focus.
APG63 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 10:02
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brief a four ship, step as a three, taxi a pair and one into the departure end cable.....
L J R is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 10:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice one, LJR. So many times!
APG63 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 17:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, but's one hell of a formation.
APG63 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 20:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Swiss can do better.. a three ship with only a pair! LOL

Alber Ratman is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 20:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was pretty impressive, all 3 keeping everything together.

We'll see these Jet packs in use with the SEALS in the not too distant future.
500N is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2011, 21:55
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4 has to have advantages over 2 in terms of ACM surely? Next threats have to be Iran or proxy with China, so would have thought 4 ship would be coming back to the fore? Lets face it, we are on the wind down for Herrick, we might be ace at cas, but its a skillset that in the post stan environment that will be once forgotten.

Or did I just say jehovah?
VinRouge is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2011, 06:25
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts
I suppose the world has moved on from low-level penetration and dropping dumb bombs as the standard way of doing business.

Who would have thought that when the Tornado was entering service.
typerated is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2011, 21:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Salty Hammer 1990,
18 ship vs "Magic gave up counting at 150+".
I don't think we were the only large AD formation either.
Cracking fun!!
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2011, 14:33
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Very good,
except we recovered to 2 different bases and no-one landed min fuel ("I learned about big fuel reserves from that."). I think the point being made by others earlier was that:
1 We may be doing 2 ship CAS now, but the future (e.g. China, or a single big strike required against a nascent nuclear power ) might require big formations
2 If you don't practice these things, the skills die.
3 Wars tend to happen at inconvenient times and in awkward places, with little time for practice and even less time for regenerating dead skills.

I wonder whether we are doing the "other stuff" often enough to keep at least a core of aircrews at least familiar with such procedures. People shooting at you is no time to be reinventing the wheel.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2011, 15:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Northants
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
To all intents and purposes there's no such thing as an 8 ship or 16 ship. It resolves into units of four and as soon as things get messy they virtually operate autonomously. The difficult bit is the planning, deconfliction and taxy out - after that it all goes to a ball of chalk anyway!
Flap62 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.