Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

AIRTANKER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jan 2012, 14:29
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Anglia
Age: 74
Posts: 789
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Courtney, the quickest way to get Beags on to a thread is to mention Ms York!
1.3VStall is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 15:20
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Ah, of course. The lovely Susannah, I presume. Let's see if it works.

BEags, Susannah York. What do you think?
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 15:58
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
I say Courtney, do you mean:


Ooooh yes..

Greetings everyone! Happy New Year to one and all! Having been away in darkest Yorkshire visiting relatives, my vile cold and I are now back in the soft saarf after a quick blast down the Fosse Way in the teutonic tourer this morning. Saw a Typhoon zotting along at low level in Yorkshire earlier today, which was nice! Lucky blighter!

The thing one has to remember is that ATrS will be providing the Voyager to the RAF on a power-by-the-hour basis. The RAF thus still has never 'bought' a new tanker as they will only be renting the Voyager.

One wonders how ATrS' business case will work, now that there are no Harriers, SHARs, Tornado F3s or Nimrod MRA4s. There are fewer Tornados and Typhoons than were originally anticipated - so how often will the crews be flying the Voyager in the AAR role? Will there really be a Voyager sitting out in the open (it won't fit in the Timmy hangar) at RAF Mount Pleasant, flying a tiny number of hours per month? How much AT work will the Voyager do otherwise, given that the north-west frontier war won't go on for ever....hopefully?

Still, the A330 is jolly nice and will make an excellent tanker......eventually !

Oh - and always end with the 'pack shot':

BEagle is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 16:02
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
38 minutes, 1.3VStall. Not bad!
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 16:32
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Yes, sorry for the delay, but I had to get some more Kleenex first...

...for my cold, that is!


BEagle is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 19:47
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 859
Received 48 Likes on 23 Posts
The thing one has to remember is that ATrS will be providing the Voyager to the RAF on a power-by-the-hour basis.
True, but I understand that there is a guaranteed minimum requirement. The RAF pays if they don't use them and pays more if they require over and above the minimum.

A good deal for ATr (if they can get pilots).

However, the penalties are quite severe if they can't come up with the goods.
Saintsman is online now  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 20:31
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saintsman,

Bet there is a very clever little clause in there somewhere that counters that penalty option
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 20:32
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
"Will there really be a Voyager sitting out in the open (it won't fit in the Timmy hangar) at RAF Mount Pleasant,"

Why would "they" want to put it in a hangar overnight, when the thing is designed to last for years outside?

Hangars (for "Commercial" aircraft - and that is what these are) are only for working in, not for parking in overnight because it gets cold out. Coats are cheaper.

...I'll just get mine...
Rigga is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 20:45
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: tahiti
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATr can get pilots, just depends if they really need them.
winkle is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2012, 21:23
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,503
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Where those photographs taken at Akrotiri?
brakedwell is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 00:09
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: england
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rigga, to be instantly ready for "Q" duties, without having to mess around for hours sweeping snow off the wings before de-iceing etc.. Also gets pretty miserable doing long jobs outside at -15°!

The VC10 was often in the hangar during my 6 month stint darrn saarf (some might allude to the fact that it was U/S more often than not ) when the weather was set to be or was suitably offensive.
Kengineer-130 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 16:33
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Can anyone tell me what increase in capabilities the new aircraft will bring?
The RAF demonstrated a long range strike capability during recent operations over Libya. I'm sure in part this was designed to demonstrate to certain parties the UKs 'reach'. So if we take it to the extreme, does Airtanker allow the RAF to put a package of 4 GR4s with 2 Stormshadow each over the Falklands. Could it manage this with 1 - 2 tankers instead of the large number required for Black Buck?
ASI to MPA is about 3500nm, which is several times further than UK-Mediterranean! Furthermore, there are very few en-route diversion aerodromes, meaning that to maintain even a 4-bag Tornado above its abort fuel state would require probably 5 refuelling brackets. My guess is that it might be possible to deploy 2, maybe 3, 4-baggers from ASI-MPA at typical AAR trail speed / height with a Voyager using the usual tanker alternate for MPA and would take about 9 hours.

brakedwell, no - Almeria, I think.
BEagle is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 17:09
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: St. John's Wood
Posts: 322
Received 24 Likes on 4 Posts
Beags, and you have perhaps been there to lovingly touch the very rock upon which she sat?
Abbey Road is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 17:37
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If we could get over the pprune viagra-substitute digression, could anybody answer my question about how many hours per year a current RAF tanker crew would typically fly?

If AT salaries are less than the norm for long-haul A330 captains, they could perhaps still offer attractive terms if the annual hours target is more reasonable. Do RAF long-haul crews do approaching 900 hours per year?
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 17:39
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,503
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
I'm sure I saw that shapely rear in the Akrotiri ascot transit block
brakedwell is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 17:57
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Anglia
Age: 74
Posts: 789
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
brakedwell, I wish...............!
1.3VStall is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 18:02
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trim Stab:

Tanker crews don't get anywhere near 900 hrs / year.

In the past 12 months I got circa 500 hrs which included 60 Ellamy missions.

I reckon both Tri* and VC10 crews get in the region of 350 - 450 hrs / year
Chris Griffin is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 19:10
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Chris - If AT fly about the same those would probably be quite attractive terms to most long-haul pilots these days. Admittedly they presumably won't have so many SD's as regulars though.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2012, 19:25
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: location location
Posts: 89
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A MFF Airbus Captain in Charter world would be (fag packet) @500 hrs pa.
For this there is a salary @£110k+, PHI, 8x salary death in service, co pension of @15-20%, nice hotels and plenty of time off per year and per month.
If I was said Captain my choice would be to go half time at the airline and still earn more than an Airtanker crew
As has been said previously in this thread, the package needs to be extraordinary to winkle out Civvy pilots from their comfort zone.
charlies angel is online now  
Old 7th Jan 2012, 07:46
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not quite the full story...

Just a little caution with regard to hours comparisons advised I think. If you think that the fewer hours flown by RAF crews would therefore mean either more home time or perhaps the possibility of another low-hours job on another airline, you must not forget that those 300-400 years come with additional 'free' umpteen hours on q at Brize or Falklands, another something-teen weeks away each year on det, typically 3-4 weeks at a time for circa 20-30 hours flying...(Let's not include the Ellamy surge). So to summarise, the leisurely appearance of 3-400 hrs/year is more like the work hours of 900 a year once you factor in the legendary Ascot efficiency. Oh, and those who have left, forgotten and considering returning, don't forget that your schedule/roster will change 3-4times per day and if you're not in the vicinity of the desk 24hours a day then you life will be f@c£Ed about from pillar to post and you won't even know what you're doing next week reliably never mind in x-months time for your daughters/fathers/sisters christening/birthday/wedding etc...
FJ2ME is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.