Bomber Boys:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bevo,
You're right, and the chances of bailing out of a Lancaster (and indeed a Halifax) were made worse through a lack of available emergency exits. The act of getting away from one's crew position, strapping on a parachute, fighting through a narrow fuselage (and clambering over the main spar) and getting out of a small door at the rear of the fuselage could not have been easy. Mix with darkness, fire and perhaps the aircraft manoeuvering out of control and one can see why the loss rate in Bomber Command was disproportionally high. Oh for a decent escape hatch located in the forward fuselage.
American bomber crews had a much higher chance of escape, certainly from a B17. As well as more built-in exits, the crew could even egress directly through the open bomb bay. Of course, the B17 had design flaws, and the lack of a front turret in the early versions was quickly exploited by the Luftwaffe whose favoured tactics employed head-on attacks. The chances of the pilots was not helped by oxygen tanks located at head-height behind their seated positions! It took a while for the Luftwaffe to correlate the numbers of Army Air Corps air gunners who ended up in their POW camps compared to the front end crew (pilots, navigator and bombadier) who were killed in the head-on attacks. Later versions of course embodied the chin turret.
And then of course there was flak, which levelled the odds irrespective of the crew position.
You're right, and the chances of bailing out of a Lancaster (and indeed a Halifax) were made worse through a lack of available emergency exits. The act of getting away from one's crew position, strapping on a parachute, fighting through a narrow fuselage (and clambering over the main spar) and getting out of a small door at the rear of the fuselage could not have been easy. Mix with darkness, fire and perhaps the aircraft manoeuvering out of control and one can see why the loss rate in Bomber Command was disproportionally high. Oh for a decent escape hatch located in the forward fuselage.
American bomber crews had a much higher chance of escape, certainly from a B17. As well as more built-in exits, the crew could even egress directly through the open bomb bay. Of course, the B17 had design flaws, and the lack of a front turret in the early versions was quickly exploited by the Luftwaffe whose favoured tactics employed head-on attacks. The chances of the pilots was not helped by oxygen tanks located at head-height behind their seated positions! It took a while for the Luftwaffe to correlate the numbers of Army Air Corps air gunners who ended up in their POW camps compared to the front end crew (pilots, navigator and bombadier) who were killed in the head-on attacks. Later versions of course embodied the chin turret.
And then of course there was flak, which levelled the odds irrespective of the crew position.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Asia/Europe
Age: 64
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When reviewing the statistics...it should be remembered that take-off, landings and running out of fuel were far higher in the list of losses than enemy fire...
Ditching in the sea at night, having run out of fuel due to over range (less often) or bases with low visibilty (more often) probably cost more lives than any of the others....
Personally, great uncle had no bloody chance in a Hudson 1 with two Messers on his tail...While his uncle had all the luck (or frustration)...joing RFC in 1917 and retiring in 1937...guess that's the way life goes...for you or against you....
Ditching in the sea at night, having run out of fuel due to over range (less often) or bases with low visibilty (more often) probably cost more lives than any of the others....
Personally, great uncle had no bloody chance in a Hudson 1 with two Messers on his tail...While his uncle had all the luck (or frustration)...joing RFC in 1917 and retiring in 1937...guess that's the way life goes...for you or against you....
'55,573 killed out of a total of 125,000 aircrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Planet Google
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
November 4
Thank you for posting those photos.
The first one makes one remember how young they were.
All very sad.
TTN your story about the pilot with battle stress is also one of those overlooked but true facts that should never be forgotten.
amcp
Thank you for posting those photos.
The first one makes one remember how young they were.
All very sad.
TTN your story about the pilot with battle stress is also one of those overlooked but true facts that should never be forgotten.
amcp
Nov 4
Lovely photos. Re training accidents, I was at the Yorkshire Air Museum the other day, and they have a poignant map showing all aircraft crashes in the county. A large number of them were bomber training sorties.
Lovely photos. Re training accidents, I was at the Yorkshire Air Museum the other day, and they have a poignant map showing all aircraft crashes in the county. A large number of them were bomber training sorties.
I seem to recall reading somewhere that 10,000 died due to non-combat losses; ie, in training, accidents over the UK on returning from ops and such. Are those numbers part of the 55,000, or in addition to?
Quote: Yes they did - it's called the Aircrew Europe Star. No-one else got a "special" medal. Once you open that can of worms you'll be getting the Fighter Command Medal, The Coastal Command medal, the submarines medal, the commandos medal and the Uncle Tom Cobbleigh and all medal.
My understanding is that Aircrew Europe included ANY aircrew flying on ops. over hostile soil. This would of course include:
Fighter Command, Coastal Command and the FAA at least.
So, no medal for the Bomber boys as such.
My understanding is that Aircrew Europe included ANY aircrew flying on ops. over hostile soil. This would of course include:
Fighter Command, Coastal Command and the FAA at least.
So, no medal for the Bomber boys as such.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Or Fighter, or maritime, or merchant marine etc etc, only theatre medals.
Now no one, as far as I know, has campaigned for the proper award of the Burma and Pacific Star. Similarly no one has campaigned for a medal for the mercantile marine in the years immediately after the war when there was a significant risk from uncharted mine fields or drifting mines. Life rafts were not removed until around 1948-49.
Now no one, as far as I know, has campaigned for the proper award of the Burma and Pacific Star. Similarly no one has campaigned for a medal for the mercantile marine in the years immediately after the war when there was a significant risk from uncharted mine fields or drifting mines. Life rafts were not removed until around 1948-49.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PN,
You're quite correct about the escape hatch located under the Bomb Aimer's position. However, I understand it was relatively small, especially for a crew member togged up with flying gear, mae west and parachute. It was also still a struggle for the Nav and Wireless Operator to get right the nose of the aircraft as I understand their crew positions were located in a relatively central position of the fuselage, compared to the Halifax.
To put things into context, the stats for shot down bombers record that the number of men surviving a Lancaster crew averaged 1.3. The number from a Halifax, again assuming a 7 man crew, was 2.45. One reason for the higher number of Halifax crew survival rates may have been the Nav and Wireless Operator were located in the forward fuselage, under and ahead of the cockpit, and much closer to the forward escape hatch.
But whichever way you look at it, I can not imagine the horror of being in that situation, and I think night must have only have made the chances of survival even more slim.
You're quite correct about the escape hatch located under the Bomb Aimer's position. However, I understand it was relatively small, especially for a crew member togged up with flying gear, mae west and parachute. It was also still a struggle for the Nav and Wireless Operator to get right the nose of the aircraft as I understand their crew positions were located in a relatively central position of the fuselage, compared to the Halifax.
To put things into context, the stats for shot down bombers record that the number of men surviving a Lancaster crew averaged 1.3. The number from a Halifax, again assuming a 7 man crew, was 2.45. One reason for the higher number of Halifax crew survival rates may have been the Nav and Wireless Operator were located in the forward fuselage, under and ahead of the cockpit, and much closer to the forward escape hatch.
But whichever way you look at it, I can not imagine the horror of being in that situation, and I think night must have only have made the chances of survival even more slim.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 59
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ref casualties in training. A couple of years ago I was given a copy of the F540 for 9 Servicing Flying Training School, RAF Hullavington for September 1941
1/9/41 No 1149978 LAC Jansen VDJ (Dutch pupil) was killed as a result of a flying accident
10/9/41 No 1384580 LAC Shand-Kydd JVW (Pupil) was killed as a result of a flying accident
12/9/41 No 36 Course completed Flying Training. 2 Officers : 41 Airmen
13/9/41 No 40 Course arrived for fling instruction. 5 Officers : 45 Airmen. This intake included 5 Czech and 1 Dutch Pupil.
15/9/41 No 1290114 LAC Audsley T (Pupil) died as a result of a injuries received in a flying accident.
19/9/41 Flying Officer MF Scragg (70612) Instructor, and St Fyvie J, No. NZ403439 (Pupil) were killed as a result of a flying accident.
25/9/41 2/Lt AH Barlow (Army Pupil) was killed as a result of a flying accident.
19 Aircraft were written off or seriously damaged during the month as under:
Master 6 Written off 8 Seriously Damaged
Hurricane 1 Written Off 4 Seriously Damaged
10/9/41 No 1384580 LAC Shand-Kydd JVW (Pupil) was killed as a result of a flying accident
12/9/41 No 36 Course completed Flying Training. 2 Officers : 41 Airmen
13/9/41 No 40 Course arrived for fling instruction. 5 Officers : 45 Airmen. This intake included 5 Czech and 1 Dutch Pupil.
15/9/41 No 1290114 LAC Audsley T (Pupil) died as a result of a injuries received in a flying accident.
19/9/41 Flying Officer MF Scragg (70612) Instructor, and St Fyvie J, No. NZ403439 (Pupil) were killed as a result of a flying accident.
25/9/41 2/Lt AH Barlow (Army Pupil) was killed as a result of a flying accident.
19 Aircraft were written off or seriously damaged during the month as under:
Master 6 Written off 8 Seriously Damaged
Hurricane 1 Written Off 4 Seriously Damaged
Ladies and gentleman - we are privileged to have among this fraternity a former wartime 61 Sqn Lancaster crewman - Hugh Spencer. Perhaps we should, humbly, ask him how he had planned to afford a bit of distance between himself and a Lancaster. Are you there, Hugh, sir?
So, no medal for the Bomber boys as such.
Fair point, tankertrash. What was the opinion among the post-war 'heavy' crews, such as your own distinguished squadron when you were flying? Or is this all a latter-day, 'benefit of hindsight' push for a specific medal?
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am curious as to whether that difference is to the ability of escaping the aircraft flown.
Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,373
Received 119 Likes
on
86 Posts
Interesting programme.
One question however,and one I have never really been able to ascertain a definitive answer to.
How long, both in theory and in practice, would it have taken for a crew to complete a tour ?.
One question however,and one I have never really been able to ascertain a definitive answer to.
How long, both in theory and in practice, would it have taken for a crew to complete a tour ?.
When I was a Gnat stude, occasionally the chief MPBW / DOE bloke would turn up for a few quiet drinks in the OM. Any loud mouthed aspirant FJ stude who pontificated about 'the old blunty at the end of the bar' was soon put right - the old boy had been a Halifax pilot in the Second World War and had been blown out of his aircraft over a German city. He was one of the lucky ones; whilst 'in the bag' he had been treated fairly and properly. After the war he'd made friends with several of the inhabitants and would often pop over to stay with them.
Although once his wife remarked upon the spacious roads and well laid-out nature of the city to her hosts.... Whereupon the German replied "Ach Ja! But, you see, your husband was one of our chief town planners!".
Although once his wife remarked upon the spacious roads and well laid-out nature of the city to her hosts.... Whereupon the German replied "Ach Ja! But, you see, your husband was one of our chief town planners!".