Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

GUY GIBSON-SHOT DOWN BY THE RAF

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

GUY GIBSON-SHOT DOWN BY THE RAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Oct 2011, 08:31
  #21 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Geehovah
Hands up all air defenders who never took a "blue on blue" shot. Even with JTIDS its not impossible..
Without going in to too much detail I was priviledged to view a HVAA AD exercise. Defence was 4xF3 and attack was 4x4x4 F16.

The defence may be said to have won as the HVAA was never engaged. Three AAM were fired and two kills achieved. The only problem was the F16s never engaged nor were themselves engaged.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 08:45
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Starring at an Airfield Near you
Posts: 371
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
Forget which of the many books I've read covers the essence of gunners' policy, which boiled down to:

"Count the number of engines, if it's less than four - OPEN FIRE"
Downwind.Maddl-Land is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 11:47
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Count the number of engines, if it's less than four - OPEN FIRE"
Absolutely. RAF intruders used to 'fly with the pack' but kept a healthy distance away. Anyone flying a twin engined aircraft, in the dark inside the bomber stream is asking for trouble. There's also the school of thought that says he was changing over the fuel feed. But who knows.

If it happened, then it's sad. But GG would be well acquainted with the behaviour of and SOPs for gunners over hostile territory.

I can't see why any thinking person would want to blame the gunners . . . now if it were Lewis Hamilton . . . (oops)
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 18:35
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Anyone flying a twin engined aircraft, in the dark inside the bomber stream is asking for trouble.
If that is the case it must have been tough on the Wellington guys. Admittedly Lancs would probably be higher, but they could well be in among the Stirlings while these were still on Ops. Presumably this point would be covered at briefing when Wellingtons were involved on an Op, but on the "shoot first, ask questions later" principle some of them must have been friendly fire victims
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 21:39
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Age: 65
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Recent findings have suggested that Guy Gibson, Amy Johnson, Glen Miller and Douglas Bader were all downed by friendly fire (or in Glen Miller's case friendly bombs)

The Daily Mail also had the Guy Gibson story

Dambusters legend Guy Gibson was shot down by BRITISH airman | Mail Online

Very sad if true.
draglift is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 10:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
A good deal of sympathy for the gunner - it sounds as if the debriefers laid it on a bit thick with the "lost and trying to follow a bomber home".

Flying a twin-engine aircraft anywhere within effective .303 range of a bomber over hostile territory would seem to be less than smart, given bomber loss rates and the fact that everyone knew that there were ten Mosquitoes in the sky versus ****-knows how many Ju88s.

A bit like sneaking up on a rookie cop in a bad neighbourhood at 3am and yelling BOO!
LowObservable is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 11:49
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,048
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
You should read the full story in Britain at War, apparently when he was reported as lost a cheer is reputed to have gone up in the local pub as he was that hated amongst junior crews and groundcrew.. at one point even sabotage was suspected, but he swapped planes at the last moment so it was ruled out.

Indeed another article on some pilot that died doing a victory roll in a previous addition, it was stated that no one attended the funeral because they were so saddened by his loss, the next issue someone had come forward with evidence to suggest he was a bully to the Sgt pilots to the extent of ordering some of them to "participate in some of the japes where they were bullied" and one of the said Sgt pilots did a little dance amongst the burning wreckage of his plane before wandering off smiling to himself that he was gone.....
NutLoose is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 11:55
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Flying a twin-engine aircraft anywhere within effective .303 range of a bomber over hostile territory would seem to be less than smart, given bomber loss rates and the fact that everyone knew that there were ten Mosquitoes in the sky versus ****-knows how many Ju88s.
The raid on Nuremburg on 30 Mar 44, carried out by 795 aircraft from Bomber Command was met by 246 night-fighters. 94 Lancasters and Halifaxes failed to return.

Not sure about Luftwaffe night-fighter figures for the night of 19/20 Sep, but 1 & 5 Groups Bomber Command sent 227 Lancasters supported by 10 Mosquitoes to bomb Monchengladbach/Rheydt. 100 group sent a further 15 RCM aircraft and 17 Mosquito sorties. 4 Lancasters were lost in addition to Gibson's Mosquito - Gibson was Master Bomber for the raid. The low losses suggest that the night-fighters did not penetrate the bomber stream in large numbers.
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 12:01
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,048
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
The article also suggested the (Mossie) had all his nav lights on as well... suggesting he may have had radio problems and was trying to show he was friendly.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 12:40
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: london
Posts: 721
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
As I mentioned in my earlier post, a Lanc rear gunner told me Gibson went because 'he got too cocky'. He also told me that Gibson had said 'Its lovely down here chaps at four thousand feet'.

Now whether the X rear gunner was on that raid ( he died this year aged 90), whether it was hearsay, or whether Gibson was shot down by light flak I don't know. It would seem very unlikely that he would've been downed by a four engined heavy if he was at four thousand feet!

There have of course been references to a light in the cockpit, seen by people on the ground. This may have been a fire or possibly a torch, looking for the fuel valve, which previous stories have alluded to.

I guess we will never know.
rolling20 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 17:25
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lixwm,Flintshire
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There have of course been references to a light in the cockpit
Perhaps the light from the lighthouse shone for him.
ColinB is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 17:40
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
If Martin Middlebrook is to be believed (and he is an impecable source) then Gibson's aircraft "crashed in flames - according to a Dutch eye-witness...." (Bomber Command War Diaries). Doesn't sound much like a torch in the cockpit....
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 20:53
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denmark
Age: 68
Posts: 405
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, twasn't digger, I think. Nogger, maybe?
sablatnic is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2011, 21:21
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, twasn't digger, I think. Nogger, maybe?
Oh dear, we're getting close to sexism - might it have been 'nagger'?

I'm sure I binned one of them . . .
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2011, 00:01
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Recent findings have suggested that Guy Gibson, Amy Johnson, Glen Miller and Douglas Bader were all downed by friendly fire
And many others as well, I fear. I read somewhere many years ago that since records were kept (which I understand was the American Civil War, so let's say 1861), in every war since, the percentage of casualties caused by so-called 'friendly' fire has remained pretty much the same - a staggering 30%.

As shocking as that almost one in three figure may seem, is it so unbelievable when you consider that you're dealing with very scared, very stressed young men, (some of them not particularly well trained), with a gun in their hands, many of whom will shoot first and ask questions later. There are also the 'grand mistakes' by leaders where fire is directed to the wrong co-ordinates. For obvious reasons, great efforts are made to disguise such mistakes.

The example that always comes to mind for me when I think of 'blue on blue' incidents is the invasion of Sicily, where someone with absolutely no understanding of human nature routed the C-47 fleet carring the American paratrooprs over the invasion fleet. One excitable gunner on one of the many hundreds of ships in the invasion fleet started firing - and every other gunner on every other ship promptly followed suite. I can't recall how many aircraft were lost -(but it was many) - or how many of the airborne troops were killed or injured, but the casulaties were such that the airborne element of the invasion was more or less made totally ineffective.

When the Korean War started, the first mission the P-51s of 75 Sqn RAAF were tasked to carry out involved destroying a troop train under the direction of an American FAC. It was South Korean troop train. If my memory serves me correctly, the South Koreans suffered 450 casualties in that attack.
Wiley is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2011, 09:13
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: london
Posts: 721
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Wensleydale ..Doesn't sound much like a torch in the cockpit....
Perhaps you can enlighten us as to what kind of sound a torch makes?


Dambusters historian Jim Shortland believes that because Gibson was unfamiliar with Mosquitoes, he may have simply forgotten to flip the switch that turned on the second petrol tank

According to an article by Roy Nesbit (former RAF Coastal Command Nav-Beauforts) in Aeroplane Gibson was not shot down. According to Nesbitt, the aircraft may have suffered engine failure through fuel starvation. Gibson had apparently only flown the Mossie a handful of times before the fatal flight, and only once at night. He'd also never flown the aircraft to such a distant target, the importance of this being that he'd never had to use the fuel tank selectors behind the seat. Nesbitt's theory is that Gibson,unfamiliar with the selectors and groping around for them in the dark, selected an empty tank. Eye witness reports from the time state that a light was seen in the cockpit shortly before the crash and it's thought that they may have used a torch or switched on an interior light to try and see what position the selectors were in after the engines started spluttering. This in turn would've done their night vision no favours, which may also have contributed to the crash
rolling20 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2011, 11:17
  #37 (permalink)  
alC
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: bomber county
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rolling 20.

I was told the same story while visiting the Dambuster's museum at Scampton last month.
Apparently during the war, 617 sqdn. were known as The DumbB@stards and disliked by many of their fellow squadrons.
alC is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2011, 12:27
  #38 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gibson was Master Bomber for the raid.
Which involves hanging about over the target for the duration of the raid. Which in turn begs a question as to why he'd be fumbling about with fuel transfer so close to the end of the raid. On a more important point, the dog could not have been hiding in the woodpile. There was nobody in there but the chickens.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2011, 12:57
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Just outside Newbury
Age: 55
Posts: 289
Received 29 Likes on 5 Posts
Recent findings have suggested that Guy Gibson, Amy Johnson, Glen Miller and Douglas Bader were all downed by friendly fire
Bloke darn the pub told me they were all in the same aeroplane and that the pilot was some bloke called Atta.

Anyway, pse keep up the speculation as clearly the truth can only be brought out through internet theorising...
Maxibon is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2011, 13:12
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Perhaps you can enlighten us as to what kind of sound a torch makes?
Without wishing to be as pedantic - it sounds like a light whisper....

Martin Middlebrook also points out that Gibson's radio had worked perfectly throughout the sortie - as Master Bomber it would be a go-no go item - yet there is speculation about radio trouble. There are eyewhitness reports of the aircraft on fire.... methinks that, like Bader's loss, there is some deliberate misinformation out there to muddy the waters. Lots of theories - little evidence to draw an accurate conclusion.
Wensleydale is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.