Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Bravo November

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Sep 2011, 19:54
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Nope were still Odious at the time and for a period after the war.

Though it wouldn't be the first or last signal ever to go adrift


NutLoose is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2011, 20:32
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
And I can see the answer, SUGGEST YOU CONTACT RAF ODIHAM THEIR HOME AND ONLY OPERATING BASE.....

From the RAF web page on 18 Sqn:

During the Falklands War in 1982, four Chinooks were dispatched on the cargo ship Atlantic Conveyor, but three were lost when the vessel was sunk. The sole surviving aircraft gave sterling service on the islands in the months that followed. After the conflict, the Squadron returned to Germany, taking a small number of Pumas on strength before moving to Odiham in 1997.


Someone is wrong on this one.
ZH875 is online now  
Old 10th Sep 2011, 20:57
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In England
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Chinook pictured flying over Wideawake at Ascension Island is BP, which had been off-loaded.
BN was indeed the only one of the four remaining Chinooks on Atlantic Conveyor to survive the Excocet atttack. Incidentally, the aircraft that nearly got away from the aft deck (most were stored and flown off the central deck area) was BT. Although it is often written that only 3 whole Chinooks were lost on Conveyor, this severely underestimates the very large stock of spares, components and engines that also went down with Her. Indeed if you were at Odiham or Fleetlands at the time, you would find quite a few stripped airframes as a testament to this. The loss of the Conveyor therefore had a much more fundamental effect on the RAF Chinook force which lasted for many years after the end of that far away conflict.
Having reformed as the RAF's first Chinook sqn in Sept 1981 at Odiham, 18 Sqn did indeed remain based at Odiham until mid 1983 when it moved (at last) to its long intended home base of RAF Gutersloh, before relocatimg post Cold War to Laarbruch in 1993 once Gutersloh was handed over to the Army.
Tallsar is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 12:49
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Actually the RAF webpage is strictly true, they did return to Germany............. Eventually.


Yup tell me about it Tallsar, was a busy time,
Suprised the Conveyor never sank in Plymouth Sound with the stuff she was carrying that went off inventories when she sank

Along with the safe containing all the Cheques people had cashed on the way south
NutLoose is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 13:05
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Suprised the Conveyor never sank in Plymouth Sound with the stuff she was carrying that went off inventories when she sank
Indeed, although I joined up in 86, the amount of Signals kit that went down on it was still affecting the Army then. Whether it actually did or not, is a matter for the QMs and their less-than-sharp pencils.

Did the term "FOFAD" a few year later ever make it to the RAF?
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 20:21
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Anglia
Age: 74
Posts: 789
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
I have a print of Robert Taylor's painting "Corporate Action", which shows Sqn Ldr Dick Langworthy standing in front of "BN" somewhere in the Falklands, with Harriers in the overhead. Can't believe it's nearly 30 years ago!
1.3VStall is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.