Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

BAE Systems & MRA4

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

BAE Systems & MRA4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2011, 09:09
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,567
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Don't forget double full-stops. An IPT "Management Board" (17 staff, only 2 of them my senior and most non-technical) delayed approval for a high priority job for AFG for 6 weeks because I'd put a double full-stop at the end of a sentence in my technical spec. That's 17 staff, out of a 39-strong IPT, MoD could do without.

Moral of the story - have your work proof read by some-one else before you send it - that extra couple of hours can save you weeks. (The double full stop should have been picked up by a green wavy line in word. If not using word, then it is good practice to write in word first then cut and paste into other formats).

(Must check this before I send it tho')!
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2011, 12:45
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd go a bit deeper than that, Wensleydale...

How about too many people talking a good job, and not enough people getting things done?

After my little incident, I became a desk jonny. I was resonably well motivated & competent, but the work was piling on to me, they were whipping the willing horse.

Simple prioritisation degenerated into a system of work avoidance. What could I do to postpone one job so that I could concentrate on a more important one. Bung an e mail back asking for more info? Job done.

The IPT, almost without fail, issued STI's, RTI's & UTI's on a Friday. I suspect that the reason for this was that they spent all week having meetings, and had to make it someone else's problem by the weekend. .
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2011, 12:54
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
Thanks for that Wensleydale. I do hope your tongue was firmly in cheek.

The real moral of the story is MoD is chock full of over-promoted plonkers who have nothing better to do than fart about looking for such major howlers. The guy who spotted it prefaced his comments with "As I don't understand the technical spec...I suppose I better comment on something". In which case, why is he employed to scrutinise a technical spec? And why did I need to write a spec in the first place? Because the system doesn't allow DEC to specify a requirement; URDs are so woolly that, if contracted, the deliverable could meet the endorsed requirement but be incapable of being put to its intended use.

In the example I quoted, the main issue was military personnel were dying due to lack of a solution. It is simply not acceptable for MoD to employ anyone, at any grade, who adopts the stance taken. Something I hope everyone here would agree with.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2011, 15:35
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tuc,

Not just the MOD
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2011, 12:54
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wilts
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great Event!

Congratulations to the organisers and participants at the Dinner last night. Excellent speeches and a wide spread of guests (including crewmen and engineers!) made it a truly memorable event.

Chinook rules OK.
KG86 is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2011, 15:01
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KG86
Congratulations to the organisers and participants at the Dinner last night. Excellent speeches and a wide spread of guests (including crewmen and engineers!) made it a truly memorable event.

Chinook rules OK.
Er, wrong thread maybe?? Hangover??
TheWizard is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2011, 15:38
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Celebrating SFFP's departure?
cazatou is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2011, 15:48
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tullahoma TN
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that might have needed Shackleton fins to be resurrected.

Did the Shackleton die for our sins?
Modern Elmo is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2011, 19:26
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wilts
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I actually replied to the right thread but, like a number of posters have reported, the reply appeared in a totally different one.
KG86 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2011, 22:18
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: On The Road
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile I do like a bit of irony

Moral of the story - have your work proof read by some-one else before you send it - that extra couple of hours can save you weeks. (The double full stop should have been picked up by a green wavy line in word. If not using word, then it is good practice to write in word first then cut and paste into other formats).

(Must check this before I send it tho')!
Hello Wensleydale, having reviewed your post may I make the following suggestions; a, take the hyphen out of 'someone' and b, place the full stop of a sentence entirely enclosed within brackets within the brackets. (I know people take the Mick out of grammar police but I thought a bit of constructive comment in this case would be appropriate if not appreciated!)
baffy boy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.