Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Energy Companies buy RAF AD Radars

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Energy Companies buy RAF AD Radars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Aug 2011, 10:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,446
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
Energy Companies buy RAF AD Radars

I wonder if they'll have sponsorship logos on them....

Military radar deal paves way for more wind farms across Britain
ORAC is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2011, 10:49
  #2 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
British countryside RIP
green granite is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2011, 14:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree, S_M. There's certainly no other chance of the UK Mil getting its hands on some modern transportable radars anytime soon.

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2011, 17:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the Pakistanis got these in 2008

are we playing catch up again?

for interest this is Lockheed Martin's advertising flyer for it http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/8408.pdf
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2011, 18:03
  #5 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,446
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
Agree, S_M. There's certainly no other chance of the UK Mil getting its hands on some modern transportable radars anytime soon.
The RAF bought the T92 back in the late 1980s.

The T92 was the RAF designation for the GE-592, which begat the FPS-117, which begat the TPS-77.

It's low enough tech they sell it to Pakistan - and commercial energy generation companies.......

Modern, it's not........
ORAC is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2011, 22:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Aylesbury
Age: 58
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Modern - as in cutting edge technology - it might not be, but so far as the sensors being integrated into ACCS and compared to the current inventory, acquiring the TPS-77 and having the sheer chutzpah to get the racketeers of the energy industry to pay for it is not a bad bit of business.

It has rightly been observed that there would have only been one other way we would have got hold of such technology and that would have been the day that Satan took delivery of his first pair of ice skates.

Lets just hope that joe public doesnt catch on to the fact that both the "renewable" energy industry and the acquisition of these radars may have involved quite a number of er... players, shall we say telling slightly less than the whole truth.

Amazing what you can get away with these days.
Jabba_TG12 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 01:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the face of it, OK from an MOD funding perspective, but in terms of the whole government, the only reason these wind farms are 'cost effective' is because of Government subsidies. The logical extension of this is that the tax payer is paying for these radars just as much as they would have been if MOD had bought them (though possibly without the cost of DE&S Procurement!).

Oh and whilst it's fine from an ASACS perspective, I can't imagine they're terribly possible from the Low Flying vantage point. Do these wind farms affect AI radars?

STH

Last edited by SirToppamHat; 29th Aug 2011 at 10:01.
SirToppamHat is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 07:09
  #8 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The tragedy is that wind farms are so inefficient you will need to cover virtually the whole of the UK with them before we generate a sensible level of power.

Research, carried out by Stuart Young Consulting, analysed electricity generated from UK wind farms between November 2008 to December 2010, and found that wind generation was below 20% of capacity more than half the time and below 10% of capacity over one third of the time. Certainly not worth the ruination of the environment and the heavy subsidy they need to exist at all.
green granite is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 07:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey Hills
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stupidest thing is that wind farms need switchable fossil fuel backup power for when the wind is too strong or too weak. Plus we the taxpayers are covering the substantial lead in payments to the owners who supply the National Grid with very small amounts of power and surprise, surprise, when we need the power most [winter cold or summer heat it is usually when a high is sitting over the UK and wind is almost non existent!

The madness that is Green Garbage Grants!

We are Carbon based life forms and CO2 is neither a poison or pollutant. Nor does it cause Climate Disruption/Change/Global Warming which is a myth anyway.
aviate1138 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 10:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near the watter...
Age: 77
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I have never been able to understand is why, when the wind DOES blow, a lot of these wind turbine things still have their blades feathered and are generating no power. One would think that they would all be churning out their rated output in these conditions, and the fossil fuel stuff would be turned down. I'll bet it takes so long to get conventional power stations online that they turn off the wind farms instead! The sooner we give up on these illogical "renewable" energy systems and build some more proven nuclear generating stations, the safer we shall be from all the lights going out....
Molemot is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 16:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey Hills
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We should her heavily investing in Thorium Nuclear Power generation


Safe nuclear does exist, and China is leading the way with thorium - Telegraph

Last edited by aviate1138; 29th Aug 2011 at 16:55. Reason: added words
aviate1138 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 17:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Jabba_TG12:
Lets just hope that joe public doesnt catch on to the fact that both the "renewable" energy industry and the acquisition of these radars may have involved quite a number of er... players, shall we say telling slightly less than the whole truth.

Amazing what you can get away with these days.
Very perceptive. But if you can deploy the "national security" card to prevent people finding out the facts, you can continue to hold all the cards. And of course, contrary to all those now predicting that a couple of TPS-77s will allow the concreting of the countryside, this deal will allow MoD to insist that no wind farm anywhere within coverage of a radar which isn't a TPS-77 will ever be acceptable. Seemples! No more wind farms!

NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 17:41
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no great surprise that China leads the way in that technology. Thorium is a by-product of rare-earth metal extraction (mainly used in electronics) from monazite sands - and China has something like 97% of the world rare earth production, even though it has less than 50% of mineral resources (from mainly non-Monazite ores).
You may be aware that China plays games with the rare earth market: they hold back stocks and limit availability as a deliberate industrial warfare strategy, placing competitors at a major disadvantage.
The problem is that anyone extracting thorium would also need to extract and sell the rare earths to make production economically viable - but with China being able to dictate the terms of that market, no-one is going to take the risk.
Rare earth (and thorium) production is an environmental nightmare with massive quantities of highly acidic sludge being produced, that cannot easily be safely disposed of. Anyone remember the "red tide" that killed part of the Danube last year? That was a tiny fraction of the effluent from a rare earth extraction plant.
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 17:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"this deal will allow MoD to insist that no wind farm anywhere within coverage of a radar which isn't a TPS-77 will ever be acceptable."
But it may also explain why a small number of long established radar sites seem to have vanished over the last year......unless it was the local pikeys
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 17:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jd, thankfully India and The USA are thought to have the lion share of the world's thorium.

Well, according to wikipedia anyway...

Thorium - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It'll be nice to have a resource war where islam isn't a factor.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2011, 18:56
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this has possibly more accurate resource data on thorium
Thorium in Australia which suggests Australia, USA, Turkey, India, Venezuela
as the prime countries. However the problem is going to be the interlinking of the two markets: extracting thorium without extracting the rare earths doesn't make commercial sense - at present. And the Chinese totally control the rare earths market.
Given the environmental issues, Australia and the USA may simply be too expensive due to the effluent volumes
jamesdevice is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.