US Defence Chief sounds death knell for NATO
Thread Starter
US Defence Chief sounds death knell for NATO
I've wondered how long it would take for the US to openly air their concerns, as clearly too many NATO countries doing too little.
http://http://www.defensenews.com/st...77&c=EUR&s=TOP
http://http://www.defensenews.com/st...77&c=EUR&s=TOP
Gates Laments NATO's Military, Political Flaws
BY JULIAN HALE
Published: 10 Jun 2011 07:28
BRUSSELS - In his last official policy speech at the end of an 11-day tour, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates lambasted NATO for its shortcomings in terms of military capabilities and political will in Afghanistan.
In a speech at a high-level Security and Defence Agenda think-tank event in Brussels, Gates cited helicopters, transport aircraft, surveillance and reconnaissance, and intelligence as areas where NATO has struggled. Gates added that "similar shortcomings in capability and political will had the potential to jeopardize the NATO air and sea campaign in Libya."
Although NATO has achieved its initial objectives of grounding Libya's air force and reducing Moammar Gadhafi's ability to attack civilian populations, Gates said fewer than one-third of NATO allies had taken part in airstrike missions. "In the Libya operation, many allies are running short of munitions, requiring the U.S. to make up the deficit," he added.
Gates also said the emergence of a "two-tier alliance" of peacekeepers and those doing the hard combat missions is unacceptable.
Describing himself as the last senior leader to be a product of the Cold War, Gates issued a stark warning to European leaders: "The emotional and historical attachment U.S. leaders had with allies is ageing out. Decisions and choices [in the future] will be made more on what is in the best interests of the U.S. The drift of the last 20 years can't continue if we want a strong trans-Atlantic relationship."
Gates also noted that only five of the 28 NATO allies currently exceeded the agreed NATO benchmark of spending 2 percent of GDP on defense. "Regrettably, the situation is highly unlikely to change. The question is how these dwindling resources are allocated," he said.
NATO should do more to pool and share resources, he added. "We should be alert to areas for trans-Atlantic cooperation, but there is a rich agenda for pooling in Europe that should get attention first," he said.
Both NATO and the European Defence Agency are currently working on potential areas for pooling and sharing. Gates cited NATO's Strategic Airlift Initiative and its Allied Ground Surveillance System as good examples of cooperation.
He said the U.S. has no problem with Europe's efforts to build up its own equipment defense market and that a robust industrial capability between the U.S. and its allies is very important.
Gates also said the U.S. government was looking at dramatic cuts in a wide range of programs. "Defense will have to bear some of that burden," he said.
Introducing Gates to the audience, former NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer called for solidarity from NATO countries. He lamented the "uncoordinated budget cuts we're witnessing in NATO and the EU" and the lack of balance in burden-sharing between the U.S. and European allies.
BY JULIAN HALE
Published: 10 Jun 2011 07:28
BRUSSELS - In his last official policy speech at the end of an 11-day tour, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates lambasted NATO for its shortcomings in terms of military capabilities and political will in Afghanistan.
In a speech at a high-level Security and Defence Agenda think-tank event in Brussels, Gates cited helicopters, transport aircraft, surveillance and reconnaissance, and intelligence as areas where NATO has struggled. Gates added that "similar shortcomings in capability and political will had the potential to jeopardize the NATO air and sea campaign in Libya."
Although NATO has achieved its initial objectives of grounding Libya's air force and reducing Moammar Gadhafi's ability to attack civilian populations, Gates said fewer than one-third of NATO allies had taken part in airstrike missions. "In the Libya operation, many allies are running short of munitions, requiring the U.S. to make up the deficit," he added.
Gates also said the emergence of a "two-tier alliance" of peacekeepers and those doing the hard combat missions is unacceptable.
Describing himself as the last senior leader to be a product of the Cold War, Gates issued a stark warning to European leaders: "The emotional and historical attachment U.S. leaders had with allies is ageing out. Decisions and choices [in the future] will be made more on what is in the best interests of the U.S. The drift of the last 20 years can't continue if we want a strong trans-Atlantic relationship."
Gates also noted that only five of the 28 NATO allies currently exceeded the agreed NATO benchmark of spending 2 percent of GDP on defense. "Regrettably, the situation is highly unlikely to change. The question is how these dwindling resources are allocated," he said.
NATO should do more to pool and share resources, he added. "We should be alert to areas for trans-Atlantic cooperation, but there is a rich agenda for pooling in Europe that should get attention first," he said.
Both NATO and the European Defence Agency are currently working on potential areas for pooling and sharing. Gates cited NATO's Strategic Airlift Initiative and its Allied Ground Surveillance System as good examples of cooperation.
He said the U.S. has no problem with Europe's efforts to build up its own equipment defense market and that a robust industrial capability between the U.S. and its allies is very important.
Gates also said the U.S. government was looking at dramatic cuts in a wide range of programs. "Defense will have to bear some of that burden," he said.
Introducing Gates to the audience, former NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer called for solidarity from NATO countries. He lamented the "uncoordinated budget cuts we're witnessing in NATO and the EU" and the lack of balance in burden-sharing between the U.S. and European allies.
Hi;
Sec Def Gates covers no new ground. I recall the heated disagreements in the mid 80's over "why Europe wasn't spending enough and leaving the US with that largish burden ... " at a time when the Cold War was in full flower.
This is a running sore that is part of NATO state of play, any date.
This isn't new either.
SSDD
Sec Def Gates covers no new ground. I recall the heated disagreements in the mid 80's over "why Europe wasn't spending enough and leaving the US with that largish burden ... " at a time when the Cold War was in full flower.
This is a running sore that is part of NATO state of play, any date.
Introducing Gates to the audience, former NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer called for solidarity from NATO countries. He lamented the "uncoordinated budget cuts we're witnessing in NATO and the EU" and the lack of balance in burden-sharing between the U.S. and European allies.
SSDD
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In England
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lw50...maybe so in the general context...but in the strategic context of now rather than then, it is very significant. While many NATO nations can be seen to have been backward in coming forward when the going gets tough since it was created..it matters more now than ever it did..and the UK will pick up some of the flak too given what we are doing.
More to the point too, the US is increasingly recognising that its own reducing ability to fund enough firepower means it must better focus it's efforts on the Far East and the North (as the ice melts). If the Europeans want to defend themselves and create stability focussed on helping our future economic stability...then we must do more rather than less...but most seem deaf to that message.
More to the point too, the US is increasingly recognising that its own reducing ability to fund enough firepower means it must better focus it's efforts on the Far East and the North (as the ice melts). If the Europeans want to defend themselves and create stability focussed on helping our future economic stability...then we must do more rather than less...but most seem deaf to that message.
The truth is out in the open now....perhaps the United States will start withdrawing troops from Europe and stay away from entanglements in that part of the World.
We would be better put to move our over seas troop basing closer to the Middle East/Red Sea/Persian (Arabian) Gulf and in Southeast Asia.
If we assume a long-term strategy of securing our oil/gas supplies from the America's thus eliminating our need for Middle Eastern oil....we would be much better off long term.
Let the Chinese have the Middle East oil...Europe can have Russian oil...and the World would be a happier place.
We would be better put to move our over seas troop basing closer to the Middle East/Red Sea/Persian (Arabian) Gulf and in Southeast Asia.
If we assume a long-term strategy of securing our oil/gas supplies from the America's thus eliminating our need for Middle Eastern oil....we would be much better off long term.
Let the Chinese have the Middle East oil...Europe can have Russian oil...and the World would be a happier place.
Alternatively, if we invested in cold fusion and/or hydrogen cells the same amount of money that BP have shelled (sorry) out on clearing up the Deepwater Horizon mess, then we might never need to worry about petrochemicals again.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cazatou - your point is what exactly?
This US announcement does not sound the death knell for NATO at all. It sounds like a whinge from someone on the way out.
Without doubt the defence cuts being made across Europe including the UK are alarming. But the US cannot afford what they do - go look at their deficit!
So pooling effort through NATO must strengthen the case for it's existence rather than diminish it.
Like all supra-national organisations, it ain't perfect but its the only thing that ties Europe and CONUS together.
This US announcement does not sound the death knell for NATO at all. It sounds like a whinge from someone on the way out.
Without doubt the defence cuts being made across Europe including the UK are alarming. But the US cannot afford what they do - go look at their deficit!
So pooling effort through NATO must strengthen the case for it's existence rather than diminish it.
Like all supra-national organisations, it ain't perfect but its the only thing that ties Europe and CONUS together.
