Dambusters: Building the Bouncing Bomb
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Swindon, Wilts,UK
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The High ball was indeed spherical been done here http://www.pprune.org/aviation-histo...sted-land.html
Anyone got a link to the movie mentioned in the last post.
Anyone got a link to the movie mentioned in the last post.
spherical much better in theory because it has no "edge" to lead into water, and thus no chance of deviation from straight line. The levelling of wings is critical for an accurate run of a dustbin shape.
PPatRoN
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you, BEagle
This is the only place where you will hear in one thread the word "soliflucation" and discussion of Ms York's uniform-shirt-and-stockings scene in BoB. -- LO
Not just in combination, either. Believe it or not, it's also the only discussion thread where I've encountered the word solifluction.
adr
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK
Age: 67
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by aviate1138
The reason why the A26 was included is a mystery [other than an editor that doesn't have any interest in aeroplanes].
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Perhaps not as he might have chickened out.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The pilot was simply dangerous and placed the whole trial at risk. Interesting programme that highlighted why properly conducted trials have the safety hurdles in them that they do. Cockpit gradient too........I reckon the guy with 37,000 hours could have flown them both into the lake and the co-pilot would have kept quiet.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charlie
"Interesting programme that highlighted why properly conducted trials have the safety hurdles in them that they do."
Interesting point, though you should note that the original trials had none of these safety hurdles either, but the programme was a spectacular success.
Misguided though he may have been, the canadian pilot had very good handling skills.
"Interesting programme that highlighted why properly conducted trials have the safety hurdles in them that they do."
Interesting point, though you should note that the original trials had none of these safety hurdles either, but the programme was a spectacular success.
Misguided though he may have been, the canadian pilot had very good handling skills.
Charlie Time, totally agree ...... a terrifying old boy, and a meek lad, cringe-making.
Give me Ms York
NOW!
Give me Ms York
NOW!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is so many "educated" people don't understand that the media (TV, newspapers, whatever) show you want they want you to see. How do you think a program about large trucks and even larger truckers driving up and down a very boring, very cold road gets on prime time TV?
Answer, clever editing and dramatic music.
Same deal for the bouncing bomb program...interesting though it was, it is the job of the editor to spice it up for the larger audience, most of whom haven't a scoopies about the safety regimes for trials flying.
Give the guy a break...he probably spent days going over the safety procedures and parameters...wouldn't have made for great TV to show all of that though would it.
PS At the risk of treading on my own point...
Re the release point and the hard impact. Yep spotted that.. I wonder if the boffin briefed effectively. His comms skills did not appear to be all that.
Answer, clever editing and dramatic music.
Same deal for the bouncing bomb program...interesting though it was, it is the job of the editor to spice it up for the larger audience, most of whom haven't a scoopies about the safety regimes for trials flying.
Give the guy a break...he probably spent days going over the safety procedures and parameters...wouldn't have made for great TV to show all of that though would it.
PS At the risk of treading on my own point...
Re the release point and the hard impact. Yep spotted that.. I wonder if the boffin briefed effectively. His comms skills did not appear to be all that.
Give me Ms York
NOW!
NOW!
I should think most FO's would be a bit meek with the knowledge that the guy on their left hand had notched up the equivalent of over 4 years in the air! Yes he cut the odd corner, but he's certainly disproved the old adage about there being no old and bold pilots.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting point, though you should note that the original trials had none of these safety hurdles either, but the programme was a spectacular success.
I am not sure that is the point. Especially when you consider the video shown of aircraft crashing during the (admittedly post-war) testing.
Even if they did do safety assessments (which clearly wouldn't be shown on TV since they are generally tedious) I doubt the crew had sufficient specialist training to allow them do it correctly (evident from their actions during the testing).
Decisions like spinning up the bomb to full speed for the very next drop after a stores release hang-up (which could have ended in disaster) showed that the team were time pressure driven, on what was hardly a UOR!
However good the pilot was at flying, by deviating from the release parameters he exposed himself and his crew to unknown risk and also meant that the required data was not gathered!
If I were Dr Hunt, I would have been mightily annoyed that he ruined the only permitted opportunity to achieve the desired test point by making an uneducated decision.
That said, it was a good programme.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kettering
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fascinating viewing but that pilot's judgment was appalling. If it had been a real bomb he and his crew would be dead (on the real raid one store hit a dam in similar circumstances and went off immediately, taking out the Lanc that had released it); as it was, the splash on the live drop alone must have come pretty close to taking his tail off.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it had been a real bomb he and his crew would be dead
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
While wikipedia etc state that a bomb contains a destructive substance and is designed to explode, the 'store' dropped from the DC4 was by modern usage a BOMB.
A 1000lb Inert Bomb, with no explosive, is still a bomb. Low altitude releases can result in bounce and the splash can down an aircraft, both shown in this programme.
Regardless of whether it was a replica explosive bomb or this scaled replica store it was still capable of downing the DC4.
Had the release mechanism of the rotating store failed is some manner it could have been catastrophic.
A 1000lb Inert Bomb, with no explosive, is still a bomb. Low altitude releases can result in bounce and the splash can down an aircraft, both shown in this programme.
Regardless of whether it was a replica explosive bomb or this scaled replica store it was still capable of downing the DC4.
Had the release mechanism of the rotating store failed is some manner it could have been catastrophic.
Fascinating viewing but that pilot's judgment was appalling. If it had been a real bomb he and his crew would be dead (on the real raid one store hit a dam in similar circumstances and went off immediately, taking out the Lanc that had released it); as it was, the splash on the live drop alone must have come pretty close to taking his tail off.