Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

PR11 - latest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Apr 2011, 22:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: A quiet corner of blighty
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PR11 - latest

What's the latest on PR11 - any rumours abound?

Is the latest back door funding for the MOD enough to secure (albeit delayed) the buy of new CH for the RAF?

As SAR-H is now potentially back on the cards is the SK LEP now on the back burner and thus is this money now going back to keep Puma 2 alive? Again good news for RAF SH.

Does that then mean that CHF and the RN will get ME to play with and convert to the Mk4 in order to provide amphibiosity? Good news for FAA.

Does this all mean we won't need to chop yet more trainee pilots from the system? That would be good news.

Discuss.
Torque limited is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 01:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 463
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I posted this on the Puma Mk 2 thread last week:

from today's Guardian MoD and Treasury agree deal to plug £1bn funding gap | UK news | guardian.co.uk:


Quote:
However, the Treasury has agreed to pay for upgrades to Puma helicopters used by troops in Afghanistan out of the special reserve, a move that would save £250m from the core defence budget.
Doesn't say how many frames though.

Also on the Chinny front:


Quote:
The Treasury has not provided any new money for the defence budget, senior officials said. Instead, plans to buy new Chinook helicopters will be delayed and will not now be delivered until British combat troops have left Afghanistan.
chinook240 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 07:14
  #3 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
For which read:

"The MOD has put off buying new chinooks until we have left Afg, in the hope there might be some more money in the budget by then"

which there won't be... wave good by to those chinooks...

[/Cynic]
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 07:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: High in the Afghan Mountains
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh how delightfully refreshing - someone who thinks that it's all going to work out fine in the end! God bless you sir!!

Sadly, reality is that PR11 and the £1B shortfall aren't the same thing (one is a multi-year 'plan', one is a gaping hole now). Even the 'solving' of the shortfall isn't going to be good news - just not so much bad news. We'll have to wait until Parliament returns from their long Easter holiday (and you thought that teachers had it easy on the holiday front!!!) to find out what bits they plan to cut as part of PR11 - but I guarantee you that we're about to lose a lot of posts and not gain much kit. Extra aircraft - lovely idea; are you a Mail/Sun reader by any chance?

Keep smiling though!
Rector16 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 12:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: at home
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I predicted this mess last year on the 'future of FAA' thread. The future rotary strategy was based on the RAF getting 22, not 12 chinook prior to giving Merlin to the RN. That strategy (if it ever was a realistic one) is now in tatters. Conveniently, the 'disgusted of yeovil' letters to the telegraph forget this fact, and as a result the RAF are getting accused of all sorts of underhand behaviour. This sort of paranoia was entirely predictable, and the situation can only be resolved by more money - or rotary redundancies.
high spirits is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2011, 22:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Borderline England
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 things need to be cleared up here and the journalists could help by stating fact rather than what they think the public will show outrage over.

Puma 2 is not serving in Afghanistan.

There is sufficient RW uplift in theatre now.

Both the above guardian quotes seem to suggest otherwise.

And I totally agree with you, hs.
Unchecked is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.