Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Future F35C Bases (Pros/Cons)

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Future F35C Bases (Pros/Cons)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th March 2011 | 23:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Norn Iron
Future F35C Bases (Pros/Cons)

L&G,

Curious to the hear the learned folks views, where should we put her/him? (being Pc). I believe a lot of the original requirements may have changed (ie now a carrier variant aircraft (not a stovl)).

One for discussion...

IT
Irish Tempest is offline  
Reply
Old 15th March 2011 | 23:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
From: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
A short one at that.
glad rag is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 08:04
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 3
From: Pathfinder Country
Heathrow or Gatwick?
aw ditor is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 09:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
they'll never come

we'll buy 24 F-18's instead
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 09:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Over the rainbow
F35 Bases



My station of choice whould be Akrotiri!
philrigger is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 10:40
  #6 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: The Whyte House
Yeovilton.

No point in the RAF getting them, and there won't be enough to go around anyway.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 11:02
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 94
From: Welwyn Garden City
Quite true Willard, with 40 airframes seeming to be the overall number we can expect. If it is going to be 25 of those in service, then I imagine it will be, 2 x sqns 800 and 801 with 8 acft each and 8 or 9 for the HQ Trng Sqn, at Yeovilton. Unless, Lossiemouth is to revert to being HMS Fulmar again. As for the long term prospects of the R.A.F. That's anyone's guess.

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 11:55
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 48
From: Kammbronn
Unless, Lossiemouth is to revert to being HMS Fulmar again.
Much more likely to have a name ending in "Barracks."

Along with the former RAF Leuchars.
diginagain is online now  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 13:06
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 94
From: Welwyn Garden City
I most sincerely hope not diginagain, the thought of the Army descending on Leuchars, in particular, would not be a good idea!

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 13:16
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 48
From: Kammbronn
Despite my Army background, I appreciate that such a move will not be universally popular. However, plans are afoot to return 7 & 20 Armoured Brigades to the UK from Hohne and Paderborn respectively, and they've got to go somewhere. If you're not going to be able to fill parts of the estate, the Army can.
diginagain is online now  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 13:22
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 94
From: Welwyn Garden City
Perhaps Kinloss and Lossiemouth together, but would that alone be sufficient to acommodate just one Armoured Brigade?

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 13:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
Each Brigade has around 60-100 tanks

easily park them all onto a taxi track at Lossie

there isn't the money for them to exercise anyway
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 13:44
  #13 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 3
From: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Is it certain that 7 & 20 Bdes will be Armd on return? They may well end up as 7 & 20 Lt Bdes. Ergo no armour hangarage or access to SPTA required.

As for the carrier aircraft, somewhere near the carrier's home port. Since the Navy won't be able to justify Portsmouth AND Plymouth, they'll be down to Pompey and Faslane by then. So somewhere close to Pompey. Yeovilton or Odiham depending on who gets them.

Alternatively, no carriers means no carrier aircraft means no basing question.
Roadster280 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 15:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 2
From: Why oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?
You guys just aren't thinking laterally are you?

Re-open Debden or Hemswell, resurface and extend the runways, new officers' and SNCOs messes, new gynasium, new build MQ and, of course, refurbish and extend all the technical and admin buildings.

Easy.
sisemen is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 16:46
  #15 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 94
From: Welwyn Garden City
Ahh, Yes!! But you see Siseman, old Plum, we're trying to second guess the decision process of the Fox and his chums back at the M.O.D. Den!!

In which case, all Tiffy and Tonka Sqns remaining, may well be squeezed into Marham and the entire Army squeezed into Scotland at Lossie and Leuchars!

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 16:49
  #16 (permalink)  
MG
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 588
Likes: 17
From: Hampshire
Hemswell? I like that; good, expansion period airfield, an Officers' Mess well away from the the technical site and, thus, away from the oiks, and on a hill so a nice view for the days when there are no ac to fly! And Lincoln's not too far for a bit of Lager-scending and the Harry Potter chip shop!
MG is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 20:44
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 326
From: Royal Berkshire
Originally Posted by Roadster280
Since the Navy won't be able to justify Portsmouth AND Plymouth, they'll be down to Pompey and Faslane by then. So somewhere close to Pompey.
Thorney Island fits the bill......

Just need to chuck the Army out of it - mind you the locals might get the hump with some nice noisy jets being based there
GeeRam is offline  
Reply
Old 16th March 2011 | 21:23
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 74
From: One Three Seven, Disco Heaven.
Each Brigade has around 60-100 tanks
easily park them all onto a taxi track at Lossie
Nowhere for them to play with up North though, Otterburn being the nearest range of any size.
Dan Gerous is online now  
Reply
Old 17th March 2011 | 09:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
Has anyone noticed that UK & German moorland looks nothing like the desert where we have deployed tanks over the last 20 years???

Tho from a strange angle you can convince yourself that Alnwick looks like Cairo
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 17th March 2011 | 09:35
  #20 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 708
Likes: 117
From: the far south
At least the Air Force is ahead of the game with the sand at Donna Nook and Pembrey!

Shame they are quiet as a mouse these days. No wonder there are rumours about their futures.
typerated is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.