Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Bucc Tanking a Tristar

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Bucc Tanking a Tristar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 09:50
  #41 (permalink)  
Chief Bottle Washer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: PPRuNe
Posts: 5,171
Received 188 Likes on 116 Posts
On the subject of multiple refuelling: I wonder what the HMMWV's get from the transfer

Senior Pilot is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 11:34
  #42 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the feedback, supplied photos suitably saved.
BISH is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 11:35
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumour was this was used by the medical branch:

Proof, if it were required that the military actually DID employ both FJ and truckie pilots who were suffering from Alzheimers . . .
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 13:47
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 187
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can remember transferring fifty tonnes to a tristar from a VC10, we could definitely feel its bow wave, and watching the number two engine intake "sunset" as the fuel transferred was impressive, all done at 280kts. Happy days!
haltonapp is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 16:16
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's funny P, because I was given a bollocking one afternoon are coming back from said ARA.

We refuelled a VC10 which was a nice shade of green on my screen.

One of our Flight Commanders, newly promoted and a trifle keen said ' what kind of VC10 was it, to which I answered 'ours'.

He said we didn't have the authority to refuel the (first) VC10 Mk1K, as it was not cleared in the RtoS. To which I replied, I presume the VC10 skipper knew that. The nice Mr Ted H got a bollocking too, but rather difficult to blame us I thought.

I mean, it was silent procedures and this aircraft approached from underneath, never coming up alongside. We gave it about 75k and popped off back to BZZ - it was Friday, so a good move.

As you say, happy days.

Was the Bucc a wet contact? If so it probably managed to pass enough juice to run the APU for half an hour ;o)
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 16:24
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was the Bucc a wet contact? If so it probably managed to pass enough juice to run the APU for half an hour ;o)
Nah, besides which, we might have sucked the whole Bucc into our probe!
TheChitterneFlyer is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 16:35
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,823
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
The RtoS thing could sometimes be used to one's advantage....

Way back, we were having rather a dull day in the old RA7 in a nice 'pre-owned' VC10K3 watching with interest whilst some golden-gloved Boscombe TP did various test points of a K3-to-K3 AAR trial. Then up popped a Boscombe Bucc.

"Could you give him some fuel?" enquired the Boscombe TP....

"Well now. This, as you know, is a K3. Whilst the K2 is indeed cleared for the Bucc, regrettably the paperwork clearing the K3 is still languishing in a certain trials organisation's out-tray. So, awfully sorry, but we'll have to say no!"

Shortly afterwards, as if by magic, the VC10K3 RtoS was amended to include the Bucc!

Mind you, back during my brief time on the F-4, we had our annual joust against the KC-135. But on the day in question, a KC-10 was sent instead - it was quite a new beast in those days. So we all prodded the thing and found it remarkably easy - much easier than the awful KC-135 BDA and easier than the Victor. During lunch, the Boss popped into the crewroom looking rather amused. "Chaps, someone important has just found out that the F-4 RtoS doesn't include receiving from the KC-10. He said no-one else is to prod it, but was rather cross when I told him that we'd all had a go and the first blokes are just off to have another go!"

"Are you - or we - in the dwang, Boss?"

"No, fortunately. I've been told I have to go and give Boscombe an account of our unofficial prodding trial though. But OC Ops has been given a right bollocking for not knowing that the RtoS didn't include the KC-10! Poor old Forbes, what a pisser!"
BEagle is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 17:10
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
''But perhaps there were specific tanks for the receiver's fuel - as (I think) in the KC-135Q used to refuel the SR-71A?''

You are correct. Completely separate tanks for the JP7 the SR71 used. The KC135Q's J57s wouldn't run on it.




I once participated in a very unofficial and very un-cleared prod against a Bucc from a Victor. We were in the friday afternoon ''lets get rid of it ASAP to get to happy hour'' bootleg mode when a Bucc agreed to take 2K. He then offered it back. A quick look rearwards courtesy of the wing mirrors showed he was trailing a hose. We just had to do it - but it wasn't easy!
Dan Winterland is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.