Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Dropping to 6 Fast-Jet Units

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Dropping to 6 Fast-Jet Units

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jan 2011, 17:00
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
270v DC generation and servo actuators are currently the sole preserve of US industry...
Well at least they have learnt one lesson from their ridiculous 110 volt system.

Perhaps they could now design some decent plugs!
Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2011, 20:48
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 503
Received 40 Likes on 10 Posts
I also believe that all the IFF kit in our "sovereign" fast jets (Tornado/Typhoon) are from Raytheon Systems in Virginia; how's that for ITAR-free!

Plus the RADAR in Sentinel and Sentry are subject to ITAR.

Both IFF and RADAR are individually singled out in the US Munitions List (USML) for ITAR.

I would therefore concur that the "Operational Sovereignty" argument is dead and buried. If COTS saves another school, hospital or public services then "Operational Sovereignty" is very difficult to justify in today's financial climate.

iRaven
iRaven is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2011, 08:17
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ITAR raises it's ugly little head wherever the manufacturer is owned by US registered company, irrespective of location or indeed history; when Smiths were bought up by GE there were difficulties over the supply of British manufactured/designed components urgently needed for an operational airframe until the requests could be presented to the appropriate Senate committee.
Sovereignty went out with the introduction of 'The Market Place' (and perhaps some outrageously unfair protectionist policies from our 'special' friends across the water)
Harley Quinn is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2011, 09:25
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Yes, the cousins hide behind ITAR for even the most basic of technologies. It's becoming a bit of a farce going to somewhere like ARSAG only to find the Spams won't discuss anything because of 'ITAR' restrictions. So you find European manufacturers freely discussing their products, but smiling suits from Boeing, Jeppesen and the like hiding behind their 'ITAR' shield...
BEagle is online now  
Old 4th Jan 2011, 09:28
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B Word,

Yes I know all about ITAR thank you very much
F3sRBest is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2011, 11:59
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Battersea
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bin the Tranche 1's???

He cant be serious can he? There not even all in service yet! The tax payer may be defence blind'ish, but their not going to fall for that one surely? Isnt that a Tranche 1 in the vid? 4 Paveway, 4 AMRAAM plus external fuel and able to handle being thrown around the sky to boot - whats wrong with that?? Retain the T1s for AD of the UK/FI and QRA, and use the Tranche 2/3's for exped stuff I say - thats if johnny foreigner doesn't gobble them all.....
Pongoglo is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2011, 16:50
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
surley you can hang anything from an aircraft for a dispaly getting it to safely seperate is a tad more tricky and land where you want it to is the bit that causes the huge bills
NURSE is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2011, 13:37
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
surley you can hang anything from an aircraft for a dispaly getting it to safely seperate is a tad more tricky and land where you want it to is the bit that causes the huge bills
Absolutely! the RC&J clearance is 'relatively' easy and independent of the Tranche, the tricky and expensive bits are the avioncis and software that make the darn thing any use!
F3sRBest is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2011, 07:03
  #89 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Hmnn... the USMC is looking for 22 Sqns of F35s. That kind of puts our likely 6+ into perspective.
Navaleye is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.