Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Harrier Last Flight (Merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Harrier Last Flight (Merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Dec 2010, 13:23
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of Trim,

if not scrapped the assets will remain on the MoD's balance sheet and they will still get charged for them by the Treasury..... you couldn't make this stuff up!
F3sRBest is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 13:40
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Out of Trim:

To keep them in any sort of readiness state would take almost as many technicians and support as it takes to keep them flying.

And if we pulled them out at short notice who the hell would fly them? Blackadder and the 20 minuters comes to mind, in fact I'd bet on it being nearer 5!
dctyke is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 14:31
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys I'm going to miss you over Wigtown Bay. Sad to think I'll never hear the Pegasus roar again. Thanks from the little kid who'se first memory of a warplane is a GR3 at Wittering - and who'se latest is seeing that last RN Harrier land on ARKR.

It was a pleasure to meet a few of you the other week in Ark. Sad to think certain pubs of Stamford (and wardrooms) will no longer hear your stories.

I am a civvy so have no business posting here.

Dan.
tyne is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 14:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Coalition Government

Forgive them
For they know not
What they do?
Epsilon minus is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 15:55
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forgive them nothing.

Oh I think they know very well what they are doing.

At some point the country will wake up and give the government of the day a clear mandate to re-arm the forces. This will of course involve building more aircraft which will be tarted up with the promise of British jobs but no matter what they buy, there will be a way for the UK defence industry to be part of it.

Engines or avionics or assembly, you can bet that at some point our current and recently ex lords and masters will have a finger in the till of whatever company gets that deal.

Why keep aircraft that have been paid for when you can make the MOD buy new stuff from your next employer?
airpolice is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 16:08
  #26 (permalink)  

Nemesis of the Proot Dynasty
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somewhere in Hampshire
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I vividly remember being one of a party of 92nd Entry Halton Apprentices on a visit to Duxford in 1959 (just possibly, 1960). We were treated to a flight of one of the prototypes. When I say ‘flight’, I exaggerate! In fact its maximum altitude possible, was about 6 feet, since it was tethered to the pan by four ruddy great chains! Still, very impressive all the same.
Lukeafb1 is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 17:00
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: York
Posts: 517
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
To keep them in any sort of readiness state would take almost as many technicians and support as it takes to keep them flying.
That can't be right. The USAF doesn't have several thousands techies at Davis-Monthan, keeping all of the hundreds of aircraft at readiness. Some are closer than others, but almost all are recoverable.
muppetofthenorth is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 18:42
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 532
Received 178 Likes on 94 Posts
Err, no. They're not. Whilst a proportion are in storage to balance airframe hours, the vast majority are in parts reclaim status or there to be scrapped.

As others have posted, even those that are regenerated from Davis-Monthan take months and that's where there are aircrew and maintainers trained, certified and ready to use them. Re-creating the corporate knowledge, once stood down takes years.

Out of Trim - plan B was deferred as a savings measure.........
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 06:30
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
I may be wrong but the last time the RAF tried balancing ac hours was with Lightnings at Binbrook when I was on Lightning Augmentation Flight (LAF). About 50 of us looked after around 20 ac in various states of storage that were rotated thought 5, 11 and LTF. Most of the airframes never flew again although many man hours was spent on their upkeep. Storing a jet ac is not the same as putting your classic car up on jacks in the garage I'm afraid.
dctyke is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 07:19
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middlesex, UK
Posts: 100
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I vividly remember being one of a party of 92nd Entry Halton Apprentices on a visit to Duxford in 1959 (just possibly, 1960). We were treated to a flight of one of the prototypes.
I presume you must mean Dunsfold. The first tethered hover was on 21-Oct-1960.

Rhys.
Rhys S. Negative is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 09:45
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some images of the Harrier camouflage scheme from yesterday.


DSC_0224HARRIERZG506COTTESM by llihmot, on Flickr


0045HARRIERGR9COTTESMORE13D by llihmot, on Flickr


DSC_0161HARRIERZG50613DEC10 by llihmot, on Flickr


DSC_0153HARRIERSUNSETCR by llihmot, on Flickr

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 11:10
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FLYPAST

Harrier fly past rehearsal today.

Not sure of complete timings but overflying Wyton between 1445 and 1455
(confirmed).

Last edited by philrigger; 14th Dec 2010 at 11:31. Reason: Confirmation of timings
philrigger is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 13:56
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saw them overfly Lincoln just now. Diamond formation plus one shepherding aircraft. Superb.
kiwibrit is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 13:59
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lincs
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harrier Fly Past

16 ship Harrier fly past of RAF stations today. I'd like to say it is was good value for money, however the value is sentimental (hardly justifiable) and not helped by the flypast happening 4 minutes early, whereby most people missed it.
White Noise is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 14:02
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you'll find it was a rehearsal for tomorrow.
forget is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 14:18
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: here, there, everywhere
Age: 47
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope it was a rehersal, they just went over head here at woodhall spa, v impressive, but would be better lower!
CathayBrat is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 14:19
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rehearsal - as noted elsewhere in the forum. Superb flypast over Lincoln.
kiwibrit is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 18:14
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: hi in the ski
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
iRaven

I'm afraid quoting post SDSR MOD 'lines to take' doesn't quite cut it with me or the rest of those in favour of the 'capability' argument winner.

We'll have to agree to disagree on this one....
barotraumatized is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 20:42
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I hope the CO's fund picked up the tab for some tinnies for the painters.

Great Job.

I wish them well for the future.







[this REALLY sux, doesn't it]
glad rag is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2010, 21:25
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since they did so well today, why waste cash makin' 'em fly tomorrow?
Willard Whyte is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.