Defence Review - Headlines
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey Hills
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If this coalition has scrapped our defences and left funding for almost useless renewables in place then I might have to stamp my feet quite vigorously and wave a placard or two!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The termination of the Defence Training Rationalisation (DTR) project and the Metrix Consortium's appointment as preferred bidder has been announced by Defence Secretary Dr Liam Fox today, 19 October 2010."
So it's not all bad news then?!
Spent my last tour in the Service as a poc between an outstation of the DCAE and this monster; it became clearer to me as time progressed that it was going to be too expensive in the emerging climate of public spending runaway and would not be able to deliver the military contextualisation needed. Now that I'm a Civil Servant (insert filthy/hard working/loyal/muddled as appropriate) I'm rather relieved just to know what the future holds until "the Spring." DTR would have given us a shiny new home, but how many such projects actually end up looking like the architect's drawing?
So it's not all bad news then?!
Spent my last tour in the Service as a poc between an outstation of the DCAE and this monster; it became clearer to me as time progressed that it was going to be too expensive in the emerging climate of public spending runaway and would not be able to deliver the military contextualisation needed. Now that I'm a Civil Servant (insert filthy/hard working/loyal/muddled as appropriate) I'm rather relieved just to know what the future holds until "the Spring." DTR would have given us a shiny new home, but how many such projects actually end up looking like the architect's drawing?
One think that has not been mentioned is why are the things we need to buy so bloody expensive? If we could get them for a reasonable price, the cuts would be a lot less painful.
Why do we need to pay £20 for a washer to go on an aircraft? Does it have to come hermetically sealed in it's own box?
Do we really need everything to have a Mil Spec when an equivalent item works just as well as one designed for civil use but costs half the price?
Do we need to put things through an extensive Boscombe Down trial because 'thats what we've always done'?
Can we not specify what we want from the onset rather than changing our minds every few months and avoid scope creep?
We all have examples where we've said 'How Much?!' Lets address the things like the above and perhaps we'll find a new aircraft no longer costs £80M each and we might be able to afford the Armed Forces that we really need.
Why do we need to pay £20 for a washer to go on an aircraft? Does it have to come hermetically sealed in it's own box?
Do we really need everything to have a Mil Spec when an equivalent item works just as well as one designed for civil use but costs half the price?
Do we need to put things through an extensive Boscombe Down trial because 'thats what we've always done'?
Can we not specify what we want from the onset rather than changing our minds every few months and avoid scope creep?
We all have examples where we've said 'How Much?!' Lets address the things like the above and perhaps we'll find a new aircraft no longer costs £80M each and we might be able to afford the Armed Forces that we really need.
If you seriously think...
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to this:
BBC News - The UK's defence dilemma
we still have one of the bigger defence budgets in the world, are still spending in the region of 2.5% of our GDP, yet appear to have significantly less in terms of manpower AND equipment than comparable or even smaller nations?
and we're just cutting rather than sorting the actual problems out?!
BBC News - The UK's defence dilemma
we still have one of the bigger defence budgets in the world, are still spending in the region of 2.5% of our GDP, yet appear to have significantly less in terms of manpower AND equipment than comparable or even smaller nations?
and we're just cutting rather than sorting the actual problems out?!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No but people properley qualified to supervise procurement who know and understand the legalities and who can coach services into writing specifications that are air tight, comprehensive and logical could save both time and money.
and its not made up Qualifications my partner is a member having passed the exams and has worked in procurement in both Industry and Local Government on top of a degree in buissness studies
Home Page - The Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply
and its not made up Qualifications my partner is a member having passed the exams and has worked in procurement in both Industry and Local Government on top of a degree in buissness studies
Home Page - The Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Banished (twice) to the pointless forest
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this the same body of Professionals who entered into a contract for Aircraft Carriers where it would now cost more to pull out and get nothing than it would to actually buy the boats?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would say like most government departments most procurement officers are not CIPS qualified as there is no requirement to have the CIPS qualifications in Civil service just to pass the Civil service entry exam.
No but people properley qualified to supervise procurement who know and understand the legalities and who can coach services into writing specifications that are air tight, comprehensive and logical could save both time and money.
Ask any of the old TTO grades what gave them most pride in their position. The fact they had to pass trade tests every year to maintain their grade and pay. Introduce that requirement into DE&S and watch most squirm.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
STV: Strategic Defence Review statement: Live streaming
Watch live coverage from the House of Commons of the cuts to be made by Britain's armed forces.
Watch live coverage from the House of Commons of the cuts to be made by Britain's armed forces.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
money was still being spent on the Armed Forces by the previous Government
Dannatt said a couple of years ago that we had tanks and MLRS that we didn't need. Swiss Des was said to be furious when he found out about the Lynx in Germany that were stuff all use anywhere else.
Yes the MOD has been profligate with spending plans.
Creating Defence Training Estate as a centralised organisation that would save money didn't it just created a larger HQ and reduced the previous organisations not an inch.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
In his statement the PM said that the carriers and the F-35C would be introduced at the same time, a late change of mind at the ridicule being experienced?
When talking about AT he mentioned the C-17 and A-400M, but the C-130J was conspicuous by it's absence.
When talking about AT he mentioned the C-17 and A-400M, but the C-130J was conspicuous by it's absence.