Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF safe (.. probably).

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF safe (.. probably).

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th September 2010 | 00:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,304
Likes: 1
From: @exRAF_Al
RAF safe (.. probably).

Dr Julian Lewis (New Forest East) (Con): Given the highly specialised tasks involved in defending our airspace for the indefinite future, does the Secretary of State agree that it would not, in any way, compromise the integrity of the strategic defence and security review if he were to state today, in the week in which we celebrate the 70th anniversary of the climax of the battle of Britain, that he will give no time to the strategically illiterate suggestion that the Royal Air Force should be abolished and absorbed into the other two services?

Dr Fox: In general it would be wrong of me to pre-empt the SDSR, but I can give my hon. Friend an absolute assurance that the Royal Air Force will continue.
Hansard - Commons | Houses of Parliament
Monday 13 September 2010
Al R is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2010 | 02:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: The Fletcher Memorial Home
Yes, but in what form?
Ogre is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2010 | 03:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: troon
Yes, but in what form?

... The Royal Air force of the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force of the British Army
althenick is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2010 | 06:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
From: East Midlands
Typical political weasel words IMO!
A2QFI is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2010 | 06:49
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 746
Likes: 5
From: Northumberland
The RAF will shrink to it's smallest size in history but it will remain. It is not about capability or anything even remotely Military. It is about Politics. This shower have enough on their plate without being the first Government to abolish it's Air Force.
The public will not give two hoots if we lose 4 or 5 RAF Stations, several Squadrons etc because they are far more concerned about their local Hospital, their kids school and collecting what the State 'owes' them. Cut the whole RAF however, and that is a different kettle of fish. As well as the domestic impact it will send all the wrong messages Internationally as well. No Politician is going to risk that now, or for the forseeable future.
Wyler is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2010 | 09:00
  #6 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,695
Likes: 7,377
From: Peripatetic
The RAF will shrink to it's smallest size in history
.....The immediate post-war years saw a scaling down of the RAF, from 188 operational squadrons and 291,000 officers and men in 1918 to 12 squadrons and 31,500 officers and men in 1920.....

I think the Air Staff should read up on how Trenchard handled the situation.

.....The fight for survival as an independent air arm was a real one and was waged largely in government committee rooms, in Parliament and in the press. Fortunately for the future of British air power and the RAF, the time brought forth the man - or more precisely, 2 men: Winston Churchill, as Minister for War and Air, and Trenchard, as Chief of the Air Staff.....
ORAC is online now  
Reply
Old 14th September 2010 | 13:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 14
From: Somewhere Sunny
The Way Ahead

ORAC - a particularly timely peice and should be read by all of those engaged in the curretn debate - including our Lords and Masters.
Whenurhappy is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2010 | 17:53
  #8 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
40 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 97
From: U.S.A.
Isn't that just another classic example of a self-licking lollipop?

"Hey Julian, the proles are getting a bit uppity about chopping the RAF about during the SDSR, do be a good chap and ask me the following question in the House for the record"

"Asolutely old bean, should calm the more excitable one's down for a while."
Two's in is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.