Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

British troops investigated for heroin smuggling??

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

British troops investigated for heroin smuggling??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2010, 18:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
British troops investigated for heroin smuggling??

No Way!,

I really hope this is not true:

BBC News - British troops investigated for heroin smuggling

I know a few incidents of cartons of tabs coming back from Dhahran, but this would not be good, .
SRENNAPS is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 20:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Don't worry, the redcaps are on to it
NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 21:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,071
Received 187 Likes on 71 Posts
I can't see someone with access to opium (OMLT etc working with ANA/ANP) thinking they could get away with it and getting together with someone working at the airhead. It just seems unlikely.

That said, I really hope it isn't true.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2010, 21:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 62
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aren't your lot are cutting back your defence force? Probably looking to fund their retirement.
Captain Sand Dune is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 10:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The MoD spokeswoman, uses the term 'troops', the BBC translated this to 'soldiers'!

To me 'troops' is a collective term that can include personel from the RAF & RN.
ian16th is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 10:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
To me 'troops' is a collective term that can include personel from the RAF & RN.

Certainly not in my book, Ian, any more than "soldiers" includes Marines!

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 10:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jack,

Whilst agreeing about soldiers and Marines, I never had a problem being one of the troops.

Mind you, I was never refered to as a Troopie or Squadie! They were terms definitly reserved for the Army.
ian16th is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 14:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Swamp Land in East Anglia
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What ever happened to the movers involved with the 'ciggies' scam? Court case was at the beginning of year which was adjourned I believe.
Lord Trenchards Brat is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 19:38
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Small beer in the general scheme of things, but the media will exploit it.

I propose a two year plan for dealing with the heroin problem:

Year 1, alternative (subsidised) cash crops for the Afghan farmers, amnesty for the traffickers/dealers and understanding treatment for the junkies.

Year 2 would involve napalm, shooting and cold turkey.
Mike7777777 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 21:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Year 2 would involve napalm, shooting and cold turkey
Let me know when you're gonna do that - it'll rack the price right up, making it an ideal investment for anyone suitably tooled up.
NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2010, 00:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,792
Received 78 Likes on 35 Posts
The MoD spokeswoman, uses the term 'troops', the BBC translated this to 'soldiers'!
Seems like a fair payback for all those times that RAF and RN personnel engaged on high-profile duties wearing CS95 get labelled as "Army"...
Easy Street is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2010, 06:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike

If only others could think of things like that!

alternative (subsidised) cash crops for the Afghan farmers (Already happening - any Governer Led Eradication (poor wording but not mine) only takes place in areas where alterntaive livelihood programmes are in operation), amnesty for the traffickers/dealers (Why? these people are crooks - exploiting the population and funding most the the corruption in Afghanistan that feeds the insurgents' 'cause')and understanding treatment for the junkies. (Already happening in Afghanistan)
Wholesale crop destruction generally only hurts the farmers that are already being exploited - thus driving them away from the Afghan government and international allies. It would also drive the street price of opiates up (as it did when teh Taliban order that production ceased) and thus make more money for the Drug Traffickers who, it is assessed, alrady have enough stockpiles for 3 years of world demand.
Climebear is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2010, 18:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The thought of the criminal world "tooling up" to defeat the US military and security services is laughable. If those who grow the stuff don't get the message then we'll have a second round of napalming/general burning of things until the message gets through. Hearts and minds is irrelevant, it doesn't work.

Stockpiles? Find them and burn them.

There will be no "street price" after year 1.

But won't happen, too many bleeding heart liberals on both sides of the Atlantic.

Edit: Am I ranting? That is a possibility ..

Last edited by Mike7777777; 14th Sep 2010 at 18:30.
Mike7777777 is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2010, 20:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,071
Received 187 Likes on 71 Posts
The thought of the criminal world "tooling up" to defeat the US military and security services is laughable.
The Colombian and Mexican cartels are far better equipped than the Viet Cong ever were, yadda yadda yadda..............

Hearts and minds is irrelevant, it doesn't work.
Have a read of Rupert Smith's 'The Utility Of Force', particularly the chapter on Malaya. It does work if military, diplomacy and civil administration all pull in the same direction.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 02:04
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in the mess
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, apparently there's no investigation at all, and no accusations have been made.

Total load of media bolleaux.

As you were.
nice castle is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 08:43
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
If we gave the people that wanted heroin, heroin wouldn't the money going to terrorists kind of er - stop?

Or is there some aspect to the demand / supply chain that is applicable to all other products in the world accept scag?
Load Toad is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 11:20
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Swamp Land in East Anglia
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice castle

SIB getting 24hr notice to move to that area before the press release (I know I shouldn’t admit I have an SIB friend), suggests very much an investigation was/is being carried out. Whether there is any evidence is another thing
Lord Trenchards Brat is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 11:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
If we gave the people that wanted heroin, heroin wouldn't the money going to terrorists kind of er - stop?
A bit simplistic, don't you think?

If we gave alcohol to all the drunks who wanted it wouldn't we just have a lot of piss-heads lying in their own puke in the street, demanding another drink?
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 12:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,824
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Ever visited Glasgow, Mr B?


BEagle is online now  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 12:47
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Nope.
I didn't say make it easier to become an addict. I said 'Take away the profit from drug dealers and at the same time you'll also take away the impact of 'petty' and often violent crime by addicts who will do anything to get a fix of low quality junk.'

Because we have pubs, off-licenses, parties and clubs it's really impossible to get to work isn't it? What with the drunks lying in the street, the fights, the gun battles to win supply rights of illegal liquor, the blind an ill from taking bad booze....


Just give addicts heroin and lets move on. Bit sad to me that our soldiers are dying because we can't treat addiction as a health and education issue not a law / order / terrorism / war issue.





And are you suggesting that if heroin was legal you'd be rushing off to grab a syringe first chance you got to go and get completely monged off your tits and spend all day in an opium haze, no use to anyone?
If you wouldn't why would you think the rest of us would?

Last edited by Load Toad; 15th Sep 2010 at 13:05.
Load Toad is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.