Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Dec 2012, 10:21
  #361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
F-35 Cancelled, then what?

Then this. And we can scrap the new carriers too!


Last edited by Courtney Mil; 6th Dec 2012 at 10:32.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 10:35
  #362 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,409
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
I prefer the Brit version.


Last edited by ORAC; 6th Dec 2012 at 10:35.
ORAC is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 10:35
  #363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice link and in really rough weather it could have a vertical take-off capability
glojo is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 10:36
  #364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Thanks, Mate. Got there eventually.

Or with this we could scrap all the submarines as well!

Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 10:44
  #365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Listening to the narrative, I wonder if those premature lift-offs in heavy seas might cause premature ejeculation!!
glojo is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 10:49
  #366 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,409
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts


ORAC is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 11:16
  #367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As long as they change the uniforms ORAC.

Well, maybe not for everyone.


Last edited by Willard Whyte; 6th Dec 2012 at 11:17.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 15:44
  #368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Actually, there was a Skunk Works seaplane fighter study in the early 1980s, probably because of the difficulty of cratering a lake.

And you could probably use active ride control/smart actuators to alleviate the Sea Dart's most serious problem, which was that the high-speed on-water ride caused the pilot's body parts to vibrate into places where God did not intend them to be.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 04:22
  #369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whot... the "at-home" Brits too busy reminiscing about 1970s TV... shows... to pay attention to the doings in the colonies?

Apparently JSFfan is still asleep "downunda"...
http://www.pprune.org/7552617-post356.html
Internal politics saying stuff means nothing, all partners are still committed.
Federal government cancels F-35 fighter purchase

Federal government cancels F-35 fighter purchase

By Michael Den Tandt, The Ottawa Citizen December 6, 2012 10:06 PM

OTTAWA — The F-35 jet fighter purchase, the most persistent thorn in the federal government’s side and the subject of a devastating auditor-general’s report last spring, is dead.

Faced with the imminent release of an audit by accountants KPMG that will push the total projected life-cycle costs of the aircraft above $30 billion, the operations committee of the federal Cabinet decided to scrap the controversial sole-source program and go back to the drawing board, a source familiar with the decision said.

This occurred after Chief of the Defence Staff Thomas Lawson, while en route overseas, was called back urgently to appear before the committee, the source said.
More details at link.

Last edited by GreenKnight121; 7th Dec 2012 at 04:27.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 07:09
  #370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
keep reading, there was a gov release stating it isn't true, sorry to disappoint you, again it is internal politics and means nothing.
JSFfan is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 07:41
  #371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/5...-plug-f35.html

They are "considering alternatives" and the CoS was hauled back from overseas .... sounds like they're getting their coats on to me

Last edited by Heathrow Harry; 7th Dec 2012 at 07:43.
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 08:02
  #372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the heathen lands
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
JSF fan,

no, the government press release said that the article contained a 'number of innaccuracies'. it didn't say what those inaccuracies were - it could, for example have been refering to spelling mistakes, or specific stuff that doesn't really impact on the thrust of the story which is that JSF is in very deep poo in Canada, and that the government has, according which version you believe, either already decided to cancel JSF, or decided to have a new competition in which it may well cancel JSF.

if there were no truth whatsoever in the story, the government would have said so - it did not...
cokecan is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 08:47
  #373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm.

For the life of me I can't understand what Canada wanted it for in the first place.
glad rag is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 09:06
  #374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F-35 deal not cancelled, Tories insist. Update on the government's plan to purchase new fighter jets expected next week

The Harper government says it has not made a decision on the F-35 as a replacement for Canada's CF-18 fighter jets, but the government now appears to concede that alternative fighter purchase options will be considered.

The Prime Minister's Office denied a media report Thursday that the F-35 purchase was dead, calling the report "inaccurate on a number of fronts" and promising to update the House of Commons on its seven-point plan to replace the jets before the House rises for the Christmas break at the end of next week.

That plan is now expected to involve a real competition.
F-35 deal not cancelled, Tories insist - Canada - CBC News
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 10:33
  #375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 52
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That plan is now expected to involve a real competition.
Not that I'm doubting the average intelligence of those that decide on these massive purchases but wouldn't that have been the first thing to do before comitting to 1 specific product?
Or is that just me using an excessive amount of rational thought???


Anyway if they are going to have a 'competition' , the outcome can be pretty much whatever they want, the F35 for the RCAF might be as alive as before , with a slight political detour to safe face in the longrun.

Competitions can have all sort of dubious outcomes, last times it was the Gripen vs Rafale in Switzerland, the EF vs Rafale in India and also the strategic tanker debacle for the USAF are still fresh in the mind.
kbrockman is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 11:14
  #376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They aren't having a competition, they are having a review, big difference.
JSFfan is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 11:31
  #377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The Harper Government cannot be seen to be ignoring the financial side of the F-35 deal (now that it's out in the open), as they are using the same arguments on other big policies.
Whilst Canada remains officially committed to the program, Canadian companies retain their share of the manufacturing work, which is not guaranteed otherwise (read: more likely to be kept the longer it stays committed).
The end result could be anything from cancelling & buying Super Hornets to a whitewash review & F-35 continues, with any amount of delay.
Unless anyone here knows what's going on in Stephen Harper's head, I suggest we wait and see.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 11:56
  #378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The procurement cost numbers for Canada hasn't changed and both sides are using the same group of numbers. The different cost numbers count different things. Canada wants a 5th gen jet and they have said there is only one 5th gen jet available to them. The rest is a political side show

Canada News Centre - National Fighter Procurement Secretariat announces bid for review of acquisition process
National Fighter Procurement Secretariat announces bid for review of acquisition process

The goal of this independent review is to:
  • determine whether the shortcomings the Auditor General identified in the acquisition process have been addressed;
  • confirm whether the steps taken in the acquisition process for the period up to June 2012 were in accordance with government policies, procedures and regulations; and
  • provide lessons learned and propose recommendations for changes, if any, to current practices and policies for acquisitions of a similar nature
Frequently Asked Questions - National Fighter Procurement Secretariat (NFPS) - Military and Marine Procurement - Buying and Selling - PWGSC

Last edited by JSFfan; 7th Dec 2012 at 12:35.
JSFfan is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 12:48
  #379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
they have said there is only one 5th gen jet available to them
Yup, they said that, but the new COS isn't singing from quite the same hymn sheet.

F-35 not only jet that meets stealth needs, top general says - Politics - CBC News

"But when asked by Liberal defence critic John McKay whether there is only one airplane that can meet the standard of stealth set out in the Canadian military's requirements, Lawson said "no."
"All options are on the table," Lawson told MPs."


As I said, I think you'd have to be inside the Prime Minister's head to know what all the secret agendas are here.


.

Last edited by Fox3WheresMyBanana; 7th Dec 2012 at 12:49.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2012, 13:24
  #380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all options are on the table and the review will look at all options and will probably get the prices of the current 4th gen as a cost comparison, the option for a 5th gen jet is the f-35, do you know of another one available to Canada?
The Super hornet URF is $66m and the f-35a is $73m in 2012 dollars (LM thinks $67m) I don't know for certain the URF of the eurocanards, but I hear they are dearer

Last edited by JSFfan; 7th Dec 2012 at 13:27.
JSFfan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.