Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Israel asks for 20 F35's

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Israel asks for 20 F35's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Aug 2010, 01:39
  #21 (permalink)  
BarbiesBoyfriend
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gents
Sorry for thread drift.


Main point was meant to be: Israelis: If you want planes, F-35 or others, buy them your feckin selves.


Then you will be able to bomb the poor idiots whose land you stole back in 1948, interest free.

Thank God for Israel. Where would we be without you?
 
Old 26th Aug 2010, 02:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tunisia
Age: 71
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe without this current financial debacle?
poina is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2010, 03:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to quibble about who stole whose land, but the Jews were there 2000 years ago--they just took a vacation and all these squatters were there!

Anyway I'm just glad not all the foreign military sales for the F-35 are flaking out on us. The UK is looking pretty shaky, not to mention the USN, and the price increases are beginning to be reminiscent of the F-22.

I'm sure the Israelis will be able to give us real-world OPEVAL of both its air-to-air and air-to-ground capability--bonus!
ospreydriver is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2010, 11:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Decommisioned!

EDO/ITT supplied military components for the VER-2, the main bomb rack for Israel's F-16s.

When Israel was using F-16s to kill hundreds of civilians (including 350 children) in Gaza last year, activists broke into their Brighton factory, smashed up the production line and closed the factory.

After hearing evidence of Israeli war crimes the jury at their trial found all the activists not guilty of conspiracy to cause criminal damage because they had been acting to prevent a greater crime.

The ”decommissioners” as they are known said their actions were in response to the atrocities being committed in Gaza . “The international community appeared to be completely helpless. The UN could not even protect its own compounds. The only light at the end of the tunnel for the people of Palestine is if ordinary people like us take direct action on their behalf."

EDO Decommissioners Victorious Corporate Watch – Tracking Corporate Complicity in the Occupation of Palestine
Butch Lewis is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 10:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Got any evidence of the 'hundreds of civilians including 350 children' Butchie?

Any undisputable evidence? As opposed to questionable Hamas propaganda or the 'testimony' of a load of hand-wringing Brighton hippies?

I have a feeling I know where this thread is headed.........
Training Risky is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 10:41
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
jury at their trial found all the activists not guilty of conspiracy to cause criminal damage because they had been acting to prevent a greater crime.
That's an interesting concept for a jury to make a decision on.

I can't see that 'acting to prevent a greater crime' appears in the links you've provided.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 10:48
  #27 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,440
Received 1,601 Likes on 734 Posts
Anyway I'm just glad not all the foreign military sales for the F-35 are flaking out on us.
Israel having second thoughts on purchase of Joint Strike Fighter
ORAC is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 11:01
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Aylesbury
Age: 58
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just another case of the criminal justice system going down the sh*tter in the UK, if a bunch of no-job, no hope, aching-conscience, self loathing middle class spotty student tw@ts can argue their "direct" action is justified as part of the greater good.

Where did they get the jury from? Brick Lane?

I could/should have thought of that line of defence and gone and pressed a Browning Hi Power to a former Labour party leader's temple and see where that would have got me. "Honestly, your honour, I was doing the country a favour."
Jabba_TG12 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 11:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Rage and stereotyping go so well with injustice and hate don't they?
Load Toad is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 11:42
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Aylesbury
Age: 58
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe they do.

In all seriousness, I'd wager a pound to a pinch of s*** that those who were guilty of the break in and trashing the place have not even met any Palestinians, diaspora or not, let alone been within 500 miles of Gaza or the West Bank. Not good enough reason to go into a place you've got no business to be in and trash the joint.

And I think the comment about the justice system going down the pan was perfectly justified, if the case is indeed true. Any judicial system that would allow this kind of criminal damage to go unpunished whilst using RIPA against homeowners with wheelie-bin lids that dont close or prosecuting a pet shop owner for selling a goldfish to a teenager is an ass. And thats putting it very politely.
Jabba_TG12 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 12:15
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
jury at their trial found all the activists not guilty of conspiracy to cause criminal damage because they had been acting to prevent a greater crime.
That's an interesting concept for a jury to make a decision on.

I can't see that 'acting to prevent a greater crime' appears in the links you've provided.
Unfortunately it seems its "normal". The group that beat up the Hawk at Warton, and the Raytheon protesters in NI got away with their actions under the same jury decision
Tester_76 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 13:50
  #32 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
you should point out the terms and conditions were incredibly favorable to the UK.
- Of course they were, they stood back for long enough to ensure we were bankrupted into rationing for 9 years and lumbered paying back our war debt, conveniently allowing uncle Sam to step into the empires shoes and ensuring were were eternally ****ed as a nation, despite being on the winning side.

Other than that - it was great.

if ordinary people like us take direct action on their behalf."
- A bit like terrorism perhaps?
AR1 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 14:20
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Other than that - it was great.
We needed it - who else was offering?
Load Toad is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 14:33
  #34 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
We needed it - who else was offering?
Bloke with a 'tache...

No, a little earlier involvement would probably have helped.
AR1 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 16:02
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Just another case of the criminal justice system going down the sh*tter in the UK, if a bunch of no-job, no hope, aching-conscience, self loathing middle class spotty student tw@ts can argue their "direct" action is justified as part of the greater good.
Perhaps I'm being dense but F16s aren't made in the UK are they?
Tashengurt is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 16:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Low level
Age: 60
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, a little earlier involvement would probably have helped.
I thought wars of choice aren't in vogue now, much less in 1940 (never mind the several hundred USN sailors killed by U-boats/accidents in convoying those supplies well past the midway point in the Atlantic. Or those several thousand US Marines who garrisoned Iceland to free up those British troops who subsequently went to North Africa and Greece).

One could wonder if the Czechs thought the same thing in 1938 or the Poles during "The Phoney War" while the BEF and French Army sat behind their line with the vast majority of the Wehrmacht visiting Poland? But that would be poor form would it not?


No comments about Hamas' claiming "credit" for murdering those four Israelis at the start of this current round of peace talks? Lots of furor about Isreal responding to rocket attacks originating from Gaza, but nary a word about events like this.

A message there perhaps?

Last edited by boftr; 2nd Sep 2010 at 17:17.
boftr is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 17:23
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 416 Likes on 259 Posts
Bomb racks for the F-16, if I recall the story correctly. An accessory, if you like.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2010, 21:53
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Liechtenstein
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oi! You took out rebuttal reply but left this? I thought the poster had rather answered the charge.


No, a little earlier involvement would probably have helped.
off centre is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2010, 10:49
  #39 (permalink)  
BarbiesBoyfriend
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why does Israel want the JSF anyway?

The opposition are mainly armed with stones and have no air force.

When it comes to bombing civilians, which is mainly what the IDF/ AF does, surely the F-16 can do the job as well as the F-35?
 
Old 3rd Sep 2010, 11:59
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by BarbiesBoyfriend
Why does Israel want the JSF anyway?
Iran's nuclear facilities would be a wild stab in the dark guess..........
GeeRam is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.