Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tucano Paintscheme

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tucano Paintscheme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 04:11
  #21 (permalink)  
MG
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 593
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
It really looks good. Top(ish) marks, but......
Along with the camouflage appearing to be the wrong way round, the red centre of the roundel is way too small. It is obvious even before put alongside the Spitfire.
Shame the wx is getting warm again, you don't half sweat in these anoraks in these temperatures!
MG is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 06:06
  #22 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,502
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Ahh, but the red has to be small so that we don't mistake them for Zero's in the tropics...
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 08:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,826
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
'Wrong way' camouflage seems to be a modern thing. The Hunter and (a few) Lightnings had camouflage in the same direction as the Spitfire and Hurricane, but our Hawks at Chivenor () had camouflage in the same direction as those 'Spitanos'.....

Must get a new stepladder....
BEagle is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 08:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, I'll take the bait, how exactly does one apply camouflage 'the wrong way'? Answers with diagrams/pictures please. Yes, i agree that the red center of the roundal is too small.
Saint Jack is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 16:07
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Ok I'll rise to that one, spotter mode on........ look at the Spit and the Tucano, the spit is the opposite to the Tucano's scheme.......


OK Pass out the Humble Pie and I will eat it, it appears they have done the scheme to this Genuine Supermarine Drawing.... well, all bar the roundels.

NutLoose is online now  
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 16:26
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,826
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
OK, I'll take the bait, how exactly does one apply camouflage 'the wrong way'?
Left-handed painter with right-handed brush?

OK, OK, I'll..........
BEagle is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2010, 19:23
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really don't know who painted it but some stations P&F sections had people who knew what they were doing.. And some didn't.. This was before the trade was decimated 3 years ago, but civvy aircraft painters tend to be similar (with what I've seen). Painters and Dopers was never only refering to the fabric tensioner was it!!
Alber Ratman is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2010, 10:17
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very Spotterish

Top side camouflage was sprayed on using pre-cut rubberised mats so there were variations on a theme.

Scheme A (mats on as per Tucano)
Scheme B (flip the mats over, result as per Spitfire)
Scheme C (as per A but colours transposed)
Scheme D (as per B but colours transposed)

There was apparently a 'cunning plan' for aircraft with serials ending in an odd number to be in Scheme A, and those with even serials to be in Scheme B. This appears to have been a short lived 'cunning plan'..!! Scheme C & D were probably just the paint shop misreading the official drawings; the hatched area in the drawings was meant to represent the lighter colour but appears to have been sprayed in the darker colour.

The roundels are correct for Battle of Britain markings; the later style roundel with the thin yellow and white rings wasn't introduced till mid 1942.

I shall now retire to my darkened cave and wait for the medications to kick in whilst contemplate buying yet another monster lens with a lens cap the size of a dustbin lid..!!

Rgds
AndyBuckley is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2010, 13:20
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AndyBuckley wrote

The roundels are correct for Battle of Britain markings; the later style roundel with the thin yellow and white rings wasn't introduced till mid 1942.
The Spitfire pictured in formation with the Tucanos is wearing Battle of Britain markings.

Battle of Britain Memorial Flight - Spitfire P7350 (Mk IIa)

Battle of Britain Memorial Flight - 92 Squadron - Geoffrey Wellum

You can see the correct roundel ratios on the Global Aviation Resource article.

Global Aviation Resource

A very early roundel modification produced the following strange result, but it still differs considerably from the roundel on the camo Tucanos. It appears that something has gone wrong with the roundel ratios on the camo Tucanos.

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s...ppy35/Tuck.jpg

From following forum.

Robert Stanford Tuck Spitfire Mk V

You can see the roundel ratio on QJ-F at the following link

http://www.techmod.pl/techmod/images/48000/48001-02.jpg

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2010, 13:28
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have to agree that the scheme really does suit the Tucano.
Just a shame their engines don't sound anywhere near as good as a Merlin though.
hurn is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2010, 13:39
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some further examples of 66 and 92 Squadron Spitfires.

LZ-X of 66 Squadron

RAF - Battle of Britain No.66 Squadron

LZ-F of 66 Squadron

Clavework Graphics

QJ-S of 92 Squadron

http://www.clavework-graphics.co.uk/...1_GB_92Sqn.png

QJ-D of 92 Squadron

http://www.rafweb.org/Markings/92Sqn6.jpg

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.