Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Review of Continuance

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Review of Continuance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th May 2010, 18:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Review of Continuance

There was a Manning Announcement a couple of months ago, all a bit NuLabour non-commital business speak, something like:-

'In order to meet the exciting challenges ahead...blah blah blah...adjust the skills balance...blah blah...some personnel may be released under the terms of their contracts...a ministerial announcement is expected shortly'

(ie. 6 months notice)

This filtered down to us with the addition that individual cases may be argued at Station level.

Some of us, confident of being irreplaceable had the question:- 'Will the individual cases be argued at Station level after the six months notice letter, or will the notice letter be put on hold' (This was never answered)

It sounds like today, quite a few guys on the logistics side, got their letters. And some more, who had been accepted, got it cancelled. (And presumably they are no longer accepting applications)

Any more gossip out there?

I for one, have tentatively opened several brown envelopes to discover that my Polio is out of date, and my hearing test.
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 13th May 2010, 21:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard very recently; but pre contempary Govt, that the ranks of Air Commodore & Wg Cdr were being targeted for severe cutbacks that would subsequently effect future Grp Capt & Sqn Ldr promotions. I suspect that 'New Govt' will not change the perception of 'lean requirements' at these levels. The stats will tell all soon enough. The fiqure of 22 Air Commodore 'retirements' was mentioned though one person in the same audience had just heard of the establishment of a 'new' Air Commodore post, so perhaps there is a degree of smoke and mirrors involved in the reshuffle of stars.

Manning Announcements are out of date before they hit the streets these days.
Diablo Rouge is offline  
Old 13th May 2010, 23:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,336
Received 82 Likes on 34 Posts
"Group Captain G J Bruce MBE to be promoted Acting Air Commodore and to be Assistant Chief of Staff Media & Communications, Headquarters Air Command, on 1 April 2010. This is a new 1-star appointment."

This is from the Senior Appts announced on the 31 Mar 10!!!

I've heard of trimming down the side of the whole promotion pyramid. Hence less than 30 on this year's Sqn Ldr to Wg Cdr Board and less than 70 on the Flt Lt to Sqn Ldr Board - for the Flying Branch its normally 60ish and 120ish respectively! I also hear that we have too many of the wrong branch in the wrong jobs - I believe, if my rumour source is correct, if you're a "warfighter" then you should be safe.

By the way I believe that Air Cdres are easy to shift as they can be given a "blue letter" to go at any time and just get a pension. Wg Cdrs are a different matter as they get redundancy and pension - which for a 45yr old AFPS75 member is about £150k tax free and a pension of £24k per year (a lot of wonga). Plus that takes into account the new redundancy rules thrust upon us recently - it is interesting that the Civil Service just had their revised redundancy rules under "NuLabour" overturned in Court as "unlawful".

See here BBC News - Union wins civil service redundancy pay challenge

Interesting to see if we'll follow suit.

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 01:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: somewhere special
Age: 46
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was unaware of the "you're being let go" approach, but something of note for any future redundancy is the change of the redundancy rules - i commented here a while ago. The DIN dated in 2008 now requires commissioned types to have 16+ years for immediate pension plus retirement package (old AFPS 75 rules was 12 years reckonable).

assuming we're to lose 20-25% of people, that's a broad sweep across many ranks and branches (even if we do target some 1* and SO1 posts).

P45 anyone?
Herc-u-lease is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 02:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Bar to Bar
Posts: 796
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
Leon,
My understanding is up to OF5 you are promoted and then OF6 to OF9 (we no longer have OF10) are appointed. Ergo, no appointment to go to, no job, no redundancy.
Sloppy Link is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 05:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Another S**thole
Age: 51
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More brown enevelopes hitting the streets today - including a few aircrew posts!
Blighter Pilot is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 06:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no appointment to go to, no job, no redundancy.
I would imagine that is would only be valid on a disestablished post. ie Sacking to make way for another person = illegal. The lawyers will be having an open season.

That said if TOS does mean that Air Cdres are easily removed and Wg Cdrs not, could account for why I have heard that 9 of 22 proposed Air Cdres already have the news but no Wg Cdrs as yet.
Diablo Rouge is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 09:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,341
Received 62 Likes on 45 Posts
Humour me: what's continuance, in the service context? Ta.

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 11:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,792
Received 78 Likes on 35 Posts
The point about "enforced retirement" of Air Ranks is true and applies across all 3 services. I know of an Army colonel who recently turned down his promotion to brigadier, as he feared serving a short tour as a 1* and then being unceremoniously booted out. Obviously a career-stopping move, but financially sensible - it would be a brave man who gambled that he was worthy of retention at those levels! Staying on the CEA gravy train is probably a strong motivation for officers of that age as well.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 11:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldnt he have retired on nigh on Colonels pay anyway if he took his 1* job and then was made redundant?
VinRouge is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 13:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ice Station Kinloss
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CG

At our age matey, it means serving past age 55!!
KonfusedofKinloss is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 14:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If it's to do with age, does it have any connection with "incontinuance"?

Already got my coat on
Wander00 is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 14:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think its great. ....cause by the time I get to 55 the pendulum will have swung again and they will be desperate for experienced folk to stay. Cost em though
Diablo Rouge is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 15:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CG

The term continuance is generally given to short extensions of Service for (mainly for airmen) beyond normal conditions of service ie: a cpl beyond 22 years or a sgt or chf tech beyond 30 years.

The catch with them is that part of the terms and conditions of service for the continuance is that the Service can give 6-months notice (as can the recipient). It would appear from posts on e-goat that the RAF has decided to exercise this right fairly widely.
Climebear is offline  
Old 14th May 2010, 16:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I sincerely hope the RAF chooses to exercise this option with a couple of oxygen thieves I have the misfortune to share a working environment with. Useless ba****ds to a man.





*star
Grabbers is offline  
Old 18th May 2010, 11:32
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, there can be common sense decisions to come from HQ AIR. One waste of rations gone, one to go! Bye bye.
Grabbers is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.