Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

What is it like to fly a Jet Fighter?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

What is it like to fly a Jet Fighter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Apr 2010, 14:40
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toulouse area, France
Age: 93
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightning Mate

The going down shot would be great, too - Pity is that I don't have the Meteor shot, except in memory, but I believe it was in Flight in about the '50s. Perhaps one ought to trawl through their archives, unless it was a CB personal copyright - he too may have made four shots, showing the "complete, ideal loop" ...
Your Lightning shot reminded me of the sky over Lincolnshire one great day in the early '60s when I was refreshing at Manby as I did my best with a Meteor 8 and could see, away in the distance, others also "leaping like salmon up into the sky" and thoroughly enjoying themselves, like me. One of those "fun" trips that stay so clear in the memory that I can almost feel the straps against my shoulders ...

Oh Gor, the dust's got into me specs again ...
Jig Peter is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 14:47
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My pleasure:



Oh Gor, the dust's got into me specs again ...
...know the feeling.....
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 15:00
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toulouse area, France
Age: 93
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow - Eeee...

LM
That's great for getting the heartbeat going again ... should be standard equipment in any "get the oldies feeling young again" kit !
Thanks for both those...
Jig Peter is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 15:11
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
JP,

Check PM.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 15:36
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 54 Likes on 34 Posts
Looking at the pic of the Lightning, what was the goal of the engineers loading the engines on top of one another?

Was accessing the engines for MX easy with this configuration?

Obviously the thrust line is close enough, but was there any pitch asymmetry if one engine was out?
West Coast is online now  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 15:47
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Anglia
Age: 74
Posts: 789
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Accessing anything on the Lightning for MX was a nightmare!
1.3VStall is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 16:40
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brighton
Posts: 970
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
West Coast

Looking at the pic of the Lightning, what was the goal of the engineers loading the engines on top of one another?
They are not stacked vertically: the lower/forward one is below the wing, the aft/higher one behind the wing - this layout enabled the minimum possible frontal area, as the widest bits of each engine were staggered.

A contemporary of mine worked at Warton on the Lightning (and TSR2); on the former, access to most things was very difficult. A review by EE later suggested they could have made the fuselage 3 inches wider, with negligible performance loss and much better access. Hindsight is wonderful!
kenparry is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 16:44
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very little pitch asymmetry on one donk but the common intake was a safety weakness - multiple birdstrikes and FOD tended to get both engines at once and on one occasion the radome and waveguides were digested by both.

However, axial flow Avons seemed to cope admirably with this diet and I have no doubt vulcanic ash would have been equally acceptable!
soddim is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 16:46
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looking at the pic of the Lightning, what was the goal of the engineers loading the engines on top of one another?

Was accessing the engines for MX easy with this configuration?

Obviously the thrust line is close enough, but was there any pitch asymmetry if one engine was out?
I think we're now into thread drift re. the original question.

Bill Petter, not the engineers, reasoned that it would reduce frontal area and he didn't go with area ruling. The No.2 engine (upper) was staggered aft of the No.1 to achieve a satisfactory C of G envelope. Engine changes were not easy, but then again as others have said, nothing was easy on the Lightning (except flying it).

The aeroplane did not exhibit any noticeable assymetric pitch with one out. Astonishing is the fact that it could achieve a rate of climb of around 20,000 feet per minute in burner on one.

However, axial flow Avons seemed to cope admirably with this diet and I have no doubt vulcanic ash would have been equally acceptable!
Avons would cope with anything except fires.

Last edited by Lightning Mate; 26th Apr 2010 at 17:08.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 19:05
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Pole
Posts: 970
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Ah LM nice pic! Suppose the airbrakes are out to stop you going supersonic??

When I fired the 4 guns on the F2a the MRG button exploded into the cockpit! That certainly caused a few failures!
newt is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 19:08
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Pole
Posts: 970
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Ah LM nice pic! Suppose the airbrakes are out to stop you going supersonic??

When I fired the 4 guns on the F2a the MRG button exploded into the cockpit! Luckily it was VFR all the way back to Gutersloh!

Happy days
newt is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 19:11
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Happy days
Absolutely.

Perhaps it's now time for "smoke off - go" before the mods go all red and we are exposed......

Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 19:19
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its like nothing else on earth

Geehovah is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 19:21
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Its like nothing else on earth
You can certainly say that again......

Tried rolling it at low IAS ????
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 15:29
  #75 (permalink)  

Lead on...
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Dorset
Posts: 91
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Modern fighter

Can anyone with experience give me a insight into what its like to fly a Fighter Jet?
I don't suppose that I have any words to add to describe flying a FJ, but here's another type, much later than the Lightning, Hunter or Vampire already discussed.

It was wonderful to fly, although the gun's vibration was only serious if you were in the back seat of a 2-sticker.

And clearly it was a winner with the ladies ...

Picasa Web Albums - cmacdb
McDuff is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 15:46
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was a challenge LM - the low speed fight in the F4 was really challenging and needed lots of co-ordination of stick, rudder and throttles but extremely satisfying if it ended with a shot against a lower wing loader.

Are we giving you a taste of it yet, FlareAngel?
soddim is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 16:32
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toulouse area, France
Age: 93
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel Lightning Mate

PM(s) 4 U
Regards,
JP

Jig Peter is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 17:07
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW PORTUGAL
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6 Sqn

I agree with much stated. 1500hrs F4 for me.

Going off at a tangent, does anyone have any photos of 6Sqn Phantoms? I omitted to take many in my time there.
blaireau is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 17:19
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll see what I can copy for you blaireau. Most of mine are faded - just like the memories!!

But do you remember Al V and the nurse with varicose veins?

Now that's a test for any fighter pilot.
soddim is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 18:30
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Farnham, Surrey
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even more thread drift, but wasn't Al V a Nav . . . . . ? Still a decent test, though! See posts #9 and #14.
johnfairr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.