Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Do we need an Independant Nuclear Deterrant?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Do we need an Independant Nuclear Deterrant?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Nov 2010, 09:48
  #201 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Did he mean weapons or power plants?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 14:29
  #202 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 1,231
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there any truth in the rumour that the UK Trident cannot be fired without US authorisation?
Mikehotel152 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 14:49
  #203 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
If the UK was facing a total defeat by an attacker using conventional forces or was in imminent risk or was attacked by a nuclear weapon....do you really thnk the UK Leadership would stand down if the US did not grant approval to their request/notice?

What does scare me is the thought there are amongst us folks who really want to and are willing to....turn that key and hit the launch buttons on things that will end life on this Earth.

Also....knowing how close we have come in the past on numerous occasions for the lack of or the inadequate communication between nations.....the thought the Button Pushers might actually get called into action by misfortune really does scare me.

Last edited by SASless; 13th Oct 2012 at 14:49.
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 14:56
  #204 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: london
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No.

You are allowed to wonder whether the Pres. would not try to interfere if a rogue UK PM wished to take nuclear umbrage with a friend of US. But the A to your Q is that no such evidence has appeared, and the Agreements by which Polaris A3K, then Trident II D5 were provided, assign them to NATO/Saceur except "“in grave National Emergency”.
tornadoken is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 16:04
  #205 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
My point is a Nation's Leadership in times of absolute grave circumstances shall do what is in the best interest of the itself.....not what is written in a treaty. Survival of the Nation is paramount no matter how many reams of paper bind it to others.
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 16:32
  #206 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North of Watford, South of Watford Gap
Age: 68
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Peter Hennessey writes in "The Secret State" that each Trident submarine carries in a safe within its safe "The Prime Minister's 'last resort letter', written in his own hand, conveying his posthumous instructions to the captain and his executive officer." This arrangement allows for the case where the normal command arrangements are disrupted by a pre-emptive strike on the UK, and represents a case where US approval could not be obtained.
Innominate is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 16:41
  #207 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
Are we talking a "Crimson Tide" situation here?
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 16:57
  #208 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
In Peter Hennesey's programme The Finger on the Button James Callaghan said he would indeed give the launch command. Dennis Healey, OTOH, a former card carrying member of the Communist Party, said he would not.

As far as I know, based on Hennesey's work, the chain of command was PM-AOC-in-C Bomber Command and, one presumes later Strike Command and the CinC Fleet. The Secretary of State for Defence was not in the loop as far as the deterrent was concerned.

For full use however it would have been the decision of the NAC/DPC.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 18:11
  #209 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Last Letters are shredded as soon as new PM comes in so we don't know what's in them but it's thought they fall into 3 categories

1. Fire the lot off ASAP

2. Contact the Yanks and put yourself under their command

3. Sail to Australia or New Zealand and make them a Great Power

the trick is to fit the PM to the Category....... Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher. Major, Blair...................

Personally I'd give them authority to sell to the highest bidder...........

Last edited by Heathrow Harry; 13th Oct 2012 at 18:15.
Heathrow Harry is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.