Generals told to travel 2nd class
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Generals told to travel 2nd class
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: .
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ridiculous
I travelled first class from Bristol to Central London for £14.50 last week.
In any case, I didn't know you could get Standard (working) Class on an Augusta 109.
Less use of the train, more trade for boys from Northolt then!
In any case, I didn't know you could get Standard (working) Class on an Augusta 109.
Less use of the train, more trade for boys from Northolt then!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You may have gathered that I'm not a fan of our military senior management, BUT this is patently ridiculous.
Travelling time for senior staff is almost invariably working time - if the money grabbing, self centred political slimeballs can have it, then leave this (one of the last) privilege alone, it's short sighted, naive and downright rude.
I am SO finding all flavours of politicians to be worthy of less regard than pond life, words almost fail me.
This day and age is hopefully the nadir of regard for people of politics. I sincerely hope that they can't sink any further.
It's such a shame that the ballot paper won't have a box for 'None of the Above'.
Travelling time for senior staff is almost invariably working time - if the money grabbing, self centred political slimeballs can have it, then leave this (one of the last) privilege alone, it's short sighted, naive and downright rude.
I am SO finding all flavours of politicians to be worthy of less regard than pond life, words almost fail me.
This day and age is hopefully the nadir of regard for people of politics. I sincerely hope that they can't sink any further.
It's such a shame that the ballot paper won't have a box for 'None of the Above'.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seem to remember that in the early days of New Labour that there was a plan to introduce the "None of the above" option to the ballot paper. I see that it has been quietly dropped. I wonder why??
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All armed forces personnel must now sit in standard class on trains and planes, whatever their rank.
(a bear of little brain)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 51 10 03.70N 2 58 37.15W
Age: 75
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seem to remember that in the early days of New Labour that there was a plan to introduce the "None of the above" option to the ballot paper. I see that it has been quietly dropped. I wonder why??
Story here:- CHINGFORD: Odds offered on name-change candidate (From East London and West Essex Guardian Series)
"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
Hey guys, calm down. The senior officer has only given thirty years or so service to the country, probably (almost certainly) been under fire, and faced many dangers and hardships. The newly-elected MP has served the country for thirty minutes, and the greatest danger has been a heckler at a constituency meeting. Of course the MP should have first-class.
I'll look forward to seeing this in the next issue of Prime Minister's Regulations for the Royal Air Force.
A couple of weeks ago I undertook a journey on the East Coast mainline. Open Return tickets were:
1st Class £325
Standard £225
I am (was?) entitled to travel 1st Class, and did so, but by booking 2 x single tickets in advance, planning carefully and accepting a degree of risk, I did so for £86.
Next time, I think I will leave it later, travel Standard and let Gordon manage the risk.
By the way, I can't see too many generals (or airships) travelling by train Standard Class.
STH
A couple of weeks ago I undertook a journey on the East Coast mainline. Open Return tickets were:
1st Class £325
Standard £225
I am (was?) entitled to travel 1st Class, and did so, but by booking 2 x single tickets in advance, planning carefully and accepting a degree of risk, I did so for £86.
Next time, I think I will leave it later, travel Standard and let Gordon manage the risk.
By the way, I can't see too many generals (or airships) travelling by train Standard Class.
STH
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This little gem, with the abolishment, sorry, realignment of Overseas IE with UK IE and other various adjustments, indicates that the thin end of the wedge is well and truly embedded. The hammering will now start in earnest.
Those that were entitled to 1st Class travel, whether you like it or not, have now, I believe, lost it forever. No Defence Minister of any colour is going to allow money to be spent in what might be perceived by the Treasury as a backward step...'and anyway when you were all travelling Standard it didn't make any difference!'
There will be much more to come...and mostly by stealth or trickery.
Those that were entitled to 1st Class travel, whether you like it or not, have now, I believe, lost it forever. No Defence Minister of any colour is going to allow money to be spent in what might be perceived by the Treasury as a backward step...'and anyway when you were all travelling Standard it didn't make any difference!'
There will be much more to come...and mostly by stealth or trickery.
"Those that were entitled to 1st Class travel, whether you like it or not, have now, I believe, lost it forever. No Defence Minister of any colour is going to allow money to be spent in what might be perceived by the Treasury as a backward step...'and anyway when you were all travelling Standard it didn't make any difference!'"
Sorry, but as one of those affected by this, I'm finding some of the reaction across the media and t'interweb a bit hysterical. People are always slagging off the MOD to save money, claiming we waste it. A PR option is taken to save a lot of money, rather than having to cut a capability, and people start getting upset.
I've seen a lot of righteous indignation today, but no one seems to say what is really being lost beyond a nicer seat. The journey time is the same length, and sure its a nicer space, but does this really affect your work that much?
Just remember that a few years ago MOD was in the media firing line for not stripping people of 1st class travel, now it is in the media firing line FOR stripping people of first class travel!
Sorry, but as one of those affected by this, I'm finding some of the reaction across the media and t'interweb a bit hysterical. People are always slagging off the MOD to save money, claiming we waste it. A PR option is taken to save a lot of money, rather than having to cut a capability, and people start getting upset.
I've seen a lot of righteous indignation today, but no one seems to say what is really being lost beyond a nicer seat. The journey time is the same length, and sure its a nicer space, but does this really affect your work that much?
Just remember that a few years ago MOD was in the media firing line for not stripping people of 1st class travel, now it is in the media firing line FOR stripping people of first class travel!
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The Deep South (Sussex)
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that the generals should check their contract of employment (or whatever passes for one in the armed services)
My bet is that first class travel is contractual for those officers and cannot be taken away by one of the freeloading MP's, even from a Scottish village.
Any legal action in this matter could be worth thinking about. It wouldn't cost too much for all of them to chip in with a decent lawyer.
My bet is that first class travel is contractual for those officers and cannot be taken away by one of the freeloading MP's, even from a Scottish village.
Any legal action in this matter could be worth thinking about. It wouldn't cost too much for all of them to chip in with a decent lawyer.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Island of Aphrodite
Age: 75
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Civil Servants
I bet the senior civil servants have not lost this perk. (Sir Humphrey won't allow it). You can imagine it on a MOD team on a trip: Civil Servants in First, Senior Officers in Standard.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northumbria
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would be nice to think that the people who make the most important decisions that affect soldier's, sailor's and airmen's lives might arrive at travel destinations reasonably refreshed and having been sitting in an environment where they can get some work done. It also goes without saying that if on arrival they have not been able to read their briefs properly or simply just make the wrong decision, it might cost the taxpayer millions. There is more at stake than the paltry difference in cost of a train ticket.
It sounds very much like someone deliberately giving two fingers to the military and is pretty standard these days for a Gov/Military relationship based upon mutual contempt.
It sounds very much like someone deliberately giving two fingers to the military and is pretty standard these days for a Gov/Military relationship based upon mutual contempt.
Jimlad1 - with you on this one. Damned if you do, damned if you don't!
As for the "they need to work" surely most, if not all, the work that our Generals (and Service equivalents) work on must be at least at RESTRICTED level and therefore shouldn't be worked on in a public environment (regardless of class of travel!). And cutting the header and footer off doesn't declassify a document. Wasn't an Admiral 'bubbled' to the press/police when another passenger (in first class ....) read the document over said Admirals shoulder and realised there was more to it than the 'unclassified' document it purported to be.
How about they catch the earlier train, be grateful for the time away from the office (it's not as if there aren't plenty of other starred officers who can hold the fort!), enjoy the view, read the paper and then do any pre-work for the meeting in the correct environment.
As for the "they need to work" surely most, if not all, the work that our Generals (and Service equivalents) work on must be at least at RESTRICTED level and therefore shouldn't be worked on in a public environment (regardless of class of travel!). And cutting the header and footer off doesn't declassify a document. Wasn't an Admiral 'bubbled' to the press/police when another passenger (in first class ....) read the document over said Admirals shoulder and realised there was more to it than the 'unclassified' document it purported to be.
How about they catch the earlier train, be grateful for the time away from the office (it's not as if there aren't plenty of other starred officers who can hold the fort!), enjoy the view, read the paper and then do any pre-work for the meeting in the correct environment.
Wrathmonk
In "standard class" - What planet are you on?!!!
Most of my experiences of "standard class" are sitting next to, or opposite, the individual below, who is normally accompanied by a 6pack of McEwans!!!
Hence, I normally take my car for most meetings.
The B Word
enjoy the view
Most of my experiences of "standard class" are sitting next to, or opposite, the individual below, who is normally accompanied by a 6pack of McEwans!!!
Hence, I normally take my car for most meetings.
The B Word