Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Reapers in Afghanistan

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Reapers in Afghanistan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Mar 2010, 15:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if it flies IFR in theatre, do you file a flight plan? Follow SIDs and STARs?

How do you know if it is getting iced up?

And by the way, I am TA officer and (recently unemployed) bizjet pilot - any chance of volunteering to fly one?
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2010, 17:47
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will leave the 'in theatre' questions to those who need to know. But rest assured it is all done correctly and integrated with the manned community.....
L J R is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2010, 20:14
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, but the question remains, how do you know if it is getting iced up?
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2010, 20:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,335
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Trim stab

How do you know if it is getting iced up?
Suspect icing? Then use the very expensive camera turret (MTS-B) to look at the leading edges or pylons, where ice should start first. Also, stay away from icing conditions (that needs high humidity and a range of cold - ie. certain levels in clouds, where the main sensor doesn't work very well for seeing the ground anyway!!!). Can't remember if there is an ice detection capability but I do remember that the intake has anti-icing. Also, Flight reported that GA's new version of MQ-9(Guardian) has "New features slated for first use on the Guardian include an electromagnetic expulsion de-icing system for wing and tail leading edges, an onboard traffic alert and collision avoidance system, a laser altimeter-based landing guidance system for pilots at altitudes below 100ft (30m), and a Jeppesen electronic flight bag for mission planning and weather information in the ground control station. " - see Guardian leads Predator B modernisation push

By the way, I'm sure most know, but for the slightly confused, you can fly Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) in Visual Met Conditions (VMC) but it is pretty tricky to fly Visual Flight Rules (VFR) in Instrument Met Conditions (VMC) - Reaper normally flies IFR in VMC and IMC in peacetime airspace (ie. USA et al). In warzones the rules for flightplans are somewhat different (most call them an Air Tasking Order request!!!).

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2010, 20:52
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the clarification on the IFR operating rules theatre v peacetime - your original posting raised a lot of questions...

But I reckon operators will still get caught out by icing if all they have to rely on is
stay away from icing conditions (that needs high humidity and a range of cold - ie. certain levels in clouds, where the main sensor doesn't work very well for seeing the ground anyway!!!).
because I can guarantee after several thousand hours of chugging around at medium levels in all weathers in a Beech that those rules of thumb are not always reliable.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2010, 21:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The MQ-9 has an ice detector located somewhere near the nose.

OAT readings are supplied to the pilot and WSO.

Crews will use the forward looking EO/IR camera and the Turret/Pod/MTS-B to determine if cloud or precipitation is in the area.

The Turret/Pod/MTS-B is also used to visually inspect the airframe to detect icing.

Will that do?
Prop-Ed is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2010, 08:36
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: with the spiders from mars
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there any reason for the Reaper crew in that photo to be wearing flying clothing?

Unfortunately all other options were discarded, a bloke down the pub that knows one of the geezers sisters boyfriends stated that:

1. More appropriate attire for the location such as t-shirts and flip flops during the day and more formal evening wear (think Liberace) were considered inappropriate and might smack of fun in an age when the serious business of warfighting is ongoing.

2. No1's, whilst certainly encouraging the impression of an altogether more romantic/glamorous/dashing* era of the RAF was deemed likely to be too uncomfortable for more than 1-2 hrs at a time, particularly for the older aircrew (read too fat).

3. No2's. Nope No1's or nothing. And naked was right out, at least til a Bootie gets his foot in the door.

4. Desert DPM. Good God Man and look like Percy! Apart from the rugged jawline, good looks and masculine charm (including the females? You decide!) how will anyone know they are aircrew

5. Temperate DPM. Sooo Cold War.

6. Specific UAV attire to be developed at exhorbitant cost, under a UOR, to fill a niche in this thrilling new and exciting branch of aviation. Still in the process of cost and evaluation apparently. Rumours have it that this will be delivered some time after its required and considerably over budget, but as I say, only rumour at this time so hush hush.

Unfortunately this required aircrew to look in their wardrobes for something to wear to work for prolonged periods of time. Fortunately however all aircrew have an excess of previously issued flying suits amassed through their illustrious careers on previous types. Given that aircrew are known to eat,sleep and drink in these things they were determined to be suitable for the task until something better can be sourced.

Hope this helps.

*delete as appropriate

Last edited by rathebelucky; 13th Mar 2010 at 09:00.
rathebelucky is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2010, 18:49
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
rathebelucky

Great post mate - some people, eh? I've never understood why so many 'Guins have issues with Flying Suits - I've heard less whining from an APU!

Although, given the Sqn's locale I would have thought some attire like this would be more appropriate? I think this might be one of the MACR WSOps?

The B Word is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2010, 18:52
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can someone who understands how to use this "white man's magic" known as the "tinternet", Hyperlink the above response for all future UAV threads to save thousands of future posts from future twots asking: " Why are they wearing flying suits!?" or " I heard out in Vegas, they wear flying suits!" etc etc.....

So if someone could rustle that up and make it happen, it'd be much appreciated.


Edited to clarify: That is the post above The B Word's (who posted his a split second before mine!).
Prop-Ed is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2010, 19:26
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: The higher plane of alcoholism..hic.
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At last... and now moving on, anyone?

Outrageously good post from rathebe, with this level of banter I weep for the future of other forums...

Maybe the advent of Unmanned / Uninhabited / Remotely Piloted / Other aviation (and ground/sea-viation too) can now get on with the business of being the biggest change to the warfighting community since the last biggest change (I forget, but was that balloons, planes, tanks, gunpowder or machine guns... all laughed at in their time).

Oops, fell off the fence, sorry...
Farm-for-sale is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2010, 19:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: on the edge of a big fall
Posts: 141
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Heliringer
Is there any reason for the Reaper crew in that photo to be wearing flying clothing?
Seldomfitforpurpose
Yep, because they can
Nah, bunch of tarts who struggle doing up buttons..................
higthepig is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2010, 23:36
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by higthepig
Nah, bunch of tarts who struggle doing up buttons..................
But they do look comfy though
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2010, 04:32
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The seats in the GCS are plenty comfy - they even go up and down and everything!

Now if only we could get some air con units that have temp settings other than "freeze your nuts off" and "cook all the computers", we'd be proper set!!

BTW the chick in the picture is cute...
Looks even better in her blues, as I recall!!

Last edited by TheInquisitor; 14th Mar 2010 at 04:47.
TheInquisitor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.