Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Stunty bunty truck

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Stunty bunty truck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Feb 2010, 18:30
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Italians have been displaying the forerunner to the C-27J like that for decades. Fiat/Aeritiala/Alenia G-222 displays.





Aeritalia G.222 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 21:07
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Just don't buy the demo model off the showroom floor!
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 22:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
If the RAF did buy it it would need new avionics and a radar that doesn't work, weaker engines and cheaper spars. It'd have to be built in Prestatyn by one-armed ex-holiday home owners... and still be expected to do the same loops and rolls as the 2005 brochure said.

Oh, and it would enter into service in about 10 years time at five times the current price, with a few gaps in the MAR.
Rigga is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 09:45
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would the trash haulers among you comment if the C27 Spartan a reasonable bang for your buck?
Abbeville is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 14:51
  #25 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Defense Secretary Gates cut the Army's buy of C-27J last year and it became an Air Force only program for about 40 Ac. The National Guard were planning to replace their C-23 Sherpas (a little known UK success) with C-27J. The Army have made the argument that they currently use CH-47s for the Tactical lift role, thus removing a critical rotary asset from its intended role.

Lawmakers press Gates to keep Army cargo plane - TheHill.com

“We believe that if implemented such cuts would impede the ability of the United States Army, specifically the Army National Guard, to meet intra-theater lift requirements for ‘the last tactical mile’ as well as severely constrain the Army and Air National Guard’s ability to respond to a domestic disaster,” the lawmakers wrote to Gates.

The Army in particular has been adamant about buying a smaller cargo aircraft that can go deep into the battlefield to deliver needed supplies to troops. The Army has been relying heavily on its Chinook helicopters for that purpose. Army officials have argued for months that Afghanistan’s terrain, for example, has put tremendous pressure on these helicopters, which are now filling the void of a cargo aircraft that can fly “the last tactical mile.”
PS. Epic bit of display flying on that clip, always better to see Bernoulli at work being assisted by Whittle, rather than the other way around.
Two's in is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 15:24
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oop North
Age: 57
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I remember correctly wasn't the US buy of the C-27J off of an Army requirement that the Airforce "hijacked".
And that the Army wanted a different aircraft, but the C-27J is the one the Airforce wanted.
Extg3 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 15:35
  #27 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would the trash haulers among you comment if the C27 Spartan a reasonable bang for your buck?
There's a definite niche for these things and were we not a bankrupt third world air force I reckon we would see an RAF mini fleet of these things involved in the small scale intra-theatre lift we currently burn up C130 hours on. They're also perfect for patrol insertions into smaller strips etc. Cheaper to run and, generally speaking, they deliver the same effect as the C130 (certainly in terms of how we use them).

To be honest though, UK Plc would get more operational utility out of such a platform if, sadly, it were operated by the Army. The level of risk avoidance in the RAF is now at such a level that it is frankly embarassing having to explain to the Army why you can't do X, Y and/or Z any more.....
StopStart is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 17:23
  #28 (permalink)  
Green Flash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Nutters, but quite brilliant, everything must be bolted to everything else, looks like it's a tough machine, might take a load of punishment and get you home - same donks as the J Herc? Didn't the boys do a similer show at RIAT? Carrying on in the fine tradition of the Italian Runway Ploughing team but without the sparks! A rather tasty bit of kit in the right/wrong hands, BZ to the crew too
 
Old 21st Feb 2010, 17:43
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK/Philippines/Italy
Age: 73
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would the trash haulers among you comment if the C27 Spartan a reasonable bang for your buck?
For hauling trash (and people for that matter) it may well be worth going back to 'old tech'.

The Blackburn Beverly was described to me once as 'a great ship. Take anything nowhere'.

True STOL performance, ugly as sin itself. Imagine an updated version, turboprops, fixed gear, unpressurized with the ability to take around 3 times the load of a CH47 in and out of 500 metre strips at twice the speed.
larssnowpharter is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 18:44
  #30 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Frankfurt
Age: 46
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anybody know who killed Archie Mitchell? Was it Phil?
Lufthansa Joe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.