Fire 'n' Forget

I am surprised 'Cocktail Party Cruise Lines' have not put in a forum title change request to justify the inclusion of the carriers yet

SASless

Aw...give a guy a break....it is my second language you know Guv!




























'Merican being my first!

sisemen

Troll??? Not me guv. Yer must be confusing me with someone else

Nope. It's not the usual slangfest between the two winged master race and the rest - it's more of a philosophical discussion as to the title of the forum that most accurately reflects what goes on here.

Personally, I don't really give a stuff as I have a foot in both camps, as it were. I just think that the word "aviation" covers a broader church than "aircrew"

Data-Lynx

According to the UK Border Agency under "CRM2.1 Legislation and aircrew", Section 33(1) of the Immigration Act 1971 defines crew members as:

Quote:

all persons actually employed in the working or service of an aircraft, including the captain.

All you need is an 'official flying badge' and UK identification with a current photograph. It goes on to specifically disclude snowdrops and other security types, so it cannot be all bad.

Gnd

Would that mean it becomes even more RAF bias as I presume NCOs would not be invited? Figures!