Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Sea Gripen anybody?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Sea Gripen anybody?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2010, 02:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sea Gripen anybody?

Very interesting, thought I might share this bit of info.

Saab offers naval Gripen to India | StratPost
Flyingblind is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 09:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Right here
Age: 50
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't this one fit the new British carriers rather nicely? Should be a lot cheaper than the F-35. Of course, capability would be lower too; depends on what one needs and can afford I suppose...
bjornhall is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 10:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That would normally be an attractive option until you remember which British Company has a fairly large piece of the Saab pie.
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 10:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Age: 54
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not only for the FAA - but wouldn't it represent a modernisation if not an improvement and be "Better" (not in a Top Trumps way) than the Harrier airframe now other than the VTOL capability

Rough Field? - Yup
Small Logs chain? - Yup
Swing role? - Yup

Useful for Rapid Reaction deployments prior to the infrastructure necessary for the Typhoon to come along?

Better or cheaper than the F/A-18 - ?

Not as 'good' or expensive as the F-35 - but still good for british jobs (if the deal is done right)
Finnpog is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 19:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: A place where Naval Aviators live
Age: 37
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is a tangent to this thread, Was a Marinised version of 'Typhoon' ever officially designed??
UKFAAROCKS is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 21:32
  #6 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Might be an excuse to jam in an EJ200 in preference to the current F414...
MarkD is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 09:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 530
Received 174 Likes on 93 Posts
this is a tangent to this thread, Was a Marinised version of 'Typhoon' ever officially designed??

Yep - complete with ventral periscope (!) to cure the AoA/glideslope/meatball visibility problem!
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 19:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ummm... BAe wrote out a proposal, and estimate, complete with their ideas to address the various problems, and estimates of time/cost.

However, no one spent the multiple of millions of Pounds, Euros, or Dollars to actually do the design work.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 09:20
  #9 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fairy Delta/Concorde-type droop snoot was one option (of many) I understand, there again, its quite easy to design a glossy brochure, doing the engineering however...
Gainesy is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2010, 16:08
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, Scotland
Age: 51
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didnt think any modern airforce would considered a single engined fighter for blue water operations now a days and yes i know the F-35 is single engined but its VTOL abilitys give it special abilitys .

For the record i like it and think its a great aircraft and i like even more the idea off not being wholey depenedant on the USA for parts/software(esp after the chinook code problems)

If they had or do invest the Eurofighter naval version could tick the boxes , off course there will be a lot to overcome

Off course its only my personal opinion
fallmonk is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2010, 16:25
  #11 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but its VTOL abilitys give it special abilitys .
Sorry, don't understand that, apart from the ability to keep most of the wreckage in one pile.

Droop snoot ref above was in regard to Typhoon BTW>
Gainesy is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2010, 16:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gainesy,

Think positive !

The VTOL capabilities do allow another ' Plan B ' ( as long as your single engine is working ) - remember Lt Ian ' Soapy ' Watson & the ship ' Alraigo ' ?
Double Zero is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 01:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that the USA have very unhelpfully blocked all foreign access to F-35 software source code, a navalised Gripen could be a very good alternative option!

It is a very neat little aircraft, and the Swedes have put some great design features in to it.
WeekendFlyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.