Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

£52.5 m a pop

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2010, 06:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,226
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
I'm sure the irony has not been lost that the thread, quite naturally, sucks in Nimrod 2000/RMPA/MRA4/Nimrod 2012.

Common denominator? Same MoD(PE) 2 Star. Same briefing. (It's turning to rats boss, you've gotta listen to those who know). Same reply. Same result.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2010, 13:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Devon
Age: 71
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Belated thanks for the info Tallsar .

Cheers Grandfer
grandfer is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2010, 20:39
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WSM
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
evalu8ter,

Pretty much what I said then but without any comment on the contractual arrangements (although I accept that this may be outside your Area of Expertise).

It just occurred to me that an acronym for Area of Expertise (AoE) might be an incredibly useful tool on this forum? Like IIRC, IMHO LOL etc
endplay is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2010, 22:35
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in the mess
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evalu8ster "sometime in the next 5 years will receive another Glass cockpit under the auspices of Project Julius (which is similar to the one it would have got under fix to field...)."

Pardon me???!! Those 2 cockpits (F2F vs Julius) differ massively in their usability and HMI. I would say they are not similar.

Going back to the original thread, at £52.5M a pop, they are expensive, yes, but take the project cost of Merlin (which, bear in mind started in the Seventies), divide by the no of ac bought by the UK PLC and you'll find the unit cost in excess of not only Chinook 3R, but Typhoon as well. It's ok though, it's good to have ASW cabs bodged into SH. We did that in the Falklands, too, didn't we?
nice castle is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 00:09
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Down West
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a one trick Pony

Whilst I agree that the Merlin is a bit pricey, there can be no comparison cost wise, with an aircraft that was already in service (in one form). The training systems, GSE, support organisations etc were all in place. Yes updates to equipment and ispecs can be expected but the new Chinooks are expensive because of a cock up. The Merlin has had to be started from scratch and that will inevitably incur more startup costs, that have to be shared out per airframe. Just see how much the training at Westlands cost before we set up the MTF at Culdrose.
The good thing about an aircraft like the Merlin Mk1 is its versatility, the submarine threat is less (at the moment), but a couple of bolts undone/done up, and in minutes the aircraft can reconfigure for several different roles from ASW to full Casevac with stretcher mounts, all this in a cab with excellent comms and command setup too. 21 troops seating, 2 GPMG points, 5,000 and 10,000lb lift and variations anywhere in between. They are soon going to strap the AEW radar onto the cab as well, so all in all, a lot more useful than it may seem at first.
oldgrubber is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.