Merlin changes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Merlin changes
with the retiremant of the Sea King fleet what is the future of the AEW element of the fleet air arm?
I note the plans for the Merlin HMA fleet includes the upgrade of all but 7 or 8 will thease airframes or HC3 airframes be converted to provide an AEW variant?
I note the plans for the Merlin HMA fleet includes the upgrade of all but 7 or 8 will thease airframes or HC3 airframes be converted to provide an AEW variant?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southampton
Age: 54
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Royal Navy orignially bought 44 HM1 Merlins, now down to 42 extant airframes. HM2 upgrade was for 30 airframes with an option on 8 more, the option was not taken up. Currently likely remaining 10-12 airframes could be converted to ASaC standard using radar from SK ASaC7s (13 in service). 12 Merlin ASaC 5 (?) would allow current sqns (849, 854 and 857) to remain at current strengths.
RAF Merlin HC3/3a fleet currently around 28 airframes, all of which will have to be altered for Naval use (folding tails, rotors, and adding tie down points mainly). Merlin is a modular design, so probably not that difficult proposition. Likely to mean designation change to HC4 (means the CHF can continue to use paperwork currently in use, an unexpected saving
).
RAF Merlin HC3/3a fleet currently around 28 airframes, all of which will have to be altered for Naval use (folding tails, rotors, and adding tie down points mainly). Merlin is a modular design, so probably not that difficult proposition. Likely to mean designation change to HC4 (means the CHF can continue to use paperwork currently in use, an unexpected saving
).
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 50
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great, just what we need. Another RW mounted radar system with all of the height and range compromises that go with it. No matter that the new carriers will be easily big enough for a FW platform.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No matter that the new carriers will be easily big enough for a FW platform.
That was an option which was investigated....but...you wouldn't believe how much a FW ASaC was going to cost....Hence the RW option.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Scotland
Age: 45
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No matter that the new carriers will be easily big enough for a FW platform
In the future perhaps this role could be suited to a UAV that would bring some of the capability that Merlin lacks?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: See that little island just above France? Yeah, there...
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Were the US Marines not looking at an ASaC version of the V22 last year? The biggest cost was apparently pressurising the cabin - possibly wait out a little while, let them foot the bill then leap on the outcome? (assuming of course it ever happens and I'm not just making stuff up)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Scotland
Age: 45
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't really comment on the most recent developments but what I understood was that a MASC capable Osprey would forgo a pressurised cabin because of the expense and difficulties of making this modification. So even the Osprey would not be as capable in this role as a contemporary FW type, but still significantly better than, say, Merlin ASaC.
In the current economic climate I don't think even the vaunted US Marine Corp could expect to get this out of the DoD, particularly when the US Navy has more capable aircraft available now, today. But even if they did I don't imagine there would be a significant number of aircraft produced to really make this affordable from the UK's point of view.
In the current economic climate I don't think even the vaunted US Marine Corp could expect to get this out of the DoD, particularly when the US Navy has more capable aircraft available now, today. But even if they did I don't imagine there would be a significant number of aircraft produced to really make this affordable from the UK's point of view.
