Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Jointery not necessarily best practice

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Jointery not necessarily best practice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Sep 2001, 00:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Wet Land
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Jointery not necessarily best practice

As one who has experienced "jointery" first hand and has seen the RAF shafted several times in the adoption of "best practice" is there anyone out there with a tale of a battle we won ??
Why when the AAC is so small, and fly relatively unsophisticated aircraft do they have such a say in JHC ?? In fact in these fiscally tight times cant we just absorb them??
Jointery Boy is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2001, 00:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Uk( well sometimes)
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

“Jointery” bloody marvellous idea When are we going for that then ?
Rude C'man is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2001, 03:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,501
Received 90 Likes on 36 Posts
fish

Ah, Saturday morning - you're up a bit early for your fishing trip, eh?

Thud_and_Blunder is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2001, 12:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Unless I'm mistaken, the "small" AAC have considerably more helos than you light blue boys!
Tourist is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2001, 13:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Uk( well sometimes)
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

One on the line already my what good bait your using?
Rude C'man is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2001, 14:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Jointery lad,
Methinks think you might have missed something here. Yes, the AAC maybe small but they still have more heicopters than the RAF and the Navy put together. I think you will also find that, unless things have changed in the 2 years since I left, that the main role, (and raison d'etre), of the SH force, and most of the Transport fleet, is to support the Army on ground operations at least until the air superiority version of the Puma enters service.
(******, didn't mean to let that slip - for god's sake don't tell Hoon!!!!)
Fortyodd is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2001, 20:00
  #7 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

What, the Rooivalk?
Gainesy is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2001, 20:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: God's county
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I'd be quite interested to know exactly how you feel the RAF was 'shafted'?
Sumo664 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2001, 22:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

They're really going for it aren't they?! Quality fishing, dumb fish!
Hengist Pod is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2001, 02:12
  #10 (permalink)  
Big Green Arrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Whoah there! Somebody's been reading fly fishing by J R Heartly!!!
 
Old 9th Sep 2001, 13:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: ivory tower basement
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Excellent fishing. Oh, and it's spelt 'Hartley'.

bluntie is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2001, 22:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: God's county
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

>The AAC may have more F700s than the other >forces put together. But, you know as well >as the rest of us that you could hardly >muster a Sqn and half of serviceable ones.

Thats a fair point and is down to chronic underfunding over a load of years allied to massive overcommitment rather than any inherent AAC/REME failings. Might be worth checking out the latest JHC rolling brief though which for the first time in living memory shows Lynx as the top for serviceability!

> On a more serious note: my objection to
> jointery is that diversity brings
> flexibility. The RAF/AAC/RN all have the
> sort of different nuances that make
> operations such as Northern Ireland work. > Additionally, I believe we are watching a > weak and half-hearted form of
> amalgamation, not jointery (a word
> invented for this very purpose).

For 'best practise' read lowest common denominator!
Sumo664 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2001, 23:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: home, home on the Range
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Not true,

RAF loggies have lead the transformation of the DLO and have taken over the Army's hallowed centre of excellence at West Moors. They have been instrumental in not only saving cash by improving the way we do business but also have had a major insulating effect in preventing monumental cuts completely destroying the front line. (and before you hurl your accusations - make sure you are certain you know which organisation it is that has just screwed your yearly funding, our sister organisations make good examples of how it should not be done)

We have finally persuaded the Army to use an IT system that is not only more complex than a stand-alone 386 with MS Works on it, but one that we all actually use and we have battered our way into the Navy's Civvy empire and almost fainted at the complete detachment from front-line tasking and its link with finance that exists there.

Our eventual aim is to ensure that front line resources are matched to requirements (many beleive we have enough money to do this, its just not being used correctly) but we will have to fight our way through the inexplicable Group system and STC role offices first! That will take some time as we are completely out-ranked (your guess as to by which Branch members)
only1leftmate! is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2001, 00:31
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Grobelling through the murk to the sunshine above.
Age: 60
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Oh that's good. The next time I spend a few days within a couple of miles of a major international airport waiting for a "D state" spare part to arrive, I'll remind myself how good our loggies are.
Pub User is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2001, 22:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: err not tellin anymore
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I hate to agree a with a stacker here in public But he has a point,

I'm in a TA unit which carries out an Air Support role north of the border (that narrows it down a tad!) When ever any squadron in the regiment needs spares for our plant we order it through the RAF system on our parent station and then transfer it ourselves from our HQ Squadron to the Squadron that needs it, it takes at least half the time than the dedicated army system takes and we usually even get the part we ordered which is always a bonus
Gash Handlin is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.