Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

TCAS + Mil Aviation

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

TCAS + Mil Aviation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Sep 2001, 20:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Down the road from RAF Coleby Grange.
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

HM & Marine,

Ta!

Blue.
Blue Stuff is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2001, 17:46
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The other problem with installing TCAS in TACAIR aircraft is the lack of available real estate in the cockpit for another box. The TCAS systems that do exist are a fairly straightforward fit for cargo and similar aircraft but for TACAIR integration into the total avionics fit calls for lots of engineering labor hours (for labor hours read money).

Another collision avoidance system in existance is Automatic Dependent Surveillance. There are several flavors but the basic idea is that the airplane knows where it is (GPS, RNAV, inertial, whatever) and then transmits it to everyone or just some specific people on a data link. The receiver then knows where the transmiting aircraft is and through the miracle of electricity can but a blip on a screen or give a traffic alert at certain parameters etc. Problem is that like with TCAS unless everybody is equiped and operating you can't be sure you are going to be alerted to the presence of the oter aircraft.

As a civil operator I have run across low level routes that happened to be in use even when NOTAMs didn't say they were, and in any case when there are NOTAMs most times they are useless because it gives a route and a day, so I guess all civil aircraft should stay out of that airspace for the day...particularly galling on weekends, when the reserves do a lot of practice.
RATBOY is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 05:11
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

TCAS on the C130-J works and it is great!!!
It actually creates more lookout and SA.
Worth every penny as the fleet has had to use it in anger on several occasions already.
8.33 - no probs, now just waiting for the RVSM calibration (oh yes and the FM stuff!!!)

"happiness is 70 tons and a HUD!"
T_Handle is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 09:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,850
Received 328 Likes on 115 Posts
Post

WHAT?? Are you really saying that the C130Joke came without FM-immunity compliant VHF communications and navigation receivers?? Even though it was well know that AWN84 was going to make them mandatory?

[ 07 September 2001: Message edited by: BEagle ]
BEagle is online now  
Old 7th Sep 2001, 20:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

You got it!!!!
Our lords and masters (and contract writers) turned it down - i am led to believe.
You know the story about upgrades rather than replacements!
Anyway we probably payed extra to have it taken out!!!!

Just as well the gulf has nice weather coz we are there all the time.
T_Handle is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2001, 00:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Total Obscurity
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Having flown with TCAS regularly, you'll never want to fly without it again. You feel naked. Its bloody good. A bit like SKE but there's a damn sight more a/c with the transponders.

Hi Fergi, how are you doin'? Husband of VP/HR.
4 of 7 is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2003, 03:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wilts
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does this answer your question Crashondeck?
Albert on Tour is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2003, 17:04
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Age: 72
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A reminder to everyone at low level. TCAS is not generally fitted to any of the charity funded HEMS helos in the UK. Especially those helos operating in the fast jet region. Most HEMS sorties are short and generally involve a landing and takeoff through a fast jet route.

In 2 years flying in this area I've seen lots of you in time. I just hope you see me!
Bertie Thruster is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2003, 19:40
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North of the Border
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Albert - I feel embarassed now for not taking the time to search it out myself.

Bertie T - I agree. I've seen loads too and heard as many on uniform and never seen them.

It worries me that TDAs seem to get busted and HEMS/Police operators seem to have their necks on the line too.

Now I know why SAR birds are painted that rather baby pooh shade of yellow.

My question to the grown ups in the MOD would be if TCAS saved the loss of one Tornado/Tucano/Harrier/Hawk...+ crew would that not pay for TCAS in all their a/c.

Reminds me of a story of a pilot long lining in a forest, took off and found himself in formation (briefly) with the red arrows.
Crashondeck is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2003, 23:51
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the ORP
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Light at the end of the tunnel? I hear a trial fit is going into the Tucano.
2 TWU is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2003, 00:54
  #31 (permalink)  
contact_tower
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This january i experienced the following scenario while working our radar position: One of the a/c on the freq, a RoNoAF Bell-412SP flying VFR night L/L on goggels (below TMA, G airspace), I had no other reported traffic and informed the pilot of that when he req FIS. I allso had an FPL on a USAF MC-130 enroute L/L from Alta/ENAT. Suddenly the helo pilot cried out that a blacked out Herc had just passed below him, and that he himself was at 300ft AGL. (Everyone that have visited us know the limited radar coverage L/L btw )

The Herc checked in about 5 mins later, he had not seen a thing.

TCAS...... why bother.....
 
Old 7th Jul 2003, 04:02
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,088
Received 58 Likes on 36 Posts
TCAS, why bother..You got to be kidding?

I would rather give up an engine than the metal detector flying in and out of GA crazy places like S. California.
West Coast is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2003, 18:18
  #33 (permalink)  
contact_tower
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You got to be kidding?
Affirm!
 
Old 16th Jul 2003, 00:30
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,088
Received 58 Likes on 36 Posts
Sit in the pointy end for awhile and I assure you you won't ever want to give TCAS up.
West Coast is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2003, 04:48
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,336
Received 83 Likes on 34 Posts
Thumbs down TCAS on FJs

There is no TCAS fitted to any current fast jets (FJs) in the world. Even F22, F35, M2000-5, Rafale, Gripen and Typhoon aren't toted to be fitted with it - Question recently asked to all the manufacturers at Farnboro' and Paris.

Why? - It doesn't work! With the 30,000' per minute climb rates, high speeds and quick changes of direction by FJs, the TCAS would false alarm a lot. Hence, the UK Airprox Board is often troubled with TCAS RAs and TAs from airliners with FJs working in close proximity - but never in danger of colliding! (Plus the heroic TCAS obviously saves them!). The formation issue is also valid. The GR4 is being trialled with CWS (Collision Warning System) but I believe that QinetiQ/BAES are having problems with it.

If anyone knows of a working FJ TCAS then please let the MOD know!

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2003, 02:41
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That'll be a good one QinetiQ clearing CWS. How do they propose to test that then?!

Probably get MAR reccs about the same time that GR4 hits the scrapheap.
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2003, 16:51
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Excuse my ignorance to equipment on fast jets, but as a civvie driver, I was wondering if your (as you term it) one or two seat FJs have radar intercept capabilities, surely that would avoid most if not all TA/RA incidents with us. If you have it, use it. I know you guys like sneaking around as covertly as possible, but in the advent of near misses and incidents, prudence should demand that your radar system should pick up civilian a/c and allow your drivers to maintain separation based on the information available to you. I may be completely wrong. (don't bite my head off, I'm just asking)
I for one am glad you are up here sharing the airspace, I don't mind seeing you guys passing us with your hair on fire anyday.
slingsby is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.