Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Fuel as a weapon question

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Fuel as a weapon question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Nov 2009, 22:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Fuel as a weapon question

It has always intrigued me about whether a fast jet dumping fuel over a ground attack formation, followed by a second fast jet 15-30 seconds later hitting burners at last minute would ignite and provide an effective weapon.

Has it been tried or is it worthless given possible loss of 2 fast movers unless as a last ditch manouvre ?
racedo is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2009, 23:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Age: 54
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In one sense the RAAF have 'tested' the concept with their Pigs.
Finnpog is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2009, 23:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the risk of sounding frivolous you seem to be suggesting the equivalent of "lighting farts". It's fun but, as a weapon system, rarely effective... trust me...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2009, 23:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: England
Age: 35
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Impossible, in my opinion.

A) The fuel would vaporize/particles would be too spread out for the fire to actually start.
B) The second jet would have to be low. Which isn't a great idea really. And I mean 15 feet low.

Inr eality the jet is moving too fast for the fuel to be combustable in a trail, and it could never be lit by the second jet unless it was practically scraping the ground.
TheOptimist is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2009, 23:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,958
Received 2,858 Likes on 1,225 Posts
The F111 used to do it as a decoy for heat seekers I believe, See

F-111 'dump and burn' to light up festival - Queensland - BrisbaneTimes


The Germans experimented with a flame thrower mounted in the tail of the HE 111 during the war as an anti aircraft weapon, it was soon abandoned as it was found attacking pilots seeing flames eminating from the back end assumed they were causing damage and pressed home the attack.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 05:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Well, Lincolnshire
Age: 69
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The F3 guy who jettisoned both his (full) KILO fit underwing tanks (by accident) on departure from Leeming, in the mid '80's, certainly would have made a mess of any ground troops who were planning to attack the Oak Tree filling station on the A1.
taxydual is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 06:40
  #7 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Racedo, I am surprised no one has mentioned the fuel/air explosive used in the Vietnam war and possibly later. Not quite what you suggest but on a much larger scale and self-ignited.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 07:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 791
Received 34 Likes on 11 Posts
You are obviously not familiar with the tactic proposed for a Shackleton, when attacked by a jet fighter. Apart from some of the early Shacks, which had a mid upper turret, our only guns were forwards firing. The trick was to let the fighter get on your tail, then jettison fuel. This would over-fuel his engine, causing him to accelerate past you. As he did so, he was easy meat for the front turret.
Another time, I'll tell you about the green paint anti- submarine ploy.
oxenos is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 08:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
When doing fighter affiliation with the Valiant a two second burst with the underwing fuel jettison switch was the last ditch defence. Only 2-300 lbs a side but the wall of fuel was enough to put them off.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 09:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has someone been watching ' Die Hard 2 ' once too often ?

It also shows remarkably quick ejection seat strap-in procedures.

'Die Hard 4' is a much better film ( seriously ) and also shows how to down an F-35B with a brick !
Double Zero is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 10:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know the very latest developments on this subject, but fuel air explosives
(used by ground forces) were making a big come back recently.

It involves much less risk to attacking troops to fill a building/bunker with a
'spray' of fuel, rather than having to clear each room separately with grenades and
rifle fire.

The defenders have two choices (which they know instantly the fuel becomes
apparent). They either come out, or get incinerated (that is of course if the
attackers give them the choice).
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 10:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NW FL
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd have the second jet simply jettison defensive flares to ignite the fuel from the first jet...
US Herk is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 11:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,815
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Thermobaric weapons, including fuel-air explosives, have actually been around for quite a while.

If you Google the term, you will find some interesting information.
BEagle is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 12:11
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thermobaric weapons
Not quite the same as the OP's proposition I say...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 12:12
  #15 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,409
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
Kilgore: I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like......victory....

How to make napalm

Napalm carpet bombing in Vietnam
ORAC is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 12:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some time after we started using IR Jammers on the Puma in Northern Ireland many many moons ago, we had a bit of a major problem whilst airborne that required us to dump fuel quickly in order to facilitate a safe landing at a near bye fort (v heavy). A lynx called us to say we were on fire, lots of fire. It turned out that the fuel dump was positioned to get rid of fuel over the Jammer, which was of course super hot and we had 20 foot flames shooting from the back of the aircraft

After a quick re-appraisal and a change of under wear the situation was successfully resolved. make sure the jammers cool before you dump chaps
Roger Sofarover is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 12:55
  #17 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stop faffing about and make some napalm, its simple, effective and really rather photogenic. If they don't like it, they should stay home and tend their goats.

Hmm ORAC beat me to it. Why the recipe though? Any Fifth Former could run you up a batch in my day, Standards, mutter, dribble.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 13:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK/Philippines/Italy
Age: 73
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect it would be pretty difficult to get it to work. The difference between the LEL (Lower Explosive Limit) and the UEL (Upper Explosive Limit for kerosene is pretty narrow in terms of ppm (parts per million). If outside that band, well, to put it simply nothing happens.

Bit like a car running too rich or too lean. Doesn't start.
larssnowpharter is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 13:22
  #19 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,409
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
In Korea and Vietnam every grunt/company brewed their own to protect their camp. They'd set up a ring of 50 gallon oil drum filled with a jellied 50/50 mix of gasoline and washing powder - Daz, Lux whatever, then hang thermite grenades inside the filler cap, with the pins tied to trip wires.

Air America used to make up their own as well, for when the troops called for help but the USAF said the weather was too bad. They'd stick the thermite grenade inside a jam jar stick in the filler cap. The glass was keep the lever on the grenade when the pin was pulled. They'd fly over the target position, pull the pin and kick the drum out the door and let gravity and impact do the rest....
ORAC is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 14:02
  #20 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Next, Aunty Bessie's Thermite Grenades.
Gainesy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.