Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

99, no flakes!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jul 2001, 12:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool 99, no flakes!

Just wanted to say thanks to all those RAF, DPA and Boeing folks involved in organising yesterday's press facility at Brize, particularly to the 99 Sqn guys for giving us a spin in UK2. Fine aircraft - not that I needed convincing!

Moose
sprucemoose is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2001, 13:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,839
Received 279 Likes on 113 Posts
Post

Hope you'll get a similar chance when the first RAF (not contractor) owned Boeing 767K takes to the skies in a few years' time!
BEagle is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2001, 13:05
  #3 (permalink)  

Yes, Him
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Looks like they got the spin-recovery technique right then.
Gainesy is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2001, 13:20
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

BEagle,

A very kind offer, which we will certainly hold you to in about six to eight years time!

Bear in mind that the C-17s are contractor-owned assets though - for the time being at least!

Moose
sprucemoose is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2001, 18:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Land of the Sabbath and of the Priest
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

I second that, Spruce - well said. Thanks, 99.

Perhaps someone could run a book on how many Ppruners were aboard? There was one significant absentee, though - where was Jackonicko??
Chairborne 09.00hrs is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2001, 18:45
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Good point, Chairborne. You missed a good one JN - back home counting your royalties?! Spotter question - can anyone confirm our flight code? I have Ascot 885, but am not 100%.
sprucemoose is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2001, 00:42
  #7 (permalink)  
Overstretch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

When are 2 Gp going to ditch that dreadful callsign. I heard a rumour that it stood for Air Support Command Operational Transport? Excuse me for being picky but just when did ASC disband?

Lights blue touch paper and.......
 
Old 21st Jul 2001, 02:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Glad to see HM's most expensive mobility asset being put to such good use - I sincerely hope the crew got some good training out of it.

Methinks the PR battle has already been lost over this one, anyway.
Red Snow is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2001, 11:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Overstretch, I think the answer to your question, in the eyes of the Ascot died in the wools is "never, over my now withering body". I'm sure there are many still around, sitting in high seats for whom the word is sacrosanct. Whatever happened to Rafair, it never sounded like rough air to me.
Art Field is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2001, 19:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Over Here
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

But "Rough Air" would be quite appropriate these days!!

15/15 flex is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2001, 11:37
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Surprise, surprise, a moan from some bean counter about a media facility.

Bear in mind, Red Snow, that due to the election the RAF weren't allowed to have any press along when UK1 was delivered, so this was the first chance to show off their new aircraft.

As for the PR battle having already been lost, you should talk to some service people about the C-130J and A400M!
sprucemoose is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2001, 14:45
  #12 (permalink)  
Sangiovese
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Thought ASCOT meant "Arrive Sir? Chance of tomorrow".

In all seriousness, I seem to recollect the change was considered a few years back (early 90's) but since it was so well known globally (or notorious?) the name stuck.

Are all the old callsigns still in the FIH?
 
Old 23rd Jul 2001, 16:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Thanks, Moose. I've been called many things in my time, but a bean-counter? That's a new one.


Re PR battle - C-17 is a very good aircraft. 99 is a very tight professional unit. No criticism of either intended for a second , in fact praise for both. But £750 m to lease something we could have bought for less? God knows what the per-minute flying costs work out to.

As I said in my previous post, I sincerely hope the crew got some good training out of it. That's all.
Red Snow is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2001, 18:19
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Cheers, Red!

Okay, the phrase bean-counter was perhaps a bit harsh - are you a concerned tax payer or a peeved mil type with better things to use the budget on?

I fully agree that the logic of leasing the aircraft for more than you could buy them for is a bit peculiar, but it's better than waiting years for an alternative.

As for the per minute cost: £750 million (for the initial seven years, I guess) for four aircraft, with a planned annual total of 3,000 hours to go on the fleet (fly more, pay more, fly less, pay less), shouldn't be too tough to calculate.

As for whether the crew got any training value out of flying us, then no, I doubt that they did, but they already have over 200 hours flying UK1 and UK2 since they were accepted, so what's an hour between friends?
sprucemoose is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.