Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Nuclear Deterrent

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Nuclear Deterrent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Oct 2009, 09:18
  #81 (permalink)  
PTT
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they're enemies of Christian, patriotic America, they deserve no equality.
I do hope this is said tongue-in-cheek.

What I also find interesting is the ideological inconsistency in US thinking: on the one hand there is mythical faith in the privately-owned firearm as the Great Equalizer (81 or 90 such firearms per 100 inhabitants there) and total opposition in the Great Equalizing powers that come with having your own set of nuclear weapons. After all, why shouldn't "little guy" countries be as equal as "little guy" Americans?
That would be down to the NPT that these countries signed up to. It was an agreement not to want to have a gun in return for a bit of help "paying the bills", so to speak. I wonder how many Americans would give up their firearms in return for a 10% reduction in income tax...
PTT is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2009, 18:45
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are absolutely NO conceivable circumstances in which a UK PM would authorise the launch of a nuclear weapon.

We know that.

They know that.

It's catastrophically expensive.

Why bother?
Vox Populi is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2009, 19:00
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Vox Populi,

Aren't there? How do you know?

No we don't.

No they don't.

It's NOT catastrophically expensive.

If you don't bother you could be subject to some pretty compelling 'persuasion,' remember Suez?
pr00ne is online now  
Old 17th Oct 2009, 19:23
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You need to remember that the second missile of each salvo is targetted on to NYC.....thats the only way the salvo would be allowed to be released.
vecvechookattack is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.