Nimrod entry into service
Thread Starter
Nimrod entry into service
Is it an oversight or is there no interest in the fact that the 40th anniversary of the Nimrod entering service on the 2nd of October 1969 has passed without comments?
Maybe it's because it happened at St. Mawgan and not in Scotland!
pmills575
Maybe it's because it happened at St. Mawgan and not in Scotland!
pmills575
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bury St. Edmunds
Age: 64
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The real reason is the Gawdon Brown doesn't want to remind everyone, not least the next of kin of those lost on board XV230, that the Nimrod is way past its "sell by" date.
It would also draw attention to the delay into service of the MR4A. It is also sobering to recall that we once had 46 Nimrods to be replaced now by less than 10.
MB
It would also draw attention to the delay into service of the MR4A. It is also sobering to recall that we once had 46 Nimrods to be replaced now by less than 10.
MB
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
BS, I think he was using poetic licence to point out the age of the aircraft.
We still remember the rapid development and obsolescence of aircraft during WW2 and the relatively short life of post-war aircraft such as Valiant, Victor 1 and Vulcan 1 with an equally rapid turn-over of fighter types.
In contrast, since the 1960s, we have seen what would have been staggering longevity of even fighter types - Tornados 1982-, Dominie 1966, C130 ditto, VC10 ditto. We still have to get our minds around airframe lives of 30-40 years.
Interesting when you consider the lives of modern warships. The Ark is coming to the end of its life at a mere 25 years.
We still remember the rapid development and obsolescence of aircraft during WW2 and the relatively short life of post-war aircraft such as Valiant, Victor 1 and Vulcan 1 with an equally rapid turn-over of fighter types.
In contrast, since the 1960s, we have seen what would have been staggering longevity of even fighter types - Tornados 1982-, Dominie 1966, C130 ditto, VC10 ditto. We still have to get our minds around airframe lives of 30-40 years.
Interesting when you consider the lives of modern warships. The Ark is coming to the end of its life at a mere 25 years.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But all have had major servicings during their lifetimes, and had knackered components replaced. No different really to the AT fleet. Just because it's of a certain age doesn't mean it should be dammed. Lots of various elderly aircraft still giving good service worldwide.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes
on
30 Posts
Is it an oversight or is there no interest in the fact that the 40th anniversary of the Nimrod entering service on the 2nd of October 1969 has passed without comments?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bury St. Edmunds
Age: 64
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BS
When I did my METS course at Finningley in 1981 two of my contemporaries were posted to 236 OCU at St. Mawgan. To find that one could graduate from Cranwell from 45(R) Sqn today (nearly 30 years later) and be posted to the essentially the same aircraft tells a pretty damming story of failed procurement programmes. This would apply to postings to Nimrods, VC10s, Tristars and C130K as all remain a posting option to a METS graduate.
The MR4A, the FSTA, A400M and C130J programmes were/are all late and your guess is a good as mine as to when the A400 and FSTA will actually arrive.
At least the other METS posting options such as Shackleton, Andover, Canberra, Vulcan and Victor have been put out to grass. I assure you I was not being puerile - the fact is I was being very serious - perhaps you can correct me if you think the above is factually incorrect.
MB
When I did my METS course at Finningley in 1981 two of my contemporaries were posted to 236 OCU at St. Mawgan. To find that one could graduate from Cranwell from 45(R) Sqn today (nearly 30 years later) and be posted to the essentially the same aircraft tells a pretty damming story of failed procurement programmes. This would apply to postings to Nimrods, VC10s, Tristars and C130K as all remain a posting option to a METS graduate.
The MR4A, the FSTA, A400M and C130J programmes were/are all late and your guess is a good as mine as to when the A400 and FSTA will actually arrive.
At least the other METS posting options such as Shackleton, Andover, Canberra, Vulcan and Victor have been put out to grass. I assure you I was not being puerile - the fact is I was being very serious - perhaps you can correct me if you think the above is factually incorrect.
MB
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Madbob, you make a weak case.
You fail to recognise that aircraft are maintained to increasingly long safe-life standards. I am not entering the Nimrod crash debate but of the types you mentioned,
Shackleton 1949-1990 - 41 years
Canberra 1949-2006 - 57 years but some still flying
Victor 1952-1993 - 41 years - accept that this involved two designs
Vulcan 1953-1984 - 31 years - ditto
VC10 1962 - 47 years
Andover 1965-1994 - 29 years - some still flying. Their short service was a result of defence policy changes and economics and nothing to do with capability or airframe life.
Dominie 1965- 44 years
Puma 1968- 41 years
You will see that lives of 40 plus years are the historical norm and not an exception. The MRA4 is extensively rebuilt. Using the above in-service dates for a Mk 1 it will certainly be well passed 60 when it retires but with more recent design and construction techniques that should not be an issue.
You fail to recognise that aircraft are maintained to increasingly long safe-life standards. I am not entering the Nimrod crash debate but of the types you mentioned,
Shackleton 1949-1990 - 41 years
Canberra 1949-2006 - 57 years but some still flying
Victor 1952-1993 - 41 years - accept that this involved two designs
Vulcan 1953-1984 - 31 years - ditto
VC10 1962 - 47 years
Andover 1965-1994 - 29 years - some still flying. Their short service was a result of defence policy changes and economics and nothing to do with capability or airframe life.
Dominie 1965- 44 years
Puma 1968- 41 years
You will see that lives of 40 plus years are the historical norm and not an exception. The MRA4 is extensively rebuilt. Using the above in-service dates for a Mk 1 it will certainly be well passed 60 when it retires but with more recent design and construction techniques that should not be an issue.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just been ISK way for the past 2 weeks and the 40th annivesary paint job was doing its circuit bashing duties some of the days. Nice paint job!
Good to see you again.My favourite part of the UK.
Good to see you again.My favourite part of the UK.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Nimrod Fleet has never been in better shape IMHO , post the hot air duct replacements and recent maintenance reacting to husbandry issues etc etc ive never seen them in such good nick its been a lot of work and it would be a shame to see them retire in 18 months.
Anniversary paint job?
Perhaps they should have used this infamous paint job to commemorate 40 years of the Mighty Muncher:
In the Spring of 1969, I was on detachment at RAF Kinloss as a very junior Flt Cdt. I was sleeping off my 14+ hours trip in a Mk3ph3 Shacklebomber when my room was shaken by an almighty roar - it was the pre-production Mk1 Nimrod showing off its capabilities. And very impressive it was too!
Trip home at the end of the detachment was unusual - driven to RNAS Lossiemouth by some lunatic Wg Cdr in the RAF's last Standard Vanguard estate car, then down to Yeovilton in a Sea Vampire flown by a friend of my father. About 22 hours less than the train journey had taken!
In the Spring of 1969, I was on detachment at RAF Kinloss as a very junior Flt Cdt. I was sleeping off my 14+ hours trip in a Mk3ph3 Shacklebomber when my room was shaken by an almighty roar - it was the pre-production Mk1 Nimrod showing off its capabilities. And very impressive it was too!
Trip home at the end of the detachment was unusual - driven to RNAS Lossiemouth by some lunatic Wg Cdr in the RAF's last Standard Vanguard estate car, then down to Yeovilton in a Sea Vampire flown by a friend of my father. About 22 hours less than the train journey had taken!
Last edited by BEagle; 7th Oct 2009 at 20:23.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: N/A
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
vecvechookattack: Nice trolling, sailor -- and you even got a bite!
I hope your Service is prepared to be annihilated by Nimrod MR2s yet again over the next 7 days of Joint Warrior :-)
I hope your Service is prepared to be annihilated by Nimrod MR2s yet again over the next 7 days of Joint Warrior :-)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by enginesuck
No longer has a role ? Actually its a platform which still has a lot to offer in several different roles
(Yes, I know it had multiple roles anyway)