Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

"MERLIN"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jan 2002, 14:25
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: durham
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Thanks jackonicko you have understood the q's. Fobotcso could do with reading a little more into the questions rather than going off on one. <img src="wink.gif" border="0">
spicycoke is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2002, 15:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Propping up the bar...
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Admin Guru - the new landies don't fit, or so the trials mates at EGDM tell us, and i think they probably know, don't you.

Still, don't know how they managed to find time to tell us, what with all that whinging they were doing about pay and such like...
Jump jump John is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2002, 23:36
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Beyond the black stump!
Posts: 1,419
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Wink

I was told about the Landrover problem in 1989, when I first saw the EH-101.

Don't know when they changed Landrovers, or what the changes are.

Those Toyota trucks sure seem to hold up well in Afghanistan! <img src="wink.gif" border="0">
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2002, 02:43
  #24 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,579
Received 435 Likes on 229 Posts
Post

Cyclic Hotline,

The earlier little Landies had leaf springs. The later ones have coil springs, bigger overall body dimensions and sit higher.

They were talking about the EHI 01 a long time before 1989, don't know when they noticed the new Landrovers wouldn't fit though. I think the design was already committed.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 26th Jan 2002, 01:17
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,500
Received 89 Likes on 35 Posts
Post

Must be something about Benson...

The Argosy (Whistling T1t) was designed to carry the Saracen APC. By the time AW's finest entered service, the Saracen was up to the Mk 2 version and - guess what? - it didn't fit.

I see we are still learning from our mastikes - not.
Thud_and_Blunder is online now  
Old 26th Jan 2002, 01:32
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So a Series One Landrover would definitely fit in a 101 then?
Oh I See is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2002, 16:00
  #27 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,579
Received 435 Likes on 229 Posts
Post

OIC,

Not necessarily! But I recall that being part of the original requirement. I know the steep angle of dangle of the ramp was a problem, I saw them trying to winch one in once. I don't think driving one in was possible.

Some of the glossy blurb showed Argocats being used instead!

Underslung is better anyway, it's quicker to load and allows for an instant large reduction in gross weight..
ShyTorque is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.