Britain's flying tankers hailed as 'Godsend'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Britain's flying tankers hailed as 'Godsend'
From today's Torygraph:
Britain's flying tankers hailed as 'Godsend'
By David Graves, aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and Neil Tweedie
AMERICAN pilots yesterday described the RAF's aerial refuelling crews as the silent "heroes" of the bombing campaign in Afghanistan.
While the American tankers were restricted to pre-arranged areas of operations over Afghanistan, the six RAF aircraft were prepared to "go anywhere they were needed" over the country, which enabled more targets to be attacked, the pilots disclosed. As a result, the British aircraft are preferred even over their American counterparts by the combat crews.
The pilots aboard the American aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, who have launched nearly 1,100 sorties against Taliban targets and terrorist positions belonging to Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda network, said they were "extremely grateful" for the service provided by the RAF tankers.
"They're my heroes. They don't have as many assets as the US, but every time I've flown they had a plane out there," said Capt Stephen Voetsch, the US Navy air wing commander aboard the Theodore Roosevelt.
Six RAF tanker aircraft, two TriStars from 216 Squadron and four VC10s from 10 and 101 Squadrons, were deployed to the Middle East at the start of the bombing campaign on Oct 7. While no British combat aircraft have participated in the air strikes so far, the unheralded role of the tankers has largely gone unnoticed.
Usually based in Oman, the tankers fly every day to ensure the American aircraft bombing targets in Afghanistan are able to fly above the country long enough to complete their missions. The Navy F-14 Tomcats and Marine Corps F/A-18C Hornets launched from the Theodore Roosevelt and its sister carrier, the Carl Vinson, are refuelled at least twice over the country, sometimes more.
With some of the targets up to 900 miles from the carriers, the pilots said the service offered by the RAF was vital to enable them to complete their missions successfully. They also said that the refuelling process used by the RAF was more compatible to their aircraft than that offered by the US Air Force.
One pilot said the RAF tankers were the first choice for the carrier aircraft. "The US Navy and Air Force use different refuelling systems, and we are much happier using the RAF tankers than the air force because their system is much more like ours," he said.
Rear Admiral Mark Fitzgerald, commander of the Theodore Roosevelt battle group, described the RAF tankers as "a Godsend" and said his pilots referred to them as "a basket of choice", a reference to the refuelling method involving a basket at the end of a fuel hose in which an aircraft sticks a probe to refuel.
A Marine Corps Hornet pilot said the RAF crews were prepared to go anywhere over Afghanistan, unlike the US Air Force tankers. "They will go with you wherever you want to go. With so many targets now being designated at a late stage it is vital we have that flexibility. "When we want to refuel, they are always there. Their contribution is absolutely immense," he said.
The 30-year-old captain, who has flown 13 sorties over Afghanistan, said the crew of one of the Tristars had "highly amused" him and his colleagues in VMFA-251 Squadron by putting a "cash only" sign in the windows of the tanker one night when they were refuelling.
The RAF tanker crews are pushing themselves to the limits of safety in operations over Afghanistan, flying at four times the rate they would normally achieve in peacetime, the Ministry of Defence said. They were currently flying 120 hours every 28 days, compared to the normal maximum monthly total of about 30 hours, a source said.
One fifth of US aircraft in ground attacks were being refuelled by the RAF.
Britain's flying tankers hailed as 'Godsend'
By David Graves, aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and Neil Tweedie
AMERICAN pilots yesterday described the RAF's aerial refuelling crews as the silent "heroes" of the bombing campaign in Afghanistan.
While the American tankers were restricted to pre-arranged areas of operations over Afghanistan, the six RAF aircraft were prepared to "go anywhere they were needed" over the country, which enabled more targets to be attacked, the pilots disclosed. As a result, the British aircraft are preferred even over their American counterparts by the combat crews.
The pilots aboard the American aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, who have launched nearly 1,100 sorties against Taliban targets and terrorist positions belonging to Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda network, said they were "extremely grateful" for the service provided by the RAF tankers.
"They're my heroes. They don't have as many assets as the US, but every time I've flown they had a plane out there," said Capt Stephen Voetsch, the US Navy air wing commander aboard the Theodore Roosevelt.
Six RAF tanker aircraft, two TriStars from 216 Squadron and four VC10s from 10 and 101 Squadrons, were deployed to the Middle East at the start of the bombing campaign on Oct 7. While no British combat aircraft have participated in the air strikes so far, the unheralded role of the tankers has largely gone unnoticed.
Usually based in Oman, the tankers fly every day to ensure the American aircraft bombing targets in Afghanistan are able to fly above the country long enough to complete their missions. The Navy F-14 Tomcats and Marine Corps F/A-18C Hornets launched from the Theodore Roosevelt and its sister carrier, the Carl Vinson, are refuelled at least twice over the country, sometimes more.
With some of the targets up to 900 miles from the carriers, the pilots said the service offered by the RAF was vital to enable them to complete their missions successfully. They also said that the refuelling process used by the RAF was more compatible to their aircraft than that offered by the US Air Force.
One pilot said the RAF tankers were the first choice for the carrier aircraft. "The US Navy and Air Force use different refuelling systems, and we are much happier using the RAF tankers than the air force because their system is much more like ours," he said.
Rear Admiral Mark Fitzgerald, commander of the Theodore Roosevelt battle group, described the RAF tankers as "a Godsend" and said his pilots referred to them as "a basket of choice", a reference to the refuelling method involving a basket at the end of a fuel hose in which an aircraft sticks a probe to refuel.
A Marine Corps Hornet pilot said the RAF crews were prepared to go anywhere over Afghanistan, unlike the US Air Force tankers. "They will go with you wherever you want to go. With so many targets now being designated at a late stage it is vital we have that flexibility. "When we want to refuel, they are always there. Their contribution is absolutely immense," he said.
The 30-year-old captain, who has flown 13 sorties over Afghanistan, said the crew of one of the Tristars had "highly amused" him and his colleagues in VMFA-251 Squadron by putting a "cash only" sign in the windows of the tanker one night when they were refuelling.
The RAF tanker crews are pushing themselves to the limits of safety in operations over Afghanistan, flying at four times the rate they would normally achieve in peacetime, the Ministry of Defence said. They were currently flying 120 hours every 28 days, compared to the normal maximum monthly total of about 30 hours, a source said.
One fifth of US aircraft in ground attacks were being refuelled by the RAF.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Wherever the nearest braai is?
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome, well done the boys and girls from BZN. Bout time got some decent and worthy PR.
Also the Victor Charlie one zero, what an aircraft, lady of the skies.
Also the Victor Charlie one zero, what an aircraft, lady of the skies.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
I am sure that a contractor would provide the same service (not).
Must be an interesting calculation on remaining airframe hours/fatigue life and how long till replacements will be available.
Mind you - there should be a lot of cheap airframes around at the moment.........
Is this a good time to get Jacko and the rest of the press to give Tony a hard time about privatisation....especially after Railtrack?
Must be an interesting calculation on remaining airframe hours/fatigue life and how long till replacements will be available.
Mind you - there should be a lot of cheap airframes around at the moment.........
Is this a good time to get Jacko and the rest of the press to give Tony a hard time about privatisation....especially after Railtrack?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congratulations to 216 and 10 Sqns; and even (through gritted teeth) to the "squadron with a hole in the middle". Nice to see some appreciation of light blue support from the dark blue for a change - even if in American accents (save "Mumbles" that is!). Keep it up, lads and lasses ...doh. 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As another Tanker Trash old boy I add my congratulations and pleasure in seeing that the "can do" spirit lives on in spite of all that is thrown in the spokes. It must also emphasise the need to preserve a training system that breeds a freedom to think for yourself and allows you to exercise that freedom in a tactical situation. This surely is why we stand out from the crowd.
Could this level of commitment be sustained under the terms of the proposed PFI, in addition to other ongoing commitments?
How about a bigger (Desert Storm) level of RAF tanker commitment?
Isn't it now time to quietly bury this mad-brained privatisation bollock$?
How about a bigger (Desert Storm) level of RAF tanker commitment?
Isn't it now time to quietly bury this mad-brained privatisation bollock$?
Just a numbered other
Hope President Bliar didn't read it.
America reckons the tankers were 'Godsent'
Actually, Tony sent them.
Ergo Tony = God
The pillock rates himself highly enough already. We'll never control him now!
America reckons the tankers were 'Godsent'
Actually, Tony sent them.
Ergo Tony = God
The pillock rates himself highly enough already. We'll never control him now!
Despite increasing difficulties, we're still able to train our tanker crews to work as an effective 'can-do' team, supported by an equally dedicated 'can-do' ground crew team.
Regrettably our 'squadron engineers' are being swept away by the bean counters who don't understand intangible assets and we're being forced to go back to the universally-despised archaic centralised servicing concept; add that to the ludicrous PFI so beloved of the DPA suits and the future looks pretty bleak....
So wouldn't it be a really excellent idea to buy up a couple of dozen ex-BA 767s, get them modded to carry 94 tonne of fuel, fit a full-up military flight deck with a 3rd crew station for the Systems Panel Operator and return to 2 dedicated tanker transport squadrons having nothing to do with daft PPP procurement .....bet no-one has said that before!
"Bah, wibble....purple jointery...I hear what you say...blue water of defence thinking...inter alia...smart procurement...consultancies...non-executive directorships...baaaah" quoth A Military Spokesperson....
Regrettably our 'squadron engineers' are being swept away by the bean counters who don't understand intangible assets and we're being forced to go back to the universally-despised archaic centralised servicing concept; add that to the ludicrous PFI so beloved of the DPA suits and the future looks pretty bleak....
So wouldn't it be a really excellent idea to buy up a couple of dozen ex-BA 767s, get them modded to carry 94 tonne of fuel, fit a full-up military flight deck with a 3rd crew station for the Systems Panel Operator and return to 2 dedicated tanker transport squadrons having nothing to do with daft PPP procurement .....bet no-one has said that before!
"Bah, wibble....purple jointery...I hear what you say...blue water of defence thinking...inter alia...smart procurement...consultancies...non-executive directorships...baaaah" quoth A Military Spokesperson....
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
And what a good idea for BA to push - the cashflow would come in handy.
Gosh! Reminds of the good old day's! Where did we get those Tristars from?
Gosh! Reminds of the good old day's! Where did we get those Tristars from?
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bar
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The crews are doing an exceptional job especially as they're all sleeping in the same tent! Yes that's right the RAF beancounters have managed to save a lot of dosh by shoehorning 30 male and female aircrew into one canvas bedroom with the beds so close together that you can touch each other.
Absolutely ideal conditions for 24 hour ops......NOT!
Absolutely ideal conditions for 24 hour ops......NOT!
Orac - the same people who gave us our thirdhand VC10K2s and our secondhand VC10K4s!! The MoD has never paid the market price for the RAF's 'Force enablers' (my original phrase!) - and now that their worth has been proved yet again as it was in the Falklands War, Gulf War, Bosnia, Kosovo......, it's about bŁoody time that serious funding was allocated to a next-generation AAR/AT aircraft instead of the RAF's share of the defence vote merely fuelling just the BWoS Bureaufighter, Nimrod Y3K and Bristol Bureaucrat monetary black holes!
Ivor - but aren't they grudgingly providing some MFI flat-pack portacabins for the winter? Presumably the readily available nearby accommodation is reserved purely for visiting Melchetts...
From the Daily Scoop: "Britain's contribution to the US assault on the Taleban is threatened by penny-pinching MoD bean counters. The RAF's air-to-air refuelling aircraft crews, described as the 'silent heroes' by their grateful US Navy and Marine Corps 'customers' are being forced to live in squalid tents on their airfield because the MoD refuses to permit them to live in the readily available local accommodation. Not that such inconvenience was afforded to recent big-wig visitors, of course! But the mixed-sex RAF crews are getting on with the job despite the conditions, lack of US-style 'tax-breaks' or Combat Pay and are providing their vital 'Force-Enabling' service to US warplanes around the clock. But, when the airline industry recovers from the doldrums, how many of these pilots will remember how they were treated during the Afghanistan War - and will vote with their feet? Is it really too much to expect the penny-pinchers in Whitehall to put their hands in their pockets to show some tangible support to the New Few?"
[ 11 November 2001: Message edited by: BEagle ]
Ivor - but aren't they grudgingly providing some MFI flat-pack portacabins for the winter? Presumably the readily available nearby accommodation is reserved purely for visiting Melchetts...
From the Daily Scoop: "Britain's contribution to the US assault on the Taleban is threatened by penny-pinching MoD bean counters. The RAF's air-to-air refuelling aircraft crews, described as the 'silent heroes' by their grateful US Navy and Marine Corps 'customers' are being forced to live in squalid tents on their airfield because the MoD refuses to permit them to live in the readily available local accommodation. Not that such inconvenience was afforded to recent big-wig visitors, of course! But the mixed-sex RAF crews are getting on with the job despite the conditions, lack of US-style 'tax-breaks' or Combat Pay and are providing their vital 'Force-Enabling' service to US warplanes around the clock. But, when the airline industry recovers from the doldrums, how many of these pilots will remember how they were treated during the Afghanistan War - and will vote with their feet? Is it really too much to expect the penny-pinchers in Whitehall to put their hands in their pockets to show some tangible support to the New Few?"
[ 11 November 2001: Message edited by: BEagle ]
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bar
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Beagle,
Yes there are supposedly some 'Portakabins' on order, latest ETA is March!!! Methinks visitng Melchetts will be staying in Hotac with the Movers. Aparently Movers need a good nights sleep in case they screw up the bags off/bags on, people off/people on routine or forget to wear those ridiculous 'Dayglo' jackets!!!
Yes there are supposedly some 'Portakabins' on order, latest ETA is March!!! Methinks visitng Melchetts will be staying in Hotac with the Movers. Aparently Movers need a good nights sleep in case they screw up the bags off/bags on, people off/people on routine or forget to wear those ridiculous 'Dayglo' jackets!!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Pole
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the meantime, while we're stretched for crews and running at around 60% establishment in at least one branch, and equally tight on airframes; maintaining schedules to Kuwait and Sierra Leone and the ongoing commitment to the No fly zones. How on Earth can we justify a crew and a frame sitting around on their elbows all day in the Falklands. Are 'they' standing by to counter an invasion from a bankrupt nation with no credible airforce or using up valuable assets simple to enable more 'training' time for the fast jets?
But the pointy-heads might then have to fly with tanks on! Shock horror!!
"Big picture...defence commitments...I hear what you say...demonstration of faith...oil...bug ger, didn't mean to say that. OK - diamonds. Double bug ger - and they're in Sierra Leone in any casr...errr, 'cos mad old Maggie said so...wibble, wibble...shut up and get on with your prep boy!"
[ 11 November 2001: Message edited by: BEagle, because if you type 'b****r' instead of bug ger, the nanny naughty word editor replaces it!! ]
[ 11 November 2001: Message edited by: BEagle ]
"Big picture...defence commitments...I hear what you say...demonstration of faith...oil...bug ger, didn't mean to say that. OK - diamonds. Double bug ger - and they're in Sierra Leone in any casr...errr, 'cos mad old Maggie said so...wibble, wibble...shut up and get on with your prep boy!"
[ 11 November 2001: Message edited by: BEagle, because if you type 'b****r' instead of bug ger, the nanny naughty word editor replaces it!! ]
[ 11 November 2001: Message edited by: BEagle ]
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: **VN
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"A Marine Corps Hornet pilot said the RAF crews were prepared to go anywhere over Afghanistan, unlike the US Air Force tankers. "They will go with you wherever you want to go. With so many targets now being designated at a late stage it is vital we have that flexibility. "When we want to refuel, they are always there. Their contribution is absolutely immense," he said."
I wonder how flexible those PFI tanker contracts will be. If it is anything like the EFT Tutor shambles it looks like the USA may have to rethink 20% of their missions that depend on the current Brize boyz.
Opps..does that class me as an official whinger like Beags!
I wonder how flexible those PFI tanker contracts will be. If it is anything like the EFT Tutor shambles it looks like the USA may have to rethink 20% of their missions that depend on the current Brize boyz.
Opps..does that class me as an official whinger like Beags!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great job boys and girls.
Unfortunately the political apathy is much closer to home than you think. At a recent Full Council meeting of West Oxfordshire District Council held in Witney the war was briefly mentioned. The Leader of the Council, one Mr Barry Norton of North Leigh, wanted to gloss overy the subject and carry on with the next point because "it doesn't affect us". RAF Brize Norton falls within his domain.
This is a man who doesn't own a passport, has never been abroad in his life and appears frightened of anyone more intelligent than himself. Clearly has a grip on the big picture (not). He's also paid Ł18,000 a year from money contributed by the boys and girls working at Brize/living in Carterton.
Fortunately the Chairman of the Council, Tony Walker is far more sensible and offered a prayer of thanksgiving for the work being done by Service personnel at RAF Brize Norton and for their safe return. I'm happy to say that the rest of the Council, particularly ex-mil types were more than happy to pray with him.
Unfortunately the political apathy is much closer to home than you think. At a recent Full Council meeting of West Oxfordshire District Council held in Witney the war was briefly mentioned. The Leader of the Council, one Mr Barry Norton of North Leigh, wanted to gloss overy the subject and carry on with the next point because "it doesn't affect us". RAF Brize Norton falls within his domain.
This is a man who doesn't own a passport, has never been abroad in his life and appears frightened of anyone more intelligent than himself. Clearly has a grip on the big picture (not). He's also paid Ł18,000 a year from money contributed by the boys and girls working at Brize/living in Carterton.
Fortunately the Chairman of the Council, Tony Walker is far more sensible and offered a prayer of thanksgiving for the work being done by Service personnel at RAF Brize Norton and for their safe return. I'm happy to say that the rest of the Council, particularly ex-mil types were more than happy to pray with him.
Pilot Officer PPRuNe
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MaxR8
Nothing wrong with the Tutor
BEags, couldn't agree more about the tankers. Considering they are so important and they are helping build Tony's empire you would think the fleet would get more support.
Tonks
Nothing wrong with the Tutor
BEags, couldn't agree more about the tankers. Considering they are so important and they are helping build Tony's empire you would think the fleet would get more support.
Tonks